Posted on 04/03/2017 9:05:49 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
So they have to destroy his credibility before he comes forth with the full evidence . . . which he's going to do.
I told you last month, when President Trump first accused his predecessor of wiretapping him, that the news media would be interested in any information that might confirm Obama and/or his administration had wrongly spied on Team Trump. What they would do instead, I told you, was act as Obama’s lawyer - demanding that Trump himself prove his precise, literal charge rather than doing any of their own reporting designed to find out if something like what Trump alleged had actually happened.
That’s one way defense attorneys defend their clients - they parse words and nitpick with literalisms. Maybe he did something wrong, but you said something very literal and specific and you can’t prove he did that. Case dismissed!
Sure seems it.
That’s what I’ve been saying.
It’s an old Democrat tactic.
They knew what was coming down, so they used their one-play playbook:
“Destroy the messenger so the message is not believed.”......................
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.