Krauthammer has lost all credibility.
All his NeoCon friends are fading fast from history.
Causes one to wonder what the politicians in those sanctuary cities are getting and who they are getting it from.
Sounds like some deep investigations into those politicians might be in order — including offshore bank accounts and financial dealings.
Time for him to retire.
He, Megyn Kelly, and the other NeverTrumpers need to exit stage left.
Rahm allah ding dong will fold like a faggot ...
I remember a guy named Krauthammer. He used to be on one of the Fox News shows. Maybe he still is. What I remember about him is that you could take everything he said about who was going to win the 2016 Presidential election to the bank.
But before banking it you had take his input and multiply it by -1 (or, for the math whiz Freepers, add 180 degrees to it.) The reason for this correction was due to the fact he was almost exactly wrong on all his election pronouncements and predictions.
This is a valuable guy to have around as long as you know the -1 or the 180 degree trick.
Is this national review and Charlie K crawling back to the fold?
The original talking head.
F him
I don’t listen to Krauthammer anymore. He outed himself as a global Unipartiest and no longer has even a semi-legitimate claim to be a “conservative”, or even given anyone a claim why anyone should listen to him.
Krauthammer has now been added to my LONG list of talking heads that get DVR-skipped on FNC shows when they start to talk. Such skipping keeps the BP down and not surprisingly makes watching the whole panoply of FNC shows a very rapid exercise, especially since I no longer DVR even half the shows.
The cities will be brave ... until the federal funds run out.
Since when have the democrats used any ‘common sense’ about anything? I really don’t think they have since JFK days.
The Rats dream of demographic takeover of this country might go down in flames for a long time, so they are doubling down, with puffery and bluster and Linda Graham.
E-verify reaches across city boundaries. If it is uneconomical to be an illegal in this country, sanctuary cities can’t keep them here. They will leave on their own.
With this sanctuary city stuff the Dems are teeing up a perfect battle for Trump to win in his first 100 days.
Thats why I think its smart of Trump to start of with the obvious criminal element of the illegals here. Sanctuary city wants to keep them? They are aiding and abetting dangerous felons.
Once we get a handle on illegal voting, this will be much less of an issue.
Dem mayors DEPEND on that illegal vote to stay in office, the illegals push them over the top, therefore they are their constituency.
Go to some sort of federal voting ID law, and watch these mayors discard the illegals in quick fashion. When it is only American citizens who can vote, you will see a major change in pandering. I look forward to a day when politicians begin pandering to Americans first.
Pssssssssst...Charles...take Karl Rove with you....
“I think Trump would be within his rights to withhold funds...”
Gregg Jarrett on Fox is a lawyer and he showed Federal law that states harboring illegal aliens is a felony with a penalty of up to 10 years in prison.
So what’s with this “withhold funds” crap? Arrest the mayors and traipse them off to be tried in Federal court, and then to the hoosegow. They’re blatant scofflaws and need to be locked up.
Gonna be a LOT of rude awakenings once Trump starts following his oath and enforcing the law....