"The conservative movement was propelled by attacks on the Warren Court. In the '50s and '60s, "Impeach Earl Warren!" was plastered on billboards and bumper stickers all across God's country."
bump
Monica Crowley (love that gal) made an excellent point on Hannity. She pointed out how the left, for years, have shoved down everyone’s throat that blacks and hispanics cannot expect a fair trial when there’s a white jury.
Is this not calling all whites racist? How the left gets away with it and turns the same logic against the right, with the willing accomplices in the media, is unreal.
Here’s the news release the LaRaza legal group released a year ago
http://us4.campaign-archive2.com/?u=df9a27c10b6d6ba38ba001440&id=f8a4a02241&e=cd8fc1ccd9%0A
I’ve had my fill of the passive aggressive PC GOP.
They so want to sink the Trump train..ain’t gonna happen..
Pat Buchanan is an excellent historian, with a special gift for articulating positions efficiently and clearly. This is a case where Trump would've fared better if he mentioned the LaRaza connection instead of the issue being Mexican descent.
Pat Buchanan would've been concise about that.
Judges are biased it is just a question to what degree.
Judges are biased to lawyers who are personal friends who happen to appear in “their” courtroom.
Judges are biased to their political opinions. (remember the California judge who was actually recalled because she PERSONALLY opposed the death penalty)
Judges have private judicial conferences where all these biases are discussed and they are taught how to avoid appearing biased.
How about the California activist judge who conveniently legalized homosexual based marriage in order to “marry” his “boyfriend”?
Judges have the power to recuse themselves without any notice. This judge should just recuse himself for all the reasons screaming bias. In fact this just should outright resign.
Anyone who does not believe that these Federal judges who are politically screened , vetted and selected by the partisan politicians do not show bias in their behavior and rulings have never dealt with a Federal judge. Just observe how reliable and in bloc the Justices appointed by Obama have voted and behaved on the Supreme Court. Trump’s sister is a Federal judge. He has a better insight than most.
All of this dust up just tells me how experience with partisan (openly racist) judges will positively impact the quality of his Supreme Court nominations.
La Raza is an hispanic supremecy group. Nothing more. Should be stated as such.
appointed the Robbins Geller law firm to represent plaintiffs. Robbins Geller has paid $675,000 in speaking fees since 2009 to Trump’s likely opponent, Hillary Clinton, and to her husband, former president Bill Clinton. Curiel appointed the firm in the case before Trump entered the presidential race, but again, it might not be unreasonable for a defendant in Trump’s position to wonder who Curiel favors in the presidential election.
See link:
The attorney group leading the lawsuit against Trump are heavily involved in Democrat politics and have paid Bill and Hillary Clinton $675,000 for “speeches”. (link)
The Judge in the lawsuit is an open borders immigration activist with direct ties to San Diego La Raza, and has openly engaged with them on their political endeavors. (link) and (link) including scholarships for illegal aliens.
The Trump lawsuit relies (in part) on testimony from a former disgruntled employee of the Trump Organization who went to work for notorious #NeverTrump activist Glenn Beck. (link)
The Judge then “accidentally” releases court records which provides the media with the names, locations, and contact information of the plaintiffs and witnesses in the case, which fuels the media narrative. (link)
After the “mistaken” release, Judge Curiel reseals the court records. (link)
The Judge is a member of an ethnic legal group, HNBA, whose specific and publicly expressed intentions are to target Donald Trump’s business interests (link)
Actually, if Trump had said the judge was an American, he would have been wrong.
He said the judge was “Mexican”. It’s true because that’s where his sympathies lie. That’s his allegiance.
And that’s what Trump said. That judge is a MEXICAN.
And he is.
bump
When Pat is good, he’s really, really good.
And once again, following the Bush clan's lead, the GOP establishment sides with La Raza against Americans. Even supposed Trump ally Gingrich chimed in on behalf of La Raza.
They link on their by laws page to LARAZA.
That is an explicit statement of solidarity with an anti-American organization, who has stated their goals are The Reqoncuista, a return of so called Mexican lands to ghe Mexican people, which where, in their words “Stolen by the White Man”(sic)
It is a fantasy that there was ever a collective Mexican people, as there wasn’t during or before the synthetic claim of stolen lands.
It should be noted that there are various languages of indiginous peoples over the centuries such as:
“Nahuatl, Yucatec, Tzotzil, Mixtec, Zapotec, Otomi, Huichol, Totonac and other living 54 languages along the Mexican territory, as well as Spanish.”
That is more than 65 claimed or known languages of disparate peoples who were organized as clans, bands and tribes, each competitors to each other before the modern era.
There was no collective Mexican people nor a homogenous Mexican nation until the 20th century and even today, each tribe has their own imperatives arguing against the central government headquartered in Mexico City.
The most notorious examples are the tribes seeking autonomy for self determination seperate from the Federal goverment, who acts, by force, against the tribes, for various business interests and subjugates the native peoples by force, stealing their lands, imprisoning anyone opposed to the Federal Jack Boot thugs who act as a proxy force on behalf of businesses, with no regard for culture and families of local tribes.
Beside all that, Mexico has a policy of exporting their people, who only wish to practice their local customs, way of life and preservation of culture, so big business legal and criminal can co-opt the lands.
Mexico is a great nation(/S) that many wish to leave, so they may and can pursue what is the the American Dream:
Life, liberty and the pursuit of happyness, so their families might improve their lot in life and give meaning to heritage of passing on “The Good Struggle” for their progeny.
Mexicans come to America because they know they have a chance to become anything or anyone, with equal opportunity not found nor possible in their homeland.
It is sad people are forced to leave their families, neighborhoods, lands, the smells of memories and the country they wish they could be proud of.
Mexico should be ashamed they are incapable of creating laws and a culture where each individual is equal any other citizen.
Pathetic is a kind word to describe the culture and policies that force migration because parity of opportunity to pursue ones dreams is non-existent.
If Mexicans have a certain “Heritage” then what conclusions are we to draw of the Canadian Heritage.
They also border the United States and yet, there is no mass yearning to leave their families and country.
Why? The laws and culture enable all who wish for any station in life to do so, as a matter of desire and will, with no fear some greedy persons or corporation will engage the government to steal ideas, lands for their nefarious and unfair business interest.
Lastly, there can be no Reqonquista.
Looking at the flag of California gives us a hint as to why:
California, like Texas was a Lone Star State. It is alluded to by the star on the flag and then there is the Bear on the Flag, which is symbolic of The Bear Flag Revolt, when Californians left the barely independent country of Mexico, who had also revolted against Spain some 20 plus years earlier but, had no ability to govern the territory of California nor provide any benefit economically, as their government was still in its formative yearsx with an economic system that such a basket case they could not afford to pay for the administration of then government services.
In fact, they were a lousy debtor nation which time and again reneged and failed to pay its obligations to nations such as France, who invaded in 1862 to demand payment and force Mexico to live up to its promise to pay for loans amd goods.
Today, Cinco de Mayo is well celebrated in the US but, is a minor blip in Mexico itself, probably because it is and should be embarassing to celebrate an invasion caused by irresponsible policy.
So, forward to the Modern era and some idiots who insist and demand California be returned to Mexico.
It is not possible for a so called “Reqonquista”.
Mexico cannot currently manage to induce their own people to stay but rather, it compells them to leave; No one in their right mind and divorced from idiot fantasy would would want to perform an act which be suicidal.
If Trump would have just fought the judge on the judge’s beliegs and associations, he would have been fine.
The problem came when Trump said the guy could not judge him because he was Mexican. When you say someone can’t do a particular job because of his race, then you are a racist - just as racist as the groups that say that whites can’t judge blacks.
So Donald - get out there and explain yourself.