[BraveMan]

Not a safe assumption.

It is my understanding they didn’t count any of the absentee ballots because the difference between the two major candidates was too large to trigger the count.

[kabar]

It is my understanding they didn’t count any of the absentee ballots because the difference between the two major candidates was too large to trigger the count.

Wrong. They must count all the ballots regardless. All absentee ballots are counted.

[45Auto]

So in the first so-called "certified" count, these absentee ballots were not counted - at all? Is the number of total absentee ballots known? What, they just dumped the absentees in a big box and never even counted the total? I call BS on that; violates the chain of "evidence". How the hell did the SoS certify without these absentee ballots? Am I missing something here? If the total ballot count after the recount is substantially higher than the first "certified" count, who the hell would not think that massive fraud had occurred during the recount?