Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump's Dirty War Losing Steam: CRUZ Leads Fresh WI Poll -and Now Within 3 Points Nationally
Reaganite Republican ^ | 24 March 2016 | Reaganite Republican

Posted on 03/24/2016 3:21:28 AM PDT by Reaganite Republican

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-157 next last
To: 9YearLurker
I sense a trend.

From RealClearPolitics:

Polling Data

Poll Date Sample
Trump
Cruz
Kasich
Spread
RCP Average 3/16 - 3/22 -- 43.0 30.3 19.1 Trump +12.7
FOX NewsFOX News 3/20 - 3/22 388 LV 41 38 17 Trump +3
BloombergBloomberg 3/19 - 3/22 366 LV 40 31 25 Trump +9
QuinnipiacQuinnipiac 3/16 - 3/21 652 RV 43 29 16 Trump +14
MonmouthMonmouth 3/17 - 3/20 353 RV 41 29 18 Trump +12
CBS News/NY TimesCBS/NYT 3/17 - 3/20 362 LV 46 26 20 Trump +20
CNN/ORCCNN/ORC 3/17 - 3/20 397 RV 47 31 17 Trump +16
Rasmussen ReportsRasmussen 3/16 - 3/17 719 LV 43 28 21 Trump +15


81 posted on 03/24/2016 5:07:06 AM PDT by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kudsman

You’re giving up Rush just because he won’t endorse Trump?


82 posted on 03/24/2016 5:07:18 AM PDT by jstaff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Cruz has disavowed this ad. Do your homework.


83 posted on 03/24/2016 5:09:09 AM PDT by jstaff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: LS

You’re welcome. I’ll be honest. Having read your posts for a while now, I have to say you analyse polls and data far better than I ever will. I’ll just have to hope you can get to the bottom of that excellent question. It would be fascinating to see it unpacked.


84 posted on 03/24/2016 5:13:19 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: jstaff

“Cruz has disavowed this ad.”

Intersting. I was on the forum all day yesterday, and never saw a single mention of it.

Did his disavowal make the news, or did he tell you that personally?


85 posted on 03/24/2016 5:14:05 AM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

The Heidib**ch is a Goldman Sachs top executive shill and her husband the Canadian presidential wannabe senator is a cuckold to his wife’s employer. She has already instructed him as to what he needs to shut up about, and do, to win the nomination and so she can keep that astronomical salary she’s getting from GS. Great presidential material isn’t he? The GS Wall Street globalists have given the starred couple their orders. What the hell is all this coronation and beatification of Heidi about, she is neither a queen nor a saint, yet to listen to the media and some of you she is the second coming. And Trump did not “threaten” her, in any way shape or form. Yes that played in the street perfectly—like he bodily threatened her or something —didn’t it? That was the lying twisted media’s intent when they came out with that one-liner—”Trump threatens Cruz’s wife!!!!!”. It was supermarket tabloid journalism worthy of the National Enquirer. What he said was he would simply “spill the beans”. That is NOT a bodily threat, it is the truth about her nefarious Wall Street nexus. There are a lot of beans to be spilled. And Trump is not stupid. He KNOWS what’s up with her and her Goldman Sachs connection. Why hasn’t she resigned or at least taken a sabbatical? They’ve done absolutely nothing about the status quo. If Cruz is so above board why hasn’t she tried to avoid even the appearance of impropriety? Her husband is running for president for chrissakes! Idiots all of you!


86 posted on 03/24/2016 5:14:54 AM PDT by 4Runner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

If I recall, wasn’t there the reply, “when’s the national primary,” when pro-Trump posters touted national polls earlier in the cycle that showed Trump doing well?

You are right in that since the majority of states have made their preference known, a national poll for the primary season is less valuable. Upcoming state polls are what to focus on.

Now if the methodology of this poll is sound, then it is better news for Cruz, but we’ll find out the actual results soon enough.


87 posted on 03/24/2016 5:15:18 AM PDT by HombreSecreto (The life of a repo man is always intense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

And that’s not including the Reuters poll.


88 posted on 03/24/2016 5:16:10 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: jstaff
You’re giving up Rush just because he won’t endorse Trump?

Everyone who doesn't endorse Trump goes under the bus, regardless of their conservative credentials.

89 posted on 03/24/2016 5:18:48 AM PDT by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1
Don’t tell me we could still end up with the preachy condescending lawyer?

If Cruz gets the nomination, I'm staying home. It'll be the very first election at any level (municipal, county, state, federal) since I've been able to vote that I'll do so.

I'm that disgusted by the Cruz campaign's back-room collaboration releasing nude pictures of Melania Trump.

There's zero doubt in my mind Cruz and/or his campaign was in on it. He's a slimy, fake, fraud POS.

What was that Cruz said the other day? "Accountability begins at the top of the campaign?" Holding you accountable, Ted!!!!

90 posted on 03/24/2016 5:22:25 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: al_c

“would you vote for Cruz in November?”

I will not be party to the further destruction of our safeguard to the highest office in the nation, the natural born clause. Obama is not a natural born citizen and neither is Cruz. Two in a row would be the final nail in the natural born clause coffin and frankly I am surprised how many here are willing to drive that nail.


91 posted on 03/24/2016 5:28:09 AM PDT by walkingdead (It's easy, you just don't lead 'em as much....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Ok, I know how this works. I post a link that shows a Cruz interview where he totally disavows the Melania ad. You ignore the ad and call me a Cruzer loser. You continue in your willful ignorance.

But, just in case, here is the link:

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc-quick-cuts/watch/cruz-no-involvement-in-melania-ad-650827331824


92 posted on 03/24/2016 5:32:55 AM PDT by jstaff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Kudsman

Haven’t seen any of those in favor of the other guy now have we? Good grief.


93 posted on 03/24/2016 5:33:40 AM PDT by John W (Under One Year And Counting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

Why is not posting your own blog a vanity post?


94 posted on 03/24/2016 5:36:23 AM PDT by nclaurel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

He has serious issues. A petty little man with tiny hands who must be doing drugs when he tweets this drivel. How embarrassing and sickening.
Thanks for your reasoned post.


95 posted on 03/24/2016 5:37:52 AM PDT by libbylu (Cruz: The truth with a smile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

“Melania speaks 5 languages”

She knows how to say I will pose nude for money in 5 languages.


96 posted on 03/24/2016 5:38:20 AM PDT by texhenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

First off you are serial blog pimp. Never in in billion years will I go to your dopey blog. Why must you fling your poop everywhere? The gloves are off. I have never critized Cruz supporters. For you I will make an exception. I have been here 16 years. You putz. You think this Canadian is the second coming. Deal w it. Rafael Eduardo Cruz will never be president.


97 posted on 03/24/2016 5:39:40 AM PDT by Brasky (You miss every shot you never take.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: walkingdead
I will not be party to the further destruction of our safeguard to the highest office in the nation

Well said!

98 posted on 03/24/2016 5:41:43 AM PDT by MamaTexan (I am a person as created by the Law of Nature, not a person as created by the laws of Man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: al_c

Yes. Most of us were Trump/Cruz advocates until he pulled those sleazy stunts in Iowa, hired Beck, Bush, Romney.


99 posted on 03/24/2016 5:46:15 AM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

For one thing, you are a liar, like Lyin’ Ted.

Trump never attacked Cruz’s wife.
But a PAC supporting Cruz did attack Trumps wife.


100 posted on 03/24/2016 5:47:10 AM PDT by tennmountainman ("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small pittance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-157 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson