Little Sisters' Religious Liberty Goes On Trial

American Thinker ^ | March 25, 2016 | Daniel John Sobieski

[raptor22]

This is the kind of case the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia liked to sink his judicial teeth into -- whether the federal government can compel a religious entity like the Little Sisters of the Poor to violate their religious beliefs and acquiesce to the ObamaCare contraceptive coverage mandate. As LifeSite News reported on Wednesday’s hearing:

This week, the U.S. Supreme Court heard the case of the Little Sisters of the Poor, a 175-year-old religious order of women who have vowed their lives to care for the elderly poor.

[raptor22]

RELIGIOUS LIBERTY PING

[stinkerpot65]

Only the beginning. Totalitarian leftist thugs are on the march.

[Buttons12]

How did it come to this? Why is the federal govt demanding that anyone obtain or provide insurance?

[raptor22]

RELIGIOUS LIBERTY PING

[Buckeye McFrog]

Sadly, due to Justice Scalia’s passing, it is a case they are destined to lose.

[raptor22]

RELIGIOUS LIBERTY PING

[Jack Hammer]

The First Amendment is dead.

[SunkenCiv]

Thanks raptor22.

[Rurudyne]

Because the Constitution as amended means nothing to so-called “Progressives”. They are satisfied with Arbitrary government.