Skip to comments.
Peyton Manning Sexual Assault Deposition Video
tmz.com ^
| 10/30/17
| tmz
Posted on 10/30/2017 1:42:35 PM PDT by ColdOne
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
1
posted on
10/30/2017 1:42:35 PM PDT
by
ColdOne
To: ColdOne
2
posted on
10/30/2017 1:45:09 PM PDT
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set!)
To: ColdOne
Perhaps he thought she needed a closer look
..
3
posted on
10/30/2017 1:45:26 PM PDT
by
txrefugee
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Now I know why that lightbulb headed dork has always sceeved me out.
He was lighting up my pervdar.
4
posted on
10/30/2017 1:46:48 PM PDT
by
bagster
(The North remembers.)
To: ColdOne
That’s why she waited over 20 years to talk about it.
I see an opportunist here.
To: ColdOne
To: colorado tanker
I believe Peyton too. If she doesn't know that guys prank each other other in the locker room then she should have stayed outta there.
This would be like her complaining about guys walking nude around her - and she's in a man's locker room.
This may be some attempt to make sure he never runs for the Senate.
I would not put it past Hillary.
7
posted on
10/30/2017 1:53:35 PM PDT
by
Slyfox
(Are you tired of winning yet?)
To: bagster
Maybe you need to recalibrate your “pervdar”....
8
posted on
10/30/2017 1:59:16 PM PDT
by
JBW1949
(I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
To: JBW1949
Yea I probably do. I think it got overloaded and fried when Clinton was president.
I'll call today. I know a guy.
9
posted on
10/30/2017 2:01:45 PM PDT
by
bagster
(The North remembers.)
To: bagster
“He was lighting up my pervdar. “
You need to set it to 11.
10
posted on
10/30/2017 2:10:34 PM PDT
by
dljordan
(WhoVoltaire: "To find out who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.")
To: dljordan
You need to set it to 11. I might have to invest in the deluxe version. What with the increased frequency of pervocity that is cropping up.
I'm not really sure our level of technology can handle the load.
11
posted on
10/30/2017 2:14:22 PM PDT
by
bagster
(The North remembers.)
To: ColdOne
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Dr. Jamie Naughright Has a name that begs for phonetic clarification.
13
posted on
10/30/2017 2:28:57 PM PDT
by
ptsal
( Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - M. Twain)
To: Enlightened1
You’ve confused me.
Your reading of this post differs from mine.
The post read:
“Peyton sat for the deposition back in 2003 ... after Dr. Jamie Naughright sued him for defamation over a chapter in his autobiography about the 1996 incident.”
So the incident happened in 1996.
His autobiography came out in some unspecified year.
She sued him in some unspecified year.
And, after both of these events happened, he sat for a deposition in 2003.
That is at the very most seven years between the incident happened and her lawsuit was filed publicly contesting his version of the events. And I assume it was fewer than seven years.
So I don’t understand the 20 years figure for her to “talk about it.”
14
posted on
10/30/2017 2:33:32 PM PDT
by
Chad N. Freud
(FR is the modern equivalent of the Committees of Correspondence. Let other analogies arise.)
To: Chad N. Freud
Just because someone files a lawsuit on a someone does not make them automatically guilty. You seem to think the incident happened, but no one really knows that except for Peyton and her.
I am sorry but was Peyton manning found guilty in a court of law?
Answer: No
Yes Dr. Jamie Naughright wants a pay day. I bet she sees Peyton as a cash cow that will probably help pay her medical school loans.
To: Slyfox
This may be some attempt to make sure he never runs for the Senate.
Exactly.
16
posted on
10/30/2017 3:05:11 PM PDT
by
Old Yeller
(Auto-correct has become my worst enema.)
To: ColdOne
17
posted on
10/30/2017 3:10:49 PM PDT
by
Conserv
To: ColdOne
shoving his testicles and anus into her face while she was examining him on a training tableI thought everyone did that.
18
posted on
10/30/2017 3:13:00 PM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: Enlightened1
Thats why she waited over 20 years to talk about it.
Not a fan of Manning, but I see this as a preemptive action since Manning is being encouraged to run for Sen. Corker's open seat in TN.
'Head him off at the pass' so to speak.
Purely political.
19
posted on
10/30/2017 3:13:16 PM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: Enlightened1
I agree. I have no idea what took place. I just didn’t see where the “20 years” figure came from.
20
posted on
10/30/2017 3:23:52 PM PDT
by
Chad N. Freud
(FR is the modern equivalent of the Committees of Correspondence. Let other analogies arise.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson