Posted on 06/02/2016 7:58:51 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Starting on June 7th, FEMA will be conducting a large scale drill that has been named “Cascadia Rising” that will simulate the effects of a magnitude 9.0 earthquake along the Cascadia Subduction Zone and an accompanying west coast tsunami dozens of feet tall. According to the official flyer for the event, more than “50 counties, plus major cities, tribal nations, state and federal agencies, private sector businesses, and non-governmental organizations across three states – Washington, Oregon, and Idaho – will be participating”. In addition to “Cascadia Rising”, U.S. Northern Command will be holding five other exercises simultaneously. According to the final draft of the Cascadia Rising drill plan, those five exercises are entitled “Ardent Sentry 2016″, “Vigilant Guard”, “Special Focus Exercise”, “Turbo Challenge” and “Joint Logistics Over-The-Shore”. The primary scenario that of all of these participants will be focusing on will be one that involves a magnitude 9.0 earthquake along the Cascadia Subduction Zone followed by a giant tsunami that could displace up to a million people from northern California to southern Canada.
We have never seen such a disaster before in all of U.S. history.
Do they know something that the rest of us do not?
It is funny that they are preparing to deal with the effects of a magnitude 9.0 earthquake along the Cascadia Subduction Zone, because that is precisely the size of earthquake that I warned about in an article back in March.
The San Andreas Fault in southern California gets more headlines, but the Cascadia Subduction Zone is a much larger threat by far. This fault zone is where the Juan de Fuca plate meets the North American plate, and it stretches approximately 700 miles from northern Vancouver Island all the way down to northern California.
If a magnitude 9.0 earthquake were to strike, the immense shaking and subsequent tsunami would cause damage on a scale that is hard to even imagine right now. Perhaps this is why FEMA feels such a need to get prepared for this type of disaster, because the experts assure us that it is most definitely coming someday. The following comes from the official website of the “Cascadia Rising” exercise…
A 9.0 magnitude earthquake along the Cascadia Subduction Zone (CSZ) and the resulting tsunami is the most complex disaster scenario that emergency management and public safety officials in the Pacific Northwest could face. Cascadia Rising is an exercise to address that disaster.
June 7-10, 2016 Emergency Operations and Coordination Centers (EOC/ECCs) at all levels of government and the private sector will activate to conduct a simulated field response operation within their jurisdictions and with neighboring communities, state EOCs, FEMA, and major military commands.
If you don’t think that the scenario that they are studying is realistic, perhaps you should consider the fact that the largest earthquake in the history of the continental United States stuck along the Cascadia Subduction Zone back in 1700. The following comes from CNN…
In fact, “the Cascadia” already has made history, causing the largest earthquake in the continental United States on January 26, 1700. That’s when the Cascadia unleashed one of the world’s biggest quakes, causing a tsunami so big that it rampaged across the Pacific and damaged coastal villages in Japan.
Yes, we all remember the big Hollywood blockbuster about the San Andreas fault. But if they wanted to be more realistic, they should have made the movie about the Cascadia Subduction Zone. According to a professor of geophysics at Oregon State University, the Cascadia Subduction Zone has the potential to create an earthquake “almost 30 times more energetic” than anything the San Andreas Fault can produce…
Everyone knows the Cascadia’s cousin in California: the San Andreas Fault. It gets all the scary glamor, with even a movie this year, “San Andreas,” dramatizing an apocalypse in the western U.S.
Truth is, the San Andreas is a lightweight compared with the Cascadia.
The Cascadia can deliver a quake that’s many times stronger — plus a tsunami.
“Cascadia can make an earthquake almost 30 times more energetic than the San Andreas to start with, and then it generates a tsunami at the same time, which the side-by-side motion of the San Andreas can’t do,” said Chris Goldfinger, a professor of geophysics at Oregon State University.
And the kind of tsunami that would be created by such a massive quake along the Cascadia Subduction Zone would absolutely dwarf the massive tsunami that struck Japan back in 2011. In fact, an article in the New Yorker quoted the head of the FEMA division that oversees Oregon, Washington, Idaho and Alaska as saying that “everything west of Interstate 5 will be toast”…
If the entire zone gives way at once, an event that seismologists call a full-margin rupture, the magnitude will be somewhere between 8.7 and 9.2. That’s the very big one.
…By the time the shaking has ceased and the tsunami has receded, the region will be unrecognizable. Kenneth Murphy, who directs FEMA’s Region X, the division responsible for Oregon, Washington, Idaho, and Alaska, says, “Our operating assumption is that everything west of Interstate 5 will be toast.”
In the Pacific Northwest, everything west of Interstate 5 covers some hundred and forty thousand square miles, including Seattle, Tacoma, Portland, Eugene, Salem (the capital city of Oregon), Olympia (the capital of Washington), and some seven million people.
We live at a time when the crust of our planet is becoming increasingly unstable. Based on my research, I have come to the conclusion that we will soon see major earth changes on a scale that most of us would never even dare to imagine.
All over the world the Ring of Fire is roaring to life, and the Cascadia Subduction Zone lies directly along the Ring of Fire. Just last week, I wrote about the alarming earthquake swarms that we have seen directly under Mt. Rainier, Mt. Hood and Mt. St. Helens, and now we have learned that FEMA is about to hold a major drill that is going to simulate a magnitude 9.0 earthquake along the Cascadia Subduction Zone and an accompanying west coast tsunami dozens of feet in height.
Of course most Americans aren’t concerned about this threat at all.
Most Americans just assume that life will continue to go on normally just as it always has.
But I happen to agree with the experts that are promising us that an absolutely massive earthquake along the Cascadia Subduction Zone will strike someday, and when that happens life in America will be permanently altered.
I wasn’t praising FEMA at all. I was simply stating the obvious that the writer seems to have missed. This is just contingency planning for an event that might happen. It has nothing to do with secret information that they have about an impending earthquake.
Cleveland will be affected by the New Madrid fault. Probably not much to the buildings or your house. But with all of the midwest infrastructure in ruins (gas lines, bridges, transporation, etc.) you might want to have some extra candles and water handy. (In the 1800’s in knocked down chimneys in NYC!)
I’m good for about 4 to 6 weeks on my own. For a large scale event like these (and probably will never happen), it won’t be the “3 days” they used to talk about.
“Like FEMA performed during the practiced evacuation of New Orleans (3 times) before Katrina, or the noreaster that took out so much of New Jersey shore (6 times) or...”
You are under a common misperception that FEMA is responsible for evacuations etc. during and immediately after a disaster. Those are state and local responsibilities. FEMA never has had responsibility over those functions. What FEMA does is help down range government prepare plans and policies for disasters but FEMA are not the ones who are supposed to carry them out. FEMA’s primary role is “continuity of government in times of natural or manmade disasters”. This involves making sure that government can function and that local, state and Federal resources coordinate, communicate and cooperate according to planning. FEMA’s role is not to get individuals to safety. If an planned for evacuation is a clusterf*** blame the state and local officials who were supposed to carry out the plan. FEMA does not have the authority to order local officials to do their jobs the way they were supposed to do them.
“Let’s be honest, FEMA’s ‘drills’ are nothing more than extravagant vacations.”
That is your opinion but as someone who previously worked for that Agency, I saw firsthand how these “drills” exposed shortcomings in disaster planning, communication & logistics networks etc. that could be remedied before they were needed in an actual emergency. Honestly there are very few actual FEMA personnel involved in these drills anyway (the participants usually are mostly state and local emergency officials).
Bflv
If you're in Cleveland, a tsunami could only help! /rim-shot>
Do they have Bug Out bags? Bicycles in working condition?
That is just the very start. Please guide them in these decisions, so that they may live.
Ham radio operators do not prepare and practice for putting people in camps and herding them against their will.
FEMA does.
It is theorized that, after the big Loma Prieta quake, much of the strain on techtonic plates in the SF Bay Area is focused on the Hayward Fault, which runs under Oakland.
Ping
What’s special about Eugene/Springfield Oregon? Is that area built on a solid slab of strong rock? Several damage maps show an island of low impact relative to the surrounding area.
An area within the Columbia River outlet east of Astoria appears to focus the tsunami energy, as depicted by the color-scale of damage (maxed out).
https://www.oregon.gov/OMD/OEM/osspac/docs/01_ORP_Cascadia.pdf
Also near the coast, count in 10-15 feet of lower elevation (5 minute time frame), when contemplating flooding issues.
Hayward fault could be a problem for the S.F. Bay area.
California goes Republican in 20 minutes?
Japanese record keeping noted a tsunami without a preceding earthquake—a bolt out of the blue kind of wake-up.
“8.0 to 9.2 is 16x, not 80x.”
It is 70-80x more energy release. Regardless of 16x vs 80x, which we can debate all day long, a 9.2 subduction quake in the water is far more deadlier than that the 8.0 strike-slip quake on land. There is no debating that.
Up until a decade or so ago, the region was considered very safe in terms of earthquake, based on the historical lack of any incidence (since the European settlement). Unknown until then that a fault was capable of storing all the accumulated stress of many century as uplift strain, without any release between major quakes.
California’s experience with structural damage at that time wasn’t considered applicable to points north. Now, only Japan’s engineering experience with severe events comes close to the expertise appropriate to building codes in the northwest.
“I’ve lived in California 43 years and every year they tell us “there’s a 90% probability of a 7.0 or larger quake in the next 30 years.”
Sounds like there’s a 90% probability that you are 13 years overdue a 7.0 or larger quake.
From afar perhaps; as, Seattle won’t be standing there after the first 5 minutes.
How many dams will survive???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.