Head of Council on Foreign Relations: Cutting Immigration Could Cause US Muslims to Become ‘Threaten

Legal Insurrection ^ | July 15, 2016 | Mark Finkelstein

[Zakeet]

Complete Headline: Head of Council on Foreign Relations: Don’t Reduce Immigration - Could Cause US Muslims to Become 'Threatening'

Want to see a textbook example of the kind of thinking that leads to the fall of civilizations? View the video of Richard Haass, President of the Council Relations on today's Morning Joe. A clip was played of Donald Trump calling for a declaration of war against and repeating his call for the restriction of Muslim immigration, in particular Syrian "refugees" that we know little or nothing about. A hand-wringing Haass argues against "cutting down immigration" and other measures, because "our connections with entire populations and communities, our best measure of defense is making sure that people in these communities are working with us rather than threatening us."

Consider what Haass said: we shouldn't defend ourselves against terrorists entering the country by restricting the immigration of Muslim "refugees" about whom we know little or nothing. Why? Because doing so would incite Muslims already in the United States and lead to them “threatening us." If that is so, then our problems are even more serious than we have realized. If the Muslim population in the US is a tinderbox, on the brink of "threatening us" if we try to defend ourselves, why were they admitted in the first place? And whatever additional threat they might pose if we do adopt sensible measures, shouldn't the first thing we do be to limit the ability of more such volatile people from entering our country? Haass' attitude, which as you'll see is seconded by Mika Brzezinski, is the passive, self-disarming road to the decline and ultimately destruction of our nation and civilization.

[HangUpNow]

Well done. Your TO-DO list is EXACTLY what any patriot-leader of this Republic would handle the Muslim/Sharia threat to our culture, our nation, our freedom, our very survival. ZERO-TOLERANCE POLICY.

Haas is a pandering, back-stabbing traitor, plain and simple. CFR has gone too far and now exposed as the facilitator of shredding the USCON and planning a lawless, anarchist Mexican-Muslim invasion.

[Ohioan]

This is very revealing. The CFR was formed in the early 1920s by disgruntled Wilsonians, after America had rallied to reject the League of Nations. It was always intended to involve us increasingly in foreign entanglements.

This appears to indicate just how hostile the CFR is to keeping America true to her unique heritage.

Traditional America was always a friend to all who showed us respect; to all of whom, we showed respect back. "Respect" that does not allow us to control our borders; to control whom we allow to settle in our increasingly crowded homelands; is no respect at all.

I recognize that some Conservatives have accepted membership in the CFR, from time to time. But the bias of the organization has always remained clearly internationalist. The purpose has never been preserving the unique culture of American communities.

This is hardly a time to buy the CFR approach to the future.

[Mr. Mojo]

To what extent are they willing to subvert the USCON

To the fullest, and way beyond. They'll stop at nothing to reach their goal -- a borderless world ruled by one central, unelected authority. A totalitarian oligarchy.

is Pence a member of the CFR??

Unless he dropped his membership, the the answer appears to be no.

Whew.

[Honorary Serb]

The Council on Foreign Relations is one of our GREATEST enemies!!!!

We’re already threatened by the muslims within our country—and the fifth columnists who aid and abet them!!!! Adding more muslims—and bowing down to fifth columnists like the CFR and the human rights organizations—would only make matters MUCH WORSE!!!!

PHOOEY!!!!

[OrioleFan]

I am reminded of Animal House: “Thank you sir, may I have another.”