Posted on 01/10/2018 2:36:31 AM PST by markomalley
What she actually is is a full time Social Justice Warrior. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Translation:
” What she actually is , is a liberal fascist, working according to the directives of Saul Alinsky ( Rules for Radicals)”
Trump is beating the liberal fascists like a drum.They are desperate as they see their false utopia unravel.And the question is how many want to fight and die for it?
What to know more about the liberal fascist movement?
Read here:
The Quintessential Liberal Fascist
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html
I agree: "...The part I regret about this is that some random FReeper has to put this crap together..."
If there were a media that wasn't 95% in the tank for liberal moonbattery, this would have been something that the public would know. Instead, we get a "professor at Yale"
>>> “Voluntary clinical faculty” .... It is a non-tenure track unpaid designation, there are at least 10 000 volunteer teachers so designated at US medical schools, in general, it is not as significant as a paid tenure track job, the usual adjective for which is “full time”.
But why would medical schools let these ‘voluntary clinical faculty’ teach regular courses? Are they just substitute teachers on call filling in when regular professors can’t make it?
Or, come from a wealthy family and don’t need to depend on income from actual work.
btt
If she earned an MD and specialized in Psychiatry, she is a Psychiatrist. The fact that she has been unlicensed for over two years indicates that she does not practice nor is she currently able to practice psychiatry.
Given her lack of professional ethics, she should not practice. If she was licensed, she could be sued (IMHO).
be careful. there is this:
Yale School of Medicine: Bandy X. Lee, MD, MDiv
Assistant Clinical Professor
...She has been teaching students studying to be public defenders and to become asylum attorneys at Yale Law School since 2003, and a Global Health Studies course of her design, “Violence: Causes and Cures,” since 2013. She has served as consultant to the World Health Organization Violence and Injury Prevention department, UNESCO, and other United Nations bodies, and as speaker to the World Economic Forum...
http://psychiatry.yale.edu/people/bandy_lee.profile
and you can click above her pic for “research & publications” and “patient care”.
Nice work. Do you remember the doctor who was pilloried for explaining on his YouTube channel the reasons he believed Hillary might be suffering from Parkinson’s or some other serious neurological disorder and he backed up his assertions with examples of her many episodes on the campaign trail? The left in the media and elsewhere were outraged a doctor could come out with such claims because he hadn’t examined her. They went after him for it but he had more concrete evidence and was on more solid ground than this quack has on DJT yet they want to use her examenless speculation as a basis for removing him from office.
Is she a medical doctor or a PhD?
However, once someone gets a certification in fields that I understand (CTS-D, RCDD and IRS Enrolled Agent) one NEVER lets these lapse. You keep getting enough continuing education that you never let it lapse and you make doubly sure that the governing board accepts and approves those hours.
So is being licensed in NY “good enough” for her needs, to allow her to be listed as a volunteer at Yale and to work with the progressive UN lefties all over the world?
And to think that there was a time that the medical profession was respected everywhere ...
then there is this:
Bandy X Lee deletes twitter account after it was discovered her medical license expired in 2015
http://www.pacificpundit.com/2018/01/09/bandy-x-lee-deletes-twitter-account-after-it-was-discovered-her-medical-license-expired-in-2015/
Good research. Thanks.
My guess is she’s on the payroll of China/North Korea (or both) as an agitprop agent....
It appeared to just expire. No complaints against her license were noted.
I attended the American Psychiatric Association Annual Conference in San Diego last May and listened to the experts debate the Goldwater Rule which is in the App’s ethical standards.
It is also the topic of the psychiatry grand rounds at the hospital tomorrow.
What people fail to realize is that the ethics standard itself does not govern the process of psychiatrists giving mental health opinions on public figures.
Goldwater went to court and won a judgement for libel and slander. The ethics standard was established as a guideline to protect psychiatrists from committing these crimes in the future.
The law still is the law, irregardless of what the ethical standards are.
“But why would medical schools let these ‘voluntary clinical faculty’ teach regular courses?”
My daughter’s school has regular guest lecturers. In addition, there are many schools that have various centers for pushing some kind of research or pushing a political agenda (for example, my daughter’s school has a Center for Eastern Christianity that they sponsor)
That could be part of it.
I do question how she could have the license to prescribe drugs without the medical license.
I’m pretty sure that is a violation.
You can graduate and never pass your boards
Nice job, you autistic centipede you! Yup, spread this far and wide. I’ll put it on reddit in a bit...
Here is additional important information per Wiki:
The court found that the evidence introduced at trial proved the defendants knew they were publishing defamatory statements and “were motivated by actual malice when they published the statements.” The court found the defendants guilty of libel action based on the article Fact published.
The plaintiff demanded $1,000,000 in compensatory and punitive damages but Senator Goldwater was awarded $1 in compensatory damages and $75,000 in punitive damages. The compensatory damages were against all defendants but the punitive damages were split between the defendants.
Ginzburg and Boroson were liable for $25,000 of the $75,000 and Fact Magazine, Inc. was liable for $50,000. The United States Court of Appeals affirmed the award and the Supreme Court denied a petition for certiorari (review); Justices Black and Justice Douglas joined a dissenting opinion, rather unusual at the time (1970) on orders denying “cert.” Boroson was the only defendant not to file an appeal after receiving the ruling.
Commentary
Although over 1,800 psychiatrists responded to the polls sent by Ginzburg, the medical director at the time, Walter Barton, sent a protest warning Ginzburg that “a psychiatrist’s evaluation must take place in the context of a doctor-patient relationship and a “thorough clinical examination”.”
The American Psychiatric Association then issued the Goldwater rule reaffirming medical privacy and forbidding commenting on a patient that any individual psychiatrist has not personally examined.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.