Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: stolinsky

Why did everyone reject Ted Cruz? I know people are p*ssed at him because of his not endorsing Trump, but prior to that, there was little support here.

I thought the guy was 100% true conservative, and Christian. And he knew the Constitution, history and the issues inside out. He could have run circles around Hillary in the upcoming debates.


4 posted on 08/28/2016 9:12:08 PM PDT by Joann37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Joann37

Because he is a total fraud, a liar, and a pure egomaniac.

He is nothing more than a ladder climber.

And on top of all of that, he is quite possibly the most unlikable person in this country next to Hillary Clinton.

And he couldn’t run circles around anyone in a debate.


5 posted on 08/28/2016 9:17:25 PM PDT by chris37 (How do you make Republicans turn on their own candidate? Sneak up behind them and say "Boo".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Joann37

Canadian born, not eligible to the office.

Had a strange voice, stranger look, and people just didn’t like him.

As an attorney, he knew he was not eligible. But he ran anyway. How can you trust a man like that?

FWIW, I liked a lot of what he said and represented. He could be a good force in our government or for that matter, outside of it.


6 posted on 08/28/2016 9:17:50 PM PDT by JT Hatter (Who is Barack Obama? And What is He Really Up To?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Joann37

“Why did everyone reject Ted Cruz?”

Because he’s a phony. /Holden Caulfield

Turns out he’s a moral leper without a principle, a vertebra, or a testicle to his name.


8 posted on 08/28/2016 9:21:47 PM PDT by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Joann37

I was intrigued by Cruz. I wasn’t sure he was eligible. When he locked up his records, his eligibility immediately became questionable in my mind. That was the end of that.


10 posted on 08/28/2016 9:23:49 PM PDT by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Joann37

Sending “Voter Violations” notices to potential voters (and their neighbors) in Iowa.....his people saying Ben Carson dropped out of the race before the Iowa caucus when Carson had not.....blaming Trump supporters for the Soros-funded riot in Chicago which caused a Trump rally to be cancelled....calling Trump supporters “uneducated” and “uniformed”....his campaign manager buying 16-year old modeling photos of Melania and distributing them in Utah before the primary; just a few things which come to mind.


11 posted on 08/28/2016 9:29:06 PM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (You can't spell TRIUMPH without TRUMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Joann37
Cruz had a ton of support here. My family gave over double to Cruz than we have to Trump for the presidential race.

Jim was initially only Cruz, but after Trump started speaking out on immigration and the rest, he softened to Cruz and Trump.

That was too much for many Cruzers, who could not understand how any conservative could support Trump.

13 posted on 08/28/2016 9:34:32 PM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Joann37

He is a liar. He ran around for months saying Donald supports Obamacare, Donald wants single-payer, socialized healthcare for every American, Donald calls for violence at all his rallies, Donald told the New York Times he will not build a wall,Donald said he intends to appoint his liberal sister to the Supreme Court, etc.


16 posted on 08/28/2016 9:42:21 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Joann37

>>>He could have run circles around Hillary in the upcoming debates<<<

Could be, but he couldn’t even run circles around 16 other Republicans at the Primary Debates.

He had to defend his wanting to increase H1-B Visas by 500%, his role in allowing Bills to go the floor rather than being stopped in Committee and his lukewarm Immigration stance including him chiding Trump for wanting to get rid of the Anchor Baby “loophole” claiming it required a Constitutional Amendment which it does not.

He made numerous errors in Judgment during his Campaign, but his Speech at the RNC Convention was the nail in the Coffin for people thinking he should have been the Nominee.

BTW - I’m a former Cruzer.


17 posted on 08/28/2016 9:43:08 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Hillary Clinton has killed FIVE* more People than Three Mile Island. *revised...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Joann37
Canadian-born, therefore not eligible. And I know he can't help it, but he just looks and sounds odd. Trump's hair is goofy, and he knows it and owns it. Cruz is strange in an unlikable way.

He's supposedly a great constitutionalist, and yet ran for POTUS knowing he is ineligible by birth -- got greedy. He pandered too much to what he thought sounded the most authentically conservative. Conservatives are big fans of states' rights, yes? So he goes and says that securing the border is a states' issue and the states along the border should be responsible for it! Nice try Ted.

Further, he is supposedly a great debater. I thought he was. But Trump whipped him in the primary debates. Wrung him and hung him out to dry. If Cruz can't out-debate Trump, he probably isn't that great of a debater.

I could go on, but those are issues off the top of my head. Out of everyone running, I wouldn't trust anyone more on the issues of life, religious freedom, and the 2nd Amendment...Admittedly, these are the most important things. But without effectively securing the border and making the GOP competitive in more states, we will lose on these issues and every other issue. Trump can do those things, and will, God willing, be sufficient on life, freedom and 2A.

Praying that Trump wins, in which case one of those vacant SCOTUS seats will hopefully go to Cruz, because he can do the most good on the issues he is best at, for much longer than were he in the White House.

20 posted on 08/28/2016 10:21:18 PM PDT by Wyrd bið ful aræd (Police Lives Matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Joann37
Why did everyone reject Ted Cruz?

He was, and is, 100% unelectable (possible exception of Texas, we shall see in his Senate race). America won't tolerate a hardcore Christian, not least because we believe in Armageddon.

21 posted on 08/28/2016 10:23:47 PM PDT by Migraine (Diversity is great -- until it happens to YOU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Joann37

He was a creep, a liar, and a creep.

He flew with Hillary/Obama and who knows what conversations went on during that flight, “Help us destroy Trump and we’ll get you the nomination in 2020.” I imagine something like that. Plus money.


22 posted on 08/28/2016 10:26:18 PM PDT by FreedomStar3028 (Somebody has to step forward and do what is right because it is right, otherwise no one will follow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Joann37

After hearing just a few of his campaign speeches, it became clear Cruz wasn’t honest.


25 posted on 08/28/2016 10:41:05 PM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Joann37

Cruz campaign was caught 5 times doing this:

1. Attempt to steal Carson’s votes in Iowa

2. Photoshop Ad about Rubio and Obama

3. Phony Ad about Rubio comment on the bible

4. Phony push poll Ads in SC about Trump.

5. Failed to declare very low interest loans from Goldman Sachs.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cd7CWXkUUAAyu62.jpg


26 posted on 08/28/2016 11:19:07 PM PDT by entropy12 (Majority of Politicians are either Globalists pushing cheap labor express or are Neocons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Joann37
Why did everyone reject Ted Cruz? I know people are p*ssed at him because of his not endorsing Trump, but prior to that, there was little support here.

Hi Joann37, we supported Ted Cruz right through January. Our problems came from the reported and confirmed issues with how his campaign was being run, the behavior of his people and his responses to bad behavior of his people. We were disappointed that he fell into the the "Trump attack trap" that was so completely obvious to many of us donating to his campaign. It was a desperate act out of bad campaign management. Later, he confirmed our fears with his childlike responses to Trump winning.

Finally when he withheld his endorsement of Trump, we wrote him off forever. There is something irrational compelling his behavior and if there is one thing that sticks out to me with many people, it's dysfunctional behavior. We really try to avoid the bad ones. It really showed here. I don't want to support him any more following what he revealed about himself during the campaign.

29 posted on 08/29/2016 3:49:43 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Joann37
Why did everyone reject Ted Cruz? I know people are p*ssed at him because of his not endorsing Trump, but prior to that, there was little support here.

I thought the guy was 100% true conservative, and Christian. And he knew the Constitution, history and the issues inside out. He could have run circles around Hillary in the upcoming debates.


We just got past the point where Cruz was invoked in a negative way, and as a former Cruz supporter I suggested this was not helpful.

This is NOT the time to bring up "why didn't we support Cruz?" Cruz did NOT help his own efforts by suggesting that Trump was responsible for lefties disrupting Trump events. He also did not fully denounce Liz Mairs' freelance attacks on Melania Trump. Finally, his "vote your conscience" bit at the convention was the wrong play.

Do these have to do with policy? No. But this is not 1996, and supporting Trump does not mean abandoning Cruz full spectrum conservativism for the long haul. Pence is an EXCELLENT representative of full-spectrum conservatism without primary baggage.

Trump's list of Supreme Court picks is solid. Trump is a nationalist, and has no designs to cut conservatives out in the process of remaking the Republican brand, which means kicking out the Bushes and the Romneys, and embracing a more populist/nationalist tone.

After President Trump gets sworn in, we have an opportunity to keep those snobby, snotty apparatchiks and their money once and for all.
31 posted on 08/29/2016 5:42:45 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("I'm a Contra."--President Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Joann37
My lack of support was simple. I could not support someone who was clearly NOT a Natural Born Citizen for president just because he had an -R after his name. I have spent eight years pointing out that Obama was not eligible for that exact same reason.

I may be a bit strange but I will not be a hypocrite.

37 posted on 08/29/2016 6:51:36 AM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Proud Infidel, Gun Nut, Religious Fanatic and Freedom Fiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Joann37

Cruz is a fraud & a globalist who revealed his true nature during the primaries. Thanks be to God Trump crushed him & gave him the platform at the convention to sabotage his political career.

Vote Trump 2016


38 posted on 08/29/2016 6:57:13 AM PDT by TheStickman (Trump will be the 1st Pro America president since Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Joann37
He could have run circles around Hillary in the upcoming debates.

Those that he ran around D trump were not circles.

He looked good on paper, the perfect model. Then he went and opened his mouth....

40 posted on 08/29/2016 7:16:24 AM PDT by going hot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Joann37

“I thought the guy was 100% true conservative, and Christian.”

He was none of those things.

- - - -

“And he knew the Constitution, history and the issues inside out”

Maybe he KNEW the Constitution, but he ignored it, considering his birthplace.

- - - - -

“He could have run circles around Hillary in the upcoming debates.”

His debating skills are greatly exaggerated. He was a TERRIBLE debater in the primaries. Terrible! Maybe he did well in college debates when the subject was narrow and he had time to study. When the topics are broad and varied, and he must think quickly on his feet, he chokes. Once again: He sucked in the primary debates. Hillary would eat him for lunch.


56 posted on 08/30/2016 5:08:21 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson