Cruz abandoned his own party.
Go Trump.
levin loses. He was for Lyin’ ted. He blew it. We don’t listen any more. Rush wisely walked the tight rope . I THINK HE SURVIVED IN THE ENTERTAINMENT REALM. Beck is gone and levin is gone. Savage and Laura now sit in command.
I’d rather win on my principles not lose because of them. Mark, you and the rest of them may lose but you’ll still have your principles. Those and 2 bucks will buy you a cup of coffee.
Levin has become a bore. Ted Cruz lost, it’s over. Lecturing us on how we should have been smart enough to pick him, over and over and over and over and over, is not worth listening to. Maybe I’ll tune him back in after the election is over. Maybe not.
Levin never did apologize for publishing an article BLACKLISTING people who support Trump.
That is about 1000000x more of a scandal than Trump making some joke involving a guy who lost a primary
Levin — SUCH a genius.
Yet now it seems he is finished.
I’m shocked.
Levin is dead meat to me. No more.
Levin’s become a very bitter man. I too don’t listen to him anymore as it’s just a daily Trump bash from him.
Good riddance Levin.
Mark goes Richard Dreyfus ? I personally trust no polidiot on any side. I think they should be monitored 24/7.
But I’m against Hillary 100% and Trump is the last hope to defeat her. Mark just lost me as a listener if he’s gonna provide aid and comfort to the GOPe and The Democrats...
My opinion
Listened to 52 seconds.
‘Why are you attacking? Do you want to get Hillary elected.’
Levin asked that? He has been doing exactly that since February. He has one choice — Trump. Otherwise, it is Hillary. No inbetweens. No Cruz. No Johnson. It is Hillary or Trump.
==
According to talkstreamlive.com, Levin has lost around 45% of his online streaming audience since the 4th quarter of 2015.
Levin may not care, but station managers and advertisers certainly do. Stations are losing revenue and advertisers will be demanding lower ad rates.
Mark Levin has always sort of creeped me out. I never could stand his whiney voice. I dislike him even more now.
He’s spent far more time attacking Trump than he as Hillary. He can bite it.
FYML
Cruz said vote your conscious instead of endorsing Trump. So I guess letting the crook Hillary win to appoint up to 4 U.S. Supreme Court Justices in your pea brain mind is voting your conscious.....
Your boy Cruz, who will not vote for Trump, broke his agreement, because his feelings were hurt after he attacked Trump’s wife first. Oh yeah conveniently forgot that little fact Mark?
You can forget 2020 too, because the Texas Republican Party is looking to replace Cruz in 2018 when his Senate seat is up. If Cruz loses in the Primaries, then you can forget 2020.
Cruz is all hat and no cattle.
I love how this $hit Mark always says Trump had more votes against him. No Mark he did not, and that’s why Trump won.
Then Mark always likes to add well if you add up all the numbers. That’s NOT how it’s done Mark.
Mark Levin is too afraid to admit he got fooled by Cruz. That tells us A LOT about his character.
I wonder if Mark, like Beck, thinks Cruz is the second coming?
Kind of sad to see so many people turn on someone so quickly who they probably once agreed with and praised for his tireless efforts to push the conservative agenda.
I agree that Mark should acknowledge that Trump is now the nominee and we all need to get behind him and do everything he can to defeat HRC. I think he’s a bit slow coming around to this, but I think he will eventually.
The guy has spent a lifetime working for our side and I think he deserves better treatment than some here are currently giving him.
Mark Levin has been sounding the tocsin of alarm against the Republican establishment, against Rinos, against phony conservatives for years and he has illustrated his warnings with anecdotes extending as far back as his own participation in the Reagan administration. His conservative bona fides extend that far back and they are genuine because they are incidents of real action. The last one I remember is his recounting the story of finding Saul Alinsky's books being distributed by the Carter administration at our cost. He has recounted the battle between Reagan and Ford in 1976 to instruct us all on the true conservative approach to gaining the nomination.
Mark Levin has given the history of Rino domination of the party he has given their resistance to Ronald Reagan proper historical context so that we understand who the Bushes and John Boehner and Mitch McConnell are. He recounts betrayal by Orin Hatch on his program. It is hard to identify anyone in the pantheon of conservatives who are publicly known who would have been more strident in their attacks on Rino Republicans and who have lent their support to insurgents in the house and who has lent his airtime to insurgents seeking election in the House and Senate.
Mark Levin is not the problem, he is part of the solution, why in God's name do we shoot the messenger?
He has been loud and long in his criticism of the House leadership and loud and long in support of the insurgents including Dave Brat. Mark Levin stands out among broadcasters as one of the few who will risk his reputation by endorsing candidates, even in primaries, and even when the odds against his choice of winning are long. He does that not to advance his reputation but to advance conservatism. He has time and again recounted the opposition by the Rino Republicans to Ronald Reagan. No one has been more emphatic than Mark Levin in describing the breakdown of conservatism and the Republican Party over the years. It is not just his criticism but as activism and commitment through his career and through Landmark Legal over decades which lends him credibility.
More, he has written commercially successful, influential books espousing true conservatism and has even advanced a very influential argument on behalf of Article V thereby energizing an attempt to cure the problems seen in Washington. Whether you approve or disapprove of a convention of the states, it is undeniable that Mark Levin has seen the problem and has advanced a solution.
I know of no pundit who has been more right on all the issues. He is right on trade, right on immigration, right on convention of the states, right on deficits and budgets, right on the war against terror, right on Obamacare, right on environmental tyranny, right on the meaning of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. I know of no issue on which he is "wrong."
Nearly faultless on substance, his popularity speaks for his engaging broadcast personality as he remains in fifth place among radio talkers and his newly launched Levin TV appears to be hugely successful. I was pleased to receive a year subscription to his television program from my children for my birthday and I can say that the presentation is as professional as it is entertaining but most important it is factually driven, logical, and consistently conservative. The television program, the books, the radio show all our carefully grounded in an exposition of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, a review of relevant court decisions, real and often very personal history, or the actual wording of the law in question. He presents in-depth interviews of fascinating guests and actually lets them talk, a 180° departure from his one obvious failing on radio, his rudeness to callers. All in all, in four disciplines, television, radio, publishing (books and Conservative Review), and legal activism Mark Levin has demonstrated excellence, competence and popular success.
His career demonstrates that he walks the walk as well as talks the talk. Mark Levin is not part of the problem he is part of the solution.
I didn’t mind so much Levin stumping for Cruz early on, but then he went off the deep end. He started insulting Trump supporters. Not a wise move in any business to alienate a large percentage of your customers.