You’ve confused me.
Your reading of this post differs from mine.
The post read:
“Peyton sat for the deposition back in 2003 ... after Dr. Jamie Naughright sued him for defamation over a chapter in his autobiography about the 1996 incident.”
So the incident happened in 1996.
His autobiography came out in some unspecified year.
She sued him in some unspecified year.
And, after both of these events happened, he sat for a deposition in 2003.
That is at the very most seven years between the incident happened and her lawsuit was filed publicly contesting his version of the events. And I assume it was fewer than seven years.
So I don’t understand the 20 years figure for her to “talk about it.”
Just because someone files a lawsuit on a someone does not make them automatically guilty. You seem to think the incident happened, but no one really knows that except for Peyton and her.
I am sorry but was Peyton manning found guilty in a court of law?
Answer: No
Yes Dr. Jamie Naughright wants a pay day. I bet she sees Peyton as a cash cow that will probably help pay her medical school loans.