Posted on 02/02/2017 8:12:12 AM PST by Sean_Anthony
SB 54 specifically prohibits almost all cooperation and communication with federal immigration authorities.
In the California State Senate Monday, Senate President Pro Tem Kevin de Léon (D-Los Angeles) and fellow Democrats passed Senate Resolution 16, condemning President Donald J. Trump’s recent executive order restricting travel from terror-prone countries and suspending the refugee program.
The text of the resolution declares that Trump’s executive order “desecrates our American values and panders to fears and nativist instincts that have resulted in some of our nation’s most shameful acts.”
Looks like we’ll need to include California on the other side of the wall.
No mention of the fact that it’s LEGAL and within the purview of POTUS.
Give California the big freeze.
So the next time an Illegal murders someone in a sanctuary city, can DJT declare martial law there, and send in the national guard?
I am thinking border patrol should just abandon the actual border, and go to the eastern CA state line, instead.
Wall Cali off already- lets be done with their liberalism.
Another bad idea from Sacramento
Are there any responsible adults left in Ca?
I have stoped looking for jobs in California. It’s just too far to the left for me.
Not so fast. According to a survey released last week over 70% of California residents are against sanctuary cities and illegal immigration. And that is across the board (Republicans, Democrats, and all ethnic groups). So, it confuses me as to why they are doing this since the vast majority of residents are against it.
Your guess is as good as mine.
So has anyone compiled a list of where officials can not travel to? Or is it better to just say they can just travel across the road to Mexico?
As I was writing the above, it dawned on me that Mexico might just be stealing California from right under our noses as they had planned and hoped as they believe the land is somehow theirs because it was stolen just like the Palestinkians.
Not on the Dem benches in Sacramento.
FedGov spends $344B a year in California, 11% of all federal spending. I’d like to see federal spending cut by more than 11%. I’m okay with California accepting the natural consequences of lawlessness.
****nativist instincts that have resulted in some of our nation’s most shameful acts.”****
So the native Indians were committing shameful acts. Got it.
I missed that survey, could you post it or let us know who did it? I’d love to shove it some peoples’ faces!
How soon until businesses start moving out of California as not to want to have to pay for the border tax and import duties to the UNITED States of America?
Sure. Here is the link:
http://news.berkeley.edu/2015/09/04/igs-poll-californians-oppose-sanctuary-city-flexibility/
From the article:
The online survey, which polled 1,098 California residents from Aug. 11-26, found that 74 percent of respondents said local authorities should not be able to ignore a federal request to hold a detained person who is in the country illegally. Only 26 percent of respondents said local authorities should have that right.
Opposition to the sanctuary city policies crossed the political spectrum, and included 73 percent of Democrats, 82 percent of Republicans and 71 percent of independents.
Has anyone asked them why they thought it was OK when obozo and carter did the same?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.