Posted on 09/23/2017 2:06:23 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Mike Rowe has had many jobs: actor, podcast host, even opera singer. But he is best known as a serial apprentice, participating in over 300 grubby gigs on the TV show Dirty Jobs and its successor Somebodys Gotta Do It. Affably working alongside people who do the unglamorous tasks that keep our economy humming, such as castrating lambs or laundering tons of dirty diapers, Rowes wit and wisdom have made him a favorite with viewers. But over time, he realized that something decidedly un-funny was happening in our country. A narrative that college is the only path to success began to tyrannize the young, honorable trades and manual jobs were not supported, and America began to suffer from a critical skills gap. Millions of youths began to fall between the cracks, at the same time that employers found it impossible to staff millions of well-paying blue-collar jobs.
So Rowe rolled up his sleeves and created mikeroweWORKS. It has provided over $3 million in scholarships for training in the trades. Rowe is also using his public platform to spread the message that manual work is valuable and dignified. Allison Futterman interviewed Rowe for Philanthropy to learn more about his philanthropic work on behalf of honest labor.
Philanthropy: What does your foundation do?
Rowe: mikeroweWORKS is designed to challenge the stigmas and stereotypes that keep millions of people from exploring a career in the trades. Its primary goal is to close the skills gap by calling attention to millions of unloved opportunities, and challenge the idea that a four-year degree is the best path for the most people. We also offer scholarships that pay for specific types of vocational training. At its base, mikeroweWORKS is a P.R. campaign for hard work and skilled labor.
Philanthropy: How did it come about?
Rowe: When the economy crashed in 2008, national unemployment was headline news. With every new jobs report, a growing sense of dread seemed to be overtaking the country, as the number of unemployed Americans kept growing. On Dirty Jobs, though, it was a very different story. The employers I met on that show were all struggling to find skilled workers. Even at the height of the recession, I saw Help Wanted signs in all 50 states, and talked with hundreds of small-business owners who said the biggest obstacles they faced were the stigmas and stereotypes that dissuaded people from exploring a career in the trades. It seemed obvious that closing the skills gap would never happen if we didnt confront those misperceptions head on and challenge them at every turn.
Philanthropy: How do you change the way people feel about work?
Rowe: Well, its hard. Attitudes and perceptions dont change overnight, and measuring success is difficult. But I had a big advantage going in. Dirty Jobs was already a very popular TV show, and part of my job as the host was to promote the program whenever possible. So the first thing I did was change the way I talked about the show in the press. Rather than focus exclusively on exploding toilets and misadventures in animal husbandry (which I still cherish, by the way), I started talking about the widening skills gap, the crumbling infrastructure, and the looming student-loan crisis. These issues were in the headlines, and Dirty Jobs touched on many of them. Pretty soon, I was speaking all over the country about the skills gap, and testifying before Congress about the need to reinvigorate skilled labor. Ultimately, I was able to promote my foundation by promoting my TV show, and vice versa.
Philanthropy: You started by building a database, right? How did that go?
Rowe: The Trade Resource Center was a challenge, but it was important for a couple reasons. Practically, I thought people could benefit from finding a specific training program in their state or county. So we organized thousands of existing programs and put them all under one virtual roof. We started with apprenticeship programs and on-the-job training opportunities that served the specific trades most in demand. Then we expanded to include trade schools and community colleges, along with specific data on what jobs were most in demand in various parts of the country. But the larger reason for building a national database was to prove that the opportunities in question really did exist.
Philanthropy: Why?
Rowe: Of all the things dividing us today, the very existence of opportunity is somewhere near the top. Half the country is convinced that opportunity is dead. That the system is rigged. That there is simply no hope of finding a meaningful career that pays a fair wage. Its almost impossible to reinvigorate skilled labor if people believe that nonsense. Just as its impossible to champion apprenticeship programs if everyone believes that success can only occur if you purchase a four-year college degree. Dirty Jobs challenged those misperceptions in every episode, but I wanted to challenge them in a more tangible way, with proof that opportunity was alive and well.
In the same way Dirty Jobs was programmed with viewer suggestions, the Trade Resource Center was built with viewer submissions. By 2008, the Dirty Jobs online community was not only enormous, it was comprised of fans who were completely engaged with all aspects of the show. So, when I invited them to send me the details of successful apprenticeship programs in their area, thousands responded. We built the Trade Resource Center onlinethanks to the fans.
A lot of people used it, and a lot of people found work as a result. We also built a Watercooler where skilled tradesmen volunteered to answer questions and offer advice, which was even more important. So the Trade Resource Center met a practical need. But the biggest benefit of building it was all the press that surrounded its construction. Building the Trade Resource Center got lots of people talking, and put our efforts on the map.
Philanthropy: So what became of it? Its no longer on your site.
Rowe: The site became too cumbersome to maintain, and too far removed from social media to maintain a robust conversation. By 2010, peoples habits and attitudes online were shifting dramatically. Had I understood that then, I would have never built a destination; I would have simply taken the message to where the people already were. Once it became clear that Facebook would dominate the social conversation, I started posting over there, and that changed everything.
The real lesson for me in all this has been the importance of being as congruent as possible with my audience, wherever they might be. On Facebook, that means maintaining a personal page that makes no distinction between business, personal, and foundational elements. Im not talking about traditional cause-related marketingIm talking about integrating my foundational objectives into everything I do. Because mikeroweWORKS is rooted in my own personal beliefs about the nature of work and education, and because most of what I do in television and media involves creating content that reflects those beliefs, I can benefit the foundation every time I go to work. I can also generate the kind of headlines I want to create, and then steer the resulting conversation around those headlines in a useful direction. Its a very opportunistic approach to creating awareness.
For instance, last month, I wrote a good-natured rant about Hasbros decision to replace the work-related icons on the Monopoly board. (The wheelbarrow was swapped out for a rubber ducky. Madness!) I posted the rant on Facebook. Over 5 million people shared it. FOX and CNN and Good Morning America all called to have me come on and have a conversation about Americas dysfunctional relationship with skilled laborinspired by the removal of a token from the Monopoly board. In the context of that conversation, I was able to talk about our Work Ethic Scholarship Program, and encourage people to apply.
Philanthropy: How much have you given away through your scholarship program, and why the emphasis on work ethic?
Rowe: About $4 million in total. Half from funds we raised directly, and half through various partnerships with trade schools. We focus on work ethic because thats what most employers crave in a new employee. That, and a willingness to learn a skill thats in demand. At base, we want our scholarships to reward the kind of behavior we wish to encourage. Today, there are no shortage of scholarships based on academic ability, athletic ability, musical talent, and all sorts of other things. But Ive never seen one based on work ethic. We look for applicants willing to show up early, stay late, and approach the job as the opportunity it is. You have to sign a S.W.E.A.T. Pledge. We also insist on references. I really want applicants to make a persuasive case for themselves.
Philanthropy: A sweat pledge?
Rowe: Its a simple, 12-point pledge that espouses personal responsibility. It stands for Skills and Work Ethic Arent Taboo, and I suspect it sounds a little silly to many. But its just one more way to bring the conversation back to the kind of qualities I believe most employers desperately want in their employees.
We get some resistance, but thats actually part of the programs success. It gives me a chance to say publiclyand respectfullythat those who object to the tenets I think are important might be better served by seeking out a different pile of free money. It gets peoples attention. Fact is, its hard to reward work ethic, because frankly, its hard to find it. Currently, Im trying to give away about $700,000 to people who want to learn a skilled trade. Youd think people would line up for a chance to get the training they need to get a job. But they dont. And thats part of the conversation.
We have to change the current perceptions of what it means to have a good job. With respect to job satisfaction, a lot of well-intended parents and guidance counselors have done a great disservice to hundreds of thousands of millennials by pushing them toward a four-year degree. Its a cookie-cutter approach to education, and its causing massive problems, including a $1.3 trillion debt, a widening skills gap, and soaring tuition costs. But theres also a widespread belief today that job satisfaction is only possible for those who find the proper job. Thats just not true. On Dirty Jobs, we featured hundreds of people who were very satisfied with their work, in spite of the fact that they didnt set out to do that particular job. Somewhere along the line, the notion of opportunity was replaced by the expectation of landing a dream job. Thats led to a lot of disappointed people, and a lot of unrealistic expectations.
Philanthropy: Who is your typical scholarship recipient?
Rowe: Theres no age restriction on the Work Ethic Scholarship, but the majority of applicants are in their early twenties. We get a lot of people who are halfway through college, and looking to change course. Some people need $2,500 for a certification. Others need $15,000 of tuition. It depends on what they want to do and where they want to get training. We work with the largest scholarship organization in the country, Scholarship America, which assists many foundations. Its great at vetting the first round of applicants. Then my office goes through them one by one.
Philanthropy: How much have you given personally toward the foundation compared to raising outside funds?
Rowe: About half a million dollars. But the money I put in initially was not nearly as important as the smaller amounts I raised auctioning stuff from my garage. I have a garage full of mementos collected from Dirty Jobs that I autograph and sell to the highest bidder. We call them C.R.A.P. Auctions, which stands for Collectables, Rare And Precious. Basically, my version of a Dirty Jobs telethon. Weve raised a lot of money, but more importantly, weve generated a ton of press. (Jay Leno actually featured some fossilized polar bear poo that went for thousands of dollars.)
Were also supported today by other companies and organizations that share our goals but dont necessarily want to go through the headache of administering a scholarship fund. This Old House, for instance, has a vested interest in seeing more people enter the construction field, but rather than setting up their own program, they said, Why dont we raise money for scholarships and give it to mikeroweWORKS? Three months later, they handed me a check for $500,000. Very cool.
Philanthropy: What are your thoughts on American manufacturing moving toward automation, and what that will do to the availability of jobs?
Rowe: So much has already been written about the advent of robotics and the impact of technology it now seems more historic than futuristic. All I know for sure is that 5.6 million openings currently exist that arent in danger of being filled by robots. Thats a fact thats impacting our economy right now. And those vacancies represent more than opportunity, they represent a threat to national security. We need a skilled and balanced workforce, and right now, we dont have one. As for technology, its always impacted the economy, and it will continue to do so. But currently, the skilled trades are in no danger of being usurped by technology. Carpenters, plumbers, welders, mechanics these jobs are available as we speak. And I suspect they always will be.
Philanthropy: How did your relationship with your grandfather influence your views on work?
Rowe: In every way imaginable. My grandfather could build a house without a blueprint. He only went to school through the seventh grade, but he became a master tradesman by the time he was 30. My hope was to follow in his footsteps, but alas, the handy gene is recessive, and I didnt get the natural ability he was blessed with. Pop was the one who told mewhen it became clear I would never be able to build a house on my ownthat I could still be a tradesman, but only if I got myself a different sort of toolbox. And so I did. I went to a community college and took a theater class. I took singing lessons. I started doing voiceovers and commercial work and hosting all sorts of random shows on various cable channels. I got my new toolbox in order, and went to work in television. Years later, when Pop was 90, my mother called me to say how nice it would be if my grandfather could turn on the television and see me doing something that looked like work. Ultimately, Dirty Jobs came about as a tribute to him.
Philanthropy: Youre an Eagle Scout. I take it the Boy Scouts were a formative influence on you as well?
Rowe: They were. I was shy and withdrawn as a kid. My parents were worried, and forced me to join a gang of local hoodlums who met in the basement of the local church. It was transformational.
Philanthropy: Hoodlums?
Rowe: Well, no. But it felt like that my first night. The kids were rough. The games they playedSwing-the-Thing, British Bill Dog, Capture the Flagwere magnificently violent. There was a boxing ring, where disagreements were settled the old-fashioned way. Bloody noses were a weekly occurrence. But when the Scoutmastera former colonel in the Armyblew his whistle, the level of discipline was amazing. I honestly believe the rigor and the physicality would rival what passes for basic training today.
The Boy Scouts got me out of my comfort zone, thats for sure. Sleeping under the stars, even when it was raining. Forcing me to give speeches even though I had a stammer. Challenging me constantly to master simple skills that I didnt even know existed. But the real benefit, looking back, was not the importance of trying new thingsit was the realization that being uncomfortable was an important part of any worthwhile accomplishment.
Thats been so valuable to me throughout my life. I often credit the Scouts for impacting so much of my career. Since Dirty Jobs started, Ive sent out around 55,000 congratulatory letters to newly-minted Eagles. I also patterned my foundations S.W.E.A.T. pledge after the Scout Law. Truth is, I really think the country needs the Boy Scouts, the Future Farmers of America, and Skills USA. Im glad to sing their praises whenever I can.
Philanthropy: Whats next for you?
Rowe: More of the same. If President Trump is serious about investing a trillion dollars in infrastructure repair, were going to see very quickly just how acute the labor shortage really isespecially in the construction trades. Bolstering the workforce is going to become a matter of national importance, and I suspect the government will probably have to team up with a number of big companies reliant upon a skilled workforce and embark upon a national campaign to help make a case for good jobs that actually exist. If mikeroweWORKS can be of use in that endeavor, Id be happy to help. If not, well stay the course, and keep trying to close the skills gap, one job at a time.
Yes, the show itself has a listing. I wrote that, on Rowe’s IMDB profile, there is no record of him having been on the program.
No, I understood you.
By the tenth grade a majority of students either show a college aptitude and interest or an interest in trade skills. Kids who have zero aptitude for advanced Math,advanced sciences, the upteenth year of English, and now in some states foreign language requirements, cut deep into what Voc/Tech courses are offered. But it gets worse. Block scheduling has kids going to their Voc/Tech course only for one class per half the school year so as to satisfy the other requirements college prep needs.
I'm for apprenticeships and the 10th grade being a 50/50 daily schedule of 50% standard courses and 50% Voc/Tech. Junior and Senior year should allow for full time trades/tech courses even as to encourage dual courses.
Diversity in a persons trade skills and the ability to quickly learn and adapt is a huge plus. By the time I was 28 I had taken a high school Refrigeration course and worked most of my senior year working on car A/C's. From there I joined the Navy four years and those skills got me into the Air Conditioning and Refrigeration shop on ship. After the Navy I took an advanced course in Commercial Refrigeration while drawing a VA check and then worked maintenance at the 1982 Worlds Fair ensuring the A/C units were operating. These were large commercial Centrifugal Chill Water A/C units. Then recession hit our area real hard. I went back and took half a course in Industrial Electricity again drawing a VA check and working in a National Cemetery for more money. I also joined the Army NG when I found yet another skill which was truck driving. A few hundred in tuition and three weeks later I was driving OTR.
After being on the road almost 8 months I stopped due to income issues and took a job in a healthcare facility doing electrical and HVAC maintenance. I later went back and completed the Industrial Electricity course. All jobs I had done up to that point even a brief Boiler Room stint in the Navy I used in my job as a maintenance mechanic. Today if I were a student in high school I would not pass their requirements. The stigma and opposition our education system puts on Voc/Tech training ios a huge factor as well in not having enough workers. It's discouraged. The school with the highest SAT's wins.
“I keep telling my son to get into welding. “
My ex sister in laws son’s daughter went into underwater welding! Imagine, a stunning 5’10’’ Irish redhead doing welding! She lives very well!
A guy I worked with had a son who went into welding and then specialized in welding stainless steel. He could write his own ticket with that skill.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.