Posted on 03/27/2016 6:41:38 AM PDT by wrrock
Cruz about to do something very sweet. I may cry.
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
Yeah, you can’t trust anything on the internet. Just because it is always ahead of the curve. We can all wait for confirmation that is not from a racist, sexist, homophobe before we make us some weak explanation.
“It’s called sarcasm.”
Why would there be sarcasm?
“There’s warmth and there’s space, there’s intimacy and there’s distance...”
If anything I see empathy..
Really going for it today RT @Salon: Why I date married men: “There’s warmth and there’s space, there’s intimacy and there’s distance...”Twitter is not always easy to figure out at times. But that quote is from a Salon article, that Amanda has issued a tweet on. The portion "Why I date married men" is the TITLE of the Salon article. The sarcasm part comes at the very beginning, Amanda's true words: "Really going for it today RT @Salon" ~ She's being a smart alec.
LOL. Please, Jeb and Lindsey are big pals with Ted now, they got what they wanted as payment and it's not cash. Cash they can pick up almost anywhere.
The question isn't "where" are the payments, the question is "what" cooperation Ted has promised as payment.
“But that quote is from a Salon article,”
Yup .. I had read the article already. I still see what I see, especially with all her other tweets and pics.
I was just reading an interesting article:
Experts: Ted Cruz Appears Deceptive in His Response to Sex Scandal
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3414444/posts?page=1#1
What I see,in my mind, are more pieces to a puzzle that point to the same conclusion.
I’m still stuck on the money transferred between the Cruz and Fiorina PACS, as well as the attack ad Liz Mair put out for Ted Cruz. I keep hearing that they (Jeff Roe and Mair) would be crazy to communicate because it would be illegal. Personally I considered that line to be naive; then I read this:
“It’s bold, but legal: How campaigns and their super PAC backers work together”
The money quote:
“We could capture all of this stuff if we had real rules,” said Fred Wertheimer, a longtime advocate of reducing the influence of big money on politics. “For all practical purposes, there are no prohibitions against coordination.”
The lawsuit was filed by Jill Harth who then went by Jill Harth Houraney on April 25, 1997. Harth, who was in her early 30’s at the time, alleged that Trump engaged in hostile and offensive sexual behavior towards her from 1992 to 1997 including “groping” her under her dress on several occasions, “forcibly” moving her to his daughter’s bedroom in an attempt to have sex with her, and repeatedly, aggressively and inappropriately propositioning her for sex. She called it “sexually abusive” and LawNewz.com spoke to her in an exclusive interview.http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/exclusive-inside-the-donald-trump-sexual-assault-lawsuit/
Crickets..............
While it does look like the coat fits her, it is weird that it’s at the same time as his tv appearance without a jacket. I don’t know, but it looks bad.
So all those times the Trumpettes swore up and down that the fact that Trump retweeted sexist and offensive tweets didn’t mean he agreed with them, they were lying to us?
It looks bad to people “looking” for a story. I’m going to wait this out and see what comes first or second, as my mother used to say. :)
You’re kidding me, right ???
I first thought one has nothing to do with the other, then I read the article:
At the time, Trump vigorously denied the charges saying the suit “was a desperate attempt to get me to settle a case they can’t win.” But then, not even a month after filing the case, Harth withdrew it. The court record indicates it was “voluntarily dismissed” but “without prejudice,” meaning she could have re-filed the case. The timing is interesting because at around the same time the case was withdrawn, Trump reportedly agreed to settle with her husband’s company, The American Dream Enterprise, according to an obscure 1997 gossip article in the New York Daily News which appears to be the only mainstream media coverage of either suit.
Think she was putting pressure on him ???
So were the sexual harassment allegations true? Harth says: “The allegations were twisted and embellished. Everything could be looked at in different way.”
Harth, who now runs a beauty business, says she’s put the lawsuit behind her, and get this, she says she’d even vote for Donald Trump in the upcoming election — what she calls “supporting a friend.”
“I saw him [Donald] recently, and he said I looked good,” Harth said. “I have nothing but good things to say about Donald.”
I guess so !!!
Did you even read the article ???
This post by Bray is extremely important and should be posted where it is more easily distributed to others.
Thanks Bray. If you post as thread please ping
She withdrew the suit less than a month after filing it. But now, according to a report in the Guardian following up on our coverage, Harth is apparently standing by her initial complaint. When asked by the Guardian whether she stood by the accusations detailed in the 12-page lawsuit, Harth reportedly texted the reporter back, “Yes.”There's more here:
Vanities of vanity..
“When asked by the Guardian whether she stood by the accusations detailed in the 12-page lawsuit, Harth reportedly texted the reporter back, “Yes.”
“So were the sexual harassment allegations true? Harth says: “The allegations were twisted and embellished. Everything could be looked at in different way.”
In a report that year in the New York Daily News, Trump was quoted as saying that her lawsuit “was a desperate attempt to get me to settle” the separate contractual dispute. A later report said a settlement was reached in July and that she and her husband attended a party at Trump’s Florida estate to celebrate his separation from his wife Marla Maples.
So to one reporter she texted the word “YES”
” I would have cooperated with a real interview if you had waited until Monday like I asked.
It is worth noting that we did wait until Tuesday February 23 to publish the article — five days after we spoke to Ms. Harth. Following our 10 minute interview with her, we called/texted her multiple times to follow up about the interview and ask her additional questions. She never responded until after the story was posted.”
Since then:
She was invited and attended a Trump party
She admitted that she twisted and embellished her story
She still considers Trump a friend
And she intends to vote for him
What am I missing ??
I think what does it for me, is this Amanda Carpenter acts like a left wing operative when she “makes her list.” The hate for Trump and anyone who supports him, is visceral.
Then you have these tweets...and I mean c’mon, Man.
Where is this baby of AManda Carpenter? I see no photos of her. Is she for real?
Her Tweet account has her actively tweeting garbage about Trump like some school girl. I thought she was a journalist.
I didn’t save the photo as I thought the child needs protected. She vaguely resembles him. Hit her as the creator of the list but leave the kid out of it IMO is
Amanda’s husband’s sister confirmed the relationship here ( AC comment talk to my lawyers appears more relevant. She has been preparing for this brouhaha )
https://medium.com/@Blackppl4Trump/l-affaire-of-ted-cruz-c1818b9db18f#.qz33s5sux
Also a tweet time line that is incriminating but I don’t follow Twitter
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.