Posted on 11/14/2016 5:01:19 PM PST by grey_whiskers
CNN reporter tells me Hillary became physically violent towards Robby Mook and John Podesta around midnight; had to be briefly restrained.
And as I posted on another thread where this alleged incident was mentioned:
We may see "tell all" books from Hillary's aides soon. After all, their cash flow from the Clinton Foundation will be drying up.
That old pass out Gal still has some fight in her.
Honestly, I think that once a sentence is ended such as 36 months prison, etc. That all your rights should be restored. I don’t think we should be forcing people into therapy, or rehab, or any compelled “treatment.”
However, with that said I think “some” crimes should have lifetime bans. Such as murder, assault with a deadly weapon, rape, etc. But lesser crimes like “Armed Robbery” should have a stipulation that you keep your gun rights, but if you are convicted of any other crime then you lose it for life.
The question is loaded. If you’re a violent criminal you’re going to use guns regardless of not being allowed to.
But I think that some crimes go so far that the government has a duty to do whatever they think they can do to make law abiding citizens feel “safer.”
Because that’s all “felon in possession of a firearm” crimes do, is make people feel safe. Hardcore felons don’t GAF, and will use and carry weapons. One time felons who will never commit another felony and learned their lesson may want to own firearms, but they can’t, so they don’t. I think it does more harm than good. But in some circumstances it’s a no-brainer....I think. I’m completely open to discussion about felons and 2nd amendment rights and I’m on the fence but leaning in the “It’s a right not a privilege” camp and once your sentence is up your rights are fully restored. None of this punishing you for life BS. All that does is builds a big economy around keeping people in the system and not really rehabilitating anyone. Which is what the criminal justice system is today. A complete and utter joke.
That sick old man would be much flabbier than that.
It’s OK...Bill never lit his cigars anyway. He had other uses for them.
A member of the detail back in the Clinton days told me they actually had discussions about when they should step in to physically protect the President from Hillary.
Bill knows. He was in the bar, hooking up.
Nothing worse than a brain damaged alcoholic megalomaniac with no job prospects and no dynasty while Alzheimer’s looms.
Oh, I love this. Meanwhile, at around midnight on election night, I and several family members, became very giddy and happy (as I think most Freepers did!)
In other news, water is wet.
.... although Podesta had it coming. What a butt ugly idiot that guy is.
around her ashtrays are frisbees.
just one good punch square in that mush mouth. shed be down for months.
Cankles was not mentally or physically able to become CiC.
Thank you Lord.
5.56mm
could’be an old photo before he ‘got healthy’.
hells bells....that twitter thread is incredible.
i think if you commit a gun crime no more guns for you. they have proven they cant be trusted with one. since we dont actually execute people anymore and hence, cannot deal with them question of them ever being armed again in that way, i say since they still get to breathe and be around civilized folks, that is the rest of their lifetime cost they pay to protect the rest of society from them.
He might be cheating.Oh nevermind.
She was either crying or violent. There has to be a reason she didn’t show up to speak.
Somebody could wear a wire.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.