To: BraveMan
So in the first so-called "certified" count, these absentee ballots were not counted - at all? Is the number of total absentee ballots known? What, they just dumped the absentees in a big box and never even counted the total? I call BS on that; violates the chain of "evidence". How the hell did the SoS certify without these absentee ballots? Am I missing something here? If the total ballot count after the recount is substantially higher than the first "certified" count, who the hell would not think that massive fraud had occurred during the recount?
42 posted on
12/05/2016 4:34:53 PM PST by
45Auto
(Big holes are (almost) always better.)
To: 45Auto
Note to Self: Search, then post.
I can’t find anything to back that post up. Plus others have corrected me. Perhaps it was the practice in local elections I’m misremembering.
As I understand it now, (from what I’ve read so far) the absentee ballots were counted the next day. That was the practice in Milwaukee, anyway . . .
46 posted on
12/05/2016 4:52:38 PM PST by
BraveMan
To: 45Auto
The absentee ballots were already counted once.
47 posted on
12/05/2016 4:53:12 PM PST by
kabar
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson