Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/16/2017 6:49:34 AM PDT by w1n1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: w1n1

Could you survive three AR15 rounds to the chest?

_________________________________________________

No. Next question.


2 posted on 03/16/2017 6:51:53 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1

Given their weight, velocity, and kinetic energy displacement when it hits something, and considering what all that does to a human body, I would give it a resounding “no.”


3 posted on 03/16/2017 6:53:53 AM PDT by jbrown7.62x39 (Holy crap. We really are gonna MAGA!! What a great time to be alive!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1
Could you survive three AR15 rounds to the chest?

Are you looking for volunteers ?

4 posted on 03/16/2017 6:56:01 AM PDT by Popman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1

From the first Ar-15, 1 in 14 twist, no. one will do the job.
Later 1 in 12 twist, no.
Late 1 in 9 twist, good question. Europeans got the bad idea that a fragmenting bullet was bad.

One thing I never understood about the ban on soft nose Dum-Dum bullets, in the military you can burn the enemy, blow him to pieces, hack him to pieces, run over him with a tank tread, but you can’t shoot him with a soft nosed bullet as it is “inhumane”.


5 posted on 03/16/2017 6:57:51 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1

From what I’ve been hearing, the 5.56 wasn’t designed to kill. It was designed to wound.
That way, it would make the enemy forces have to use personnel to extract the wounded from the field -meaning less people available for the fight.


6 posted on 03/16/2017 6:57:55 AM PDT by RandallFlagg (Vote for your guns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

It does not make a clean cut. So, no, you are not likely to live. That is unless the enemy is a lousy shot.


8 posted on 03/16/2017 7:05:00 AM PDT by jr3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1

Smithsonian video concludes...so it just wasn’t Hollywood fiction. Ya think?? LOL...what idiots.


11 posted on 03/16/2017 7:12:00 AM PDT by WKUHilltopper (WKU 2016 Boca Raton Bowl Champions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1
LaVoy Finicum autopsy report.

This wasn't a movie. Shot 3 times at close range. Once in the front shoulder and twice in the back by 2 different shooters. He didnt make it.

17 posted on 03/16/2017 7:34:05 AM PDT by Delta 21 (The minority demands NOTHING !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1
Interesting.

Gel shows the wound but a human has bones, hard and soft tissue and dense organs so the actual path of a projectile is inexplicably hard to predict.

Secondly I thought the 5.56 'tumble' has been proven a myth?

19 posted on 03/16/2017 8:03:38 AM PDT by djone (Any fool can criticize, condemn, and complain - and most fools do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1

I hope so.


20 posted on 03/16/2017 8:18:16 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1

I’ve seen a guy survive one 50 cal round to the chest and survive, so I guess anything is possible.


21 posted on 03/16/2017 8:22:13 AM PDT by dangerdoc (disgruntled)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1

Having shot about everything four and two legged in North America(with many different caliber weapons) I will say that anything is possible when it come to bullet results.


24 posted on 03/16/2017 8:31:46 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Watching Obama tap dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1

Three rounds of anything to the chest is going to mess you up, if not outright kill you where you stand.


32 posted on 03/16/2017 9:45:23 AM PDT by factoryrat (We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it. MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1

Depending on placement, not likely. However, it would be great to get the “tumbling” part of the description removed from parlance.

The 5.56 round, with a few exceptions and twist rate considered, is pretty stable in flight. Considering that class of cartridge is primarily dedicated to blowing up wood-chucks, prairie-dogs, coyotes, and other vermin out to 300 yards. That kind of accuracy does not come from a round tumbling, but from spinning with a high degree of concentricity and manufacturing uniformity.

The description of explosive wounds come from the round’s tendency to deflect once it encounters something strong enough to deflect the nose. The 55 Gr slug has a balance point close to the rear third of the slug...Bigger relative lever to deflect the point. When the point is deflected, more surface area of the slug presents along the path of the projectile causing a larger more jagged wound channel/exit.

While it may be possible to live through three non-deflected hits which didn’t rupture the heart, circulatory, or breathing systems (still a considerable amount of hydrostatic shock from those rounds), it is doubtful.

Don’t stand in front of trigger happy riflemen?

KYPD


33 posted on 03/16/2017 10:57:04 AM PDT by petro45acp (" It IS About Islam: exposing the truth about ISIS, Al Qaeda, Iran, and the caliphate" by Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w1n1

Chuck Norris says: “Heck, ya!”


35 posted on 03/16/2017 12:39:52 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Abortion is what slavery was: immoral but not illegal. Not yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson