Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Its backer, Texas oil man Edward Bass, spent somewhere between $150 to $200 million. It seems however that the managers running Biosphere 2 didn’t keep good books, and when Bass asked for an accounting they couldn’t provide it....
1 posted on 04/05/2018 1:32:52 PM PDT by Voption
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Voption

2 posted on 04/05/2018 1:35:44 PM PDT by Red Badger (The people who call Trump a tyrant are the same people who want the president to confiscate weapons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Voption

Two men in, one man out.


3 posted on 04/05/2018 1:38:08 PM PDT by TexasGator (Z1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Voption

I toured that place once - Bass was a scientific HERO for funding that- it was amazing.

The ‘tards he got to run it, however, were something else.

The 8 lunatics who put themselves inside it for a year drove each other crazy, and according to the tour guide we talked to, they never speak to each other these days.

They should have kept it up after the first crew went in.

If they went nuts after 3 months they should have stopped, rebooted, and started again with a new crew.

And kept doing it until they learned things.

Now it is just being used as a giant greenhouse for experiments- but it was AMAZING thing to see, and I wish Bass was more renowned for his effort.


4 posted on 04/05/2018 1:45:27 PM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing Obamacare is worse than Obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Voption

I really loved that experiment. It was badly designed and poorly executed, but it really should have been continued using the lessons learned. Heck, I spent most of my high school years jotting down ideas for a Bioshpere 3.


8 posted on 04/05/2018 1:52:32 PM PDT by Ellendra (Those who kill without reason cannot be reasoned with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Voption
...during the first mission, the oxygen levels in the facility dropped over time much more than expected, caused first by far cloudier weather than expected (resulting in less plant growth), and second by an unexpected absorption of oxygen by the curing concrete in the building. Both of these issues involved engineering miscalculations, but such mistakes are part of the development of all new technology. You can’t think of everything, and so you do experiments to find out what you failed to account for.

Concrete is not "new technology". And clouds are not even "technology", nor are they "new".

9 posted on 04/05/2018 1:53:00 PM PDT by WayneS (An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. - Winston Churchill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Voption

Always thought it would be a blast to live in that thing. The trick would be to drive everyone else nuts as soon as possible so they’d leave and you could have it all to yourself.


10 posted on 04/05/2018 1:55:54 PM PDT by bigbob (Trust Trump. Trust Sessions. The Great Awakening is at hand...MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Voption

The biggest problem is they went at it backwards. They started with the “big” run, which of course had problems and wound up completely invalidating the science. The first run should have been a month, they shouldn’t have tried for a whole year until the 10th run having built the length with every time. They’ve still managed to run some OK science there in intervening years, especially when it was run by Columbia. And being a fair bit cooler than the city it’s a great place to go in the summer.


11 posted on 04/05/2018 1:58:59 PM PDT by discostu (It's been so long, welcome back my friend, to the show, that never ends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Voption
No lie - I thought the title said Blogosphere 2.
13 posted on 04/05/2018 2:03:18 PM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Voption

We visited the BioSphere a couple of years ago. We found it dirty and not well kept. I cannot imagine living there. IIRC, a member of the first group to ‘live’ in the BioSphere nearly cut off a finger and had to be removed to a hospital, within the first few weeks. I would have stayed out. Looking from afar, the East Coast, when the experiment was begun, I thought it would be a great place. Now it is a place for biology experiments for kids from the U of Arizona.


15 posted on 04/05/2018 3:30:10 PM PDT by originalbuckeye ('In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act'- George Orwell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Voption

“”This week Diane and I have a friend visiting from back east. As locals generally do when guests visit, we used this visit as an excuse to go sightseeing at local attractions that we somehow never got the time to visit on our own.So on Tuesday we drove north to take a tour of Biosphere 2, what has been called “a giant space-age ark in the middle of the desert.””

I next expected to read “And as we do with all of our visitors from the east, we kicked them out of the car and drove off when we got there”


16 posted on 04/05/2018 4:42:09 PM PDT by Celerity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Voption

The problem began with the original design concept. To start with, design solely for biological efficiency. That is, you first want a closed ecosphere that is entirely *balanced* and can operate without any intervention. A terrarium.

Only when you have that can you intentionally create a situation of *imbalance*, in which people would consume the excess, and their waste would replenish deficits. Almost as important as the people themselves is their microbiological biome. All the different kinds of bacteria, viruses and other microorganisms in them. They likely need to be incorporated into the ecosystem even before the people arrive.

So when the humans are introduced, you are not creating imbalance, but restoring balance.


17 posted on 04/05/2018 6:36:06 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Liberals have become moralistic, dogmatic, sententious, self-righteous, pinch-faced prudes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson