Posted on 01/03/2018 11:59:09 AM PST by Berlin_Freeper
Former White House chief strategist Stephen Bannon said there was "zero" chance that President Trump was not aware of a controversial 2016 meeting at Trump Tower between one of his sons and a Russian lawyer, according to a new book.
According to MSNBC, which tweeted an excerpt from Michael Wolff's upcoming book, "Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House," Bannon said that it was likely Donald Trump Jr. took lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya and others up to his father's office during the meeting.
The chance that Don. Jr did not walk these Jumos up to his fathers office on the 26th floor is zero," the excerpt reads.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
I wonder how much Mueller paid him?
So, what laws were violated even if Jared did talk to some Russians?
Bannon is a disgusting turncoat. Shame on him for smearing the Trump family . He cares nothing beyond his own ego.
JUST for argument’s sake, if he did, is there a crime in that?
Who can prove what was said?
Wait, so the uncle of a friend of someone who worked at MSNBC found a radio report of a tweet about a book excerpt from someone who said he something?
Well HELL. I'm SOLD!
None, there’s no such thing as collusion. Campaign donations in cash or in kind are another matter.
I have to ask myself why is Bannon doing this now? What’s his endgame?
BTW when somebody says 100% chance of an event likely means they never witnessed and just conjecturing.
No, not even close. Still waiting for Bannon to say something publicly.
Bannon is a disgusting turncoat. Shame on him for smearing the Trump family . He cares nothing beyond his own ego.
-
Ditto.
LMAO!! Now it’s TheHill.com. Amazing how the liberal “media” outlets suddenly are treating the words of Bannon like gospel.
The Twits are likely quoting each other in a circle.
Does Bannon know that Wolffy is putting words in his mouth?
I'm curious as to why Trump trusted that greasy POS in the first place.
So what? Even if this was true there is no criminality in listening to a foreigner who says “I know something damaging about your opponent and I want to tell it to you”. None whatsoever.
Maybe Bannon never said it. Wolff is reputed to have made things up in his previous books.
Who even knows this was what Bannon said. Who is the writer of this book? How credible is he?
And there are a lot of books that claim Hillary and the Clintons are criminals with credible evidence, yet the media never bothered tweeting excerpts from those books.
Bannon will not change ideologically. So he is being blackmailed. Mueller. He has something on him.
Ding! Ding! Ding!
Come on man, you don’t think that POS Mueller is finding something on everyone to hold against their throats?
Hell, you could put anyone away for 5 or 10 years if you looked and tried hard enough.
Loads of obscure laws to try to people for breaking.
I wonder what poor Sessions did that wasn’t so bad or was an oversight that now is being used against him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.