Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Grease Gun of WW2
Am Shooting Journal ^ | 6/7/2017 | J Certo

Posted on 06/07/2017 10:19:45 AM PDT by w1n1

In this segment of WW2 firearms, two lucky shooters from Iraqveteran8888 Youtuber got a chance to fire the M3A1 "Grease Gun" and in doing so they were in awed by its raw power. Watch as they shoot this historic firearm, showcasing how forceful it still is today.

According to Wikipedia, “The original M3 was an answer to the somewhat complex design and high production cost of the M1A1 Thompson during World War II.” This 'Grease Gun' was made cheaper for WWII, and used actively up until Desert Storm.

Did you notice how accurate the firing was? It was by no means created for precision shooting as it’s main purpose was for area shooting.

This gun was semi accurate up to 75 yards, so if you're looking to get your own soon be sure to shoot within this range. Chambered for the .45ACP cartridge, it is notable for its very low rate of fire – 350-400 rpm, which made it quite controllable and easy to shoot for relatively inexperienced troops. See the rest of the grease gun WW2 footage here.


TOPICS: History; Hobbies; Military/Veterans; Outdoors
KEYWORDS: banglist; m3a1greasegun; treadheads; ww2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

1 posted on 06/07/2017 10:19:45 AM PDT by w1n1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: w1n1

Form follows function.


2 posted on 06/07/2017 10:20:46 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: w1n1

I fired one of these. My impression was that it was possible to hit the broad side of a barn ... if fired from the inside.

/sarc

It is one of those tools that met a need.


3 posted on 06/07/2017 10:22:12 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: w1n1

Can be fabricated at any well equipped machine shop, yes?


4 posted on 06/07/2017 10:23:49 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: w1n1

I remember when you could buy one of these demilled through the mail. A few minutes with a file to remove the weld and you were ready to rock and roll!


5 posted on 06/07/2017 10:25:45 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: w1n1

Bookmark


6 posted on 06/07/2017 10:26:46 AM PDT by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

We had them in our small 40 man Air Force unit in the ‘60’s. I think you could get a faster rate of fire from a 1911! Not even close to an MP 40.


7 posted on 06/07/2017 10:31:20 AM PDT by Bonemaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: w1n1

An old tanker told me his unit was issued Grease Guns during the first Gulf War. Don’t know if that was widespread or is he was just lucky.


8 posted on 06/07/2017 10:31:34 AM PDT by Wyrd bið ful aræd (Flag burners can go screw -- I'm mighty PROUD of that ragged old flag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

The idea was to throw a lot of lead into the air, making it highly hazardous to step into the zone of the spray. This strategy kept the combatants from the other side from advancing through areas without sufficient cover.

Totally different from a “marksman”. Those specialists were expected to aim and place the projectile rather accurately into a specific target.


9 posted on 06/07/2017 10:32:31 AM PDT by alloysteel (Don't worry, nothing is going to be OK. Positive assumption of negative outcome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Can be fabricated at any well equipped machine shop, yes?

It helps if you have the schematic:
10 posted on 06/07/2017 10:37:16 AM PDT by Garth Tater (What's mine is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: w1n1
At least it wasn't the British Sten gun, which made the M3 "Grease Gun" look like a finely-made piece of machinery in comparison.
11 posted on 06/07/2017 10:38:55 AM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: w1n1
I carried one for a week or two while I was in Vietnam. Looked great and was simple to clean - but I realized very quickly that it was completely ineffective past maybe 50 meters and with a loaded magazine weighed exactly the same as my loaded M-14.

Since my M-14 was much more effective at all ranges, I ditched my M3A1.

12 posted on 06/07/2017 10:42:49 AM PDT by Chainmail (A simple rule of life: if you can be blamed, you're responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bonemaker
Yeah, carried one while driving the ordnance truck. Swear I could fire a 1911 as fast. Big arse bolt slamming back and forth had the muzzle going everywhere.

The Thompson was much faster and easier to control.

13 posted on 06/07/2017 10:44:11 AM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
IIRC, it was made by the GM headlamp division, stamped out, for the most part, save for the machined bolt, barrel, and firing mechanism.

It was also field convertible to fire German 9mm SMG rounds.

14 posted on 06/07/2017 10:47:25 AM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: w1n1

I remember one of the Call of Duty games this thing was just no contest hands down the best indoor/alley gun in the game.

Couple that with best sniper weapon in the same game, Mosin–Nagant, you had the possibility of running the table on any map.


15 posted on 06/07/2017 10:51:15 AM PDT by PittsburghAfterDark (The American media: We do what the Soviet media did without the guns to our head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

The local range has a “Machine Gun Night” a couple of times a year.

Fun gun.


16 posted on 06/07/2017 10:58:16 AM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (MAGA!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: w1n1
This was still standard issue when I was in. You couldn't qualify on it because it wasn't accurate enough to hit targets that could be counted. It was sure fun to shoot, though.

If it ever got down to bad guys within 75 feet I would have used my 1911 because I could hit a target with that.

17 posted on 06/07/2017 10:59:13 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: w1n1

Carried one of these in the field for awhile.

One word: Boat Anchor. (well, maybe two words)

The little thing by itself wasn’t heavy but steel magazines full of .45 ACP made for a load.

Utterly reliable and a great brush chopper.


18 posted on 06/07/2017 10:59:42 AM PDT by x1stcav (White. Male. Unreconstructed. Never owned a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chainmail
“I carried one for a week or two while I was in Vietnam.”

I used to see Montagnards carrying those. I always wondered where they got them.

19 posted on 06/07/2017 11:00:03 AM PDT by beelzepug (Anybody I attack may rest assured it's personal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69

My late father trained on one in the Army. Said it was very controllable with its slow rate of fire and straight back stock.

Key to making it shoot straight was NOT to hold the wire stock firmly against you shoulder but sort of let it bounce off as the bolt moved forward. The recoil would bounce it back and you could walk the fire into any target is a short time.

Never fired the M3 but did fire a M1A1 made by savage. frankly I did far better with hits at 25 M on repetition setting than on the automatic setting. The Thompson has excessive drop in the stock and with the higher rate of fire, well it seemed to have excessive vertical dispersion. On the repetition setting, with that slight stabilizing influence of time, you would get more hits past 25 M than with full auto on a 20 W by 30 H pistol target.


20 posted on 06/07/2017 11:01:58 AM PDT by Frederick303
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson