Posted on 01/03/2017 4:42:44 AM PST by gaggs
Here’s an explanation for Islamic terrorism that’s never suggested. A never-spoken-about problem with Muslims is their inbreeding as a result of their long and deeply ingrained practice of marrying first cousins — a practice that has been prohibited in the Judeo-Christian tradition since the days of Moses.
(Excerpt) Read more at commonsenseevaluation.com ...
Actually, it's been suggested many times. But always worth mentioning again.
BTW - it's your blog, why not post the rest here?
Thanks for posting the maps. A picture tells a thousand stories.
Happy to be living in a field of yellow!
I watched a friends beautiful little Greek girl die from thalassemia mediterranean blood disease before genetic testing had become routinely advised.
“It was Roosevelt. She married a cousin too.”
Somewhere in the past I read they were first cousins, but that’s quite wrong.
They were fifth cousins, once removed.
And I would bet that most people, if they studied their ancestry carefully enough, will find at least one example of fifth or closer cousins marrying.
Just consider, in small towns over many generations, nearly everyone is somehow related.
Not to minimize the Islamic problem, but closer relationships are, or at least were, not so unusual.
Not a problem, thanks for the link to it. I am with you, the image tells the story.
My first crush was with a vacationing first cousin and the feelings were mutual. We had no idea that it should be a problem and were beginning to hold hands,
The parents were all clueless, but both of our older sisters caught on and harassed (punched) us to stop. They made sure that we were never left alone together.
Interesting.
In a related matter, I wonder whether the inbreeding produces more bad genes in the genetic pool, or merely more defective individuals who are defective by virtue of possessing two copies of the defective genes.
In other words, perish the thought, should these Koranimals magically become westernized and stop consanguinous (sp?) marriages, would the rest of the gene pool be harmed by an influx of bad genes, or would the level of genetic abnormality return to “normal?”
And not surprisingly that correlates well with IQ level by country....
https://iq-research.info/en/page/average-iq-by-country
Also note, the “sweet spot” for violent and criminal behavior is right around IQ of 80. Any lower and too stupid to be criminal but low enough to remove any inhibitions....
Yes, it would seem that a recessive gene that is normally culled out from the gene pool has gained dominance by inbreeding. Now, it is a multiplier and it’s more likely to be passed along to the offspring of those who breed with them.
It would be good for them, but bad for us.
A married couple who are known to have serious genetic markers for abnormalities are better off harvesting a donor egg or sperm from elsewhere to eliminate the possibility.
IOW, if you fall in love with an inbred muslim, don’t pass it along and create a third victim.
Excellent story, thank you. I especially loved the last lines.
This is a taboo subject—I’ve been pointing it out here on a regular basis since 9/11. The other horrific taboo subject is the mutilations that little girls in Islam suffer. This is the ugliest culture that has ever existed.
Redfreedom, that is the globalist elite plan- dumb everyone down, over time.
Consanguinity rates in Arab populations (2009). Minimum and maximum reported rates are indicated when available:
This explains a lot of the problems in the Middle East, right here.
Overall consanguinity
Algeria.... 22.6-34
Bahrain.... 39.4-45.5
Egypt.... 39-47.2
Egypt(Nubia).. 60.5-80.4
Iraq....... 47-60
Jordan.... 28.5-63.7
Kuwait... 22.5-64.3
Lebanon... 12.8-42
Libya.... 48.4
Mauritania...47.2
Morocco... 19.9-28
Oman.... 56.3
Palestine... 17.5-66.3
Qatar... 54
Saudi Arabia... 42.1-66.7
Sudan.... 44.2-63.3
Syria... 30-39.8
Tunisia... 20.1-39.3
Untd Arab Emirates...40-54.2
Yemen... 40-44.7
In mathematical terms, consanguinity does not alter the allele frequencies of common disorders, but increases the probability of a mating between two individual heterozygotes for the same recessive mutant allele. In this regard, the risk for birth defects in the offspring of first-cousin marriage is expected to increase sharply compared to non-consanguineous marriages particularly for rare autosomal recessive disease genes, because for common recessive conditions, there is a high chance that the abnormal gene may be carried by unrelated spouses and may be expressed in their progeny.
http://reproductive-health-journal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1742-4755-6-17
What percentage for a Muslim who ancestry of first cousins goes back 70 generations? Imagine sharing a set of grandparents, who themselves share grandparent—and then lots of swapping around for 1400 years...would live to see DNA analyzed. For those who read the Bible—we may have among us purely genetic representations of Ishmael and nephew Esau!
Wonder what US ghetto rates are compared to 40-50 years ago...? Seems rates of genetic problems would increase with the immoral behavior passing genes around indiscriminately ...some kid could grow up and marry his half sister without knowing it.
No, and that's why you see so few four-legged Muslims.
Brent Tarleton: Why honey, you can’t do that to us. How about if we tell you a secret?
Scarlett O’Hara: A secret? Who about?
Stuart Tarleton: You know Miss Melanie Hamilton from Atlanta?
Brent Tarleton: Ashley Wilkes’ cousin. She’s visiting the Wilkes.
Scarlett O’Hara: Melanie Hamilton! That goody-goody! Who wants to know a secret about her?
Stuart Tarleton: Anyway, we heard, that is, they say...
Brent Tarleton: Ashley Wilkes is gonna marry her. The Wilkeses always marry their cousins.
Stuart Tarleton: Now do we get those waltzes?
Scarlett O’Hara: Of course.
Brent Tarleton quote: The other boys will be hopping mad.
Stuart Tarleton: Let them be mad. We can handle them!
Scarlett O’Hara: It can’t be true. Ashley loves me.
It’s not a taboo subject on FR and it should not be anywhere else. It is really sad to see babies born with a myriad of disorders and terminal health issues that could easily have been avoided.
While one can possibly expect familial sex and cousin marriage within highly isolated populations of the past, it is now completely unnecessary and preventable.
All of the research and the genetic mishaps have been there for all to see, they refuse to learn and change their incestual ways. The fact that consanguinity has increased dramatically in Iran, is quite troubling. They were supposed to be the really smart ones in the Middle East. It’s shameful.
But thanks for the hint. YOUR word is far more concise.
I have a first-cousin-marriage in my extended family. One of the offspring is now institutionalized. SUCH a shame.
That’s very observant. That chart posted at #38 is based on normed Western standards. It obviously does not take into account 1400 years of incestual ME breeding.
It’s likely there are studies that have compared the similarity of DNA composition between first cousins in the extreme cases of severe congenital abnormalities among siblings somewhere in the ME.
Rather than first cousins sharing 12.5% of the DNA in the Middle East, it’s likely approaching at least 25%, if not closer to 30-40% of the DNA.
If they keep it up, first cousins doubly or 20X related for generations will become the equivalent of marrying their sister.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.