Posted on 06/09/2017 9:25:56 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Polygamists abandon their sons, brothers and uncles. They are the scum of the earth.
“I’m not sure I know anything in the Bible that indicates polygamy, as such, is against the Bible” - Pat Robertson
Why then make such a statement if he isn’t “sure”....good grief man do your homework! What a jerk!
I have a family member that likes this guy and so often he gets things wrong....but his ‘fans’ think he walks on water so his fans generally aren’t open to seek further than what he says.
Perhaps Pat in his dotage is trying to come to terms with some long term “indiscretion”.
I should have been clear that the rabbinical ruling in the year 999 was for Ashkenazi (’European’) Jews. The nation of Israel didn’t prohibit new polygamous marriages until 1954 when Mizrahi (’Eastern’) Jews from Central Asian and Arab nations had been emigrating to Israel after 1948.
That didn't end well.
It was not in the original plan for sure and certainly Jesus did not say that it was a good thing. His words were that a man should leave his mother and father and cleave to his wife. Not wives.
Yet because it is not specifically ruled out then it can taken that having more then one wife is acceptable if not the ideal. However the reality of Christianity is that once you are a Christian taking more wives is generally not done.
It falls into the same category as slavery. Once Christianity settles into a culture it starts disappearing.
Slavery begins to vanish because Christians are commanded to treat their slaves justly and slave who are also Christians are to be treated as brothers. You do not sell your brother, you do not take their children from them, you do not force your sister into your bed, you do not beat them to make them work harder. Slavery quickly loses it financial and prurient appeal.
A Christian man is commanded to love his wife, not tolerate her, not put up with her but love her. He is to give her honor. Taking a second wife tears at the first wife's heart. It is not loving to do that. And you can not give equal honor to both wives. He may not take a wife to puff up his ego or as a trophy.
The end result is polygamy loses it's appeal.
So it also begins to vanish.
Not because there are rules against it but because the rules for living a Christian life and having a Christian heart mean that it no longer fits into your manner.
How long before they gang up?
There should be a verse somewhere that simply says, “Dude, you don’t need that kind of punishment!” :)
God certainly didn’t laud it.
On the other hand, divorce, unmarried sex, and lack of a father certainly are specifically condemned many times. Zero people who waste a lot of precious air huffing and puffing over polygamy without putting considerably more effort into eradicating these sins which God condemns over and over have their head overly aligned to the Bible.
“I know the NT says a church leader (a bishop) should be the husband of one wife. Where is there any condemnation or prohibition other than that?”
Matthew 6:26 - “No man can serve two masters”
All joking aside, exactly.
In the OT one of the times when polygamy was EXPRESSLY condoned is when a husband died and his wife was childless. In such cases the man’s brother was to take the woman into his house and have have children for his brother by her.
You can make a better case for polygamy in the Bible than you can for divorce; a much better case!
Abraham, Jacob, David, Solomon and Hezekiah all had multiple wives.
The verse that was thrown at you clearly implies that some men at the time multiple wives and that it was not ideal, and that is why a bishop/elder/pastor/teacher was required to have only one. However, it doesn’t call polygamy sinful either.
BTW, I only have one wife. If I had two like the one I’ve got I’d have been dead years ago.
OMG...why would any man want multiple mother-in-laws?
The article bent what Pat Robertson said. Polygamy was result of mans fall and is first recorded in Cains genealogy Genesis 4:19. Certainly the the king was not to have lots of wives, Deu 17:17 Neither shall he multiply wives to himself, that his heart turn not away: but there is no command not to have multiple wives in the old Testament.
God is also far more concerned with divorce and fatherlessness.
Don’t take offense, do a little reading on the subject. Being a freemason and a Christian evangelist at the same time, as with Pat Robertson, is not compatible. My family had plenty of low level freemasons, but Pat is not a low level guy.
Reverend Charles Finney and President John Quincy Adams were part of the Anti-Mason Party, which became the Whig Party, which morphed into Lincoln’s GOP...
Read what they say about the Masons. You do know that the Freemasons believe September 11 is Christ’s real birthday? Look it up. It’s why they murdered Captain Morgan for becoming a Christian on September 11, 1826 and kickstarted the whole anti-Mason movement in the United States. John Q Adams was an interesting guy.
All this to say, Christianity and Masonry are not compatible.
“Why I left Freemasonry by Rev Charles Finney”
http://www.isaiah54.org/finney.htm
You could marry sisters. LOL
Slavery is a bad comparison, I think. Christianity didn’t really abandon slavery for another 1500 years after the Christian church was founded.
It was The Enlightenment that takes credit for abolition, not Christianity.
what a nice sentiment about women.....really upstanding man aren't you....
whatever....when polygamy becomes common it will mean that 90% of men will not have nooky unless they do it to each other...
the alpha men will have the harems, and most all men will not....
stone age paganism, here we come...
I don’t even want one woman.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.