Posted on 01/26/2016 9:04:30 AM PST by Oldpuppymax
I am a conservative and have been all my life. I don’t need the snot-nosed, elitist pukes at National Review to “help me†out of my error. I support Donald Trump. People like the bunch at National Review have given us sure losers from Tom Dewey to Gerald Ford to the Bushes, Bob Dole, John McCain and Mitt Romney. They have done incalculable damage to America with their pointy headed elitism; now all that stops in November with the election of Donald Trump.
That I am beside myself with anger at the nerve of this bunch doesn’t begin to explain my feelings toward these people who have lied to me, mocked me and ignored me for years; that all stops in November with the election of Donald Trump.
Telling me I’m not smart enough to understand the nuances of politics and should therefore leave my future and the future of my family up to the next squishy, warmed over failure they think should run America is an insult.
I want a president who will be as feared as Richard Nixon; not a squishy momma’s boy, like Jeb Bush. I want a man in the White House who will speak plainly, not a fake like John McCain with his embarrassing “Plain Talk Express.â€
I want a president who can...
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
I just hope ruthie can hang in there another year
Yeah freedom.
Are you aware of the Reece Commission in 1953/4 on Large Tax Exempt FoundatiAlger Hiss was President of the Carnegie Foundation until he was arrested.
The House of Representatives in 1953 held the Reece Commission on Tax-Exempt Foundations.
Tax-Exempt Carnegie Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Guggenheim Fellowship, etc were found to have been trying (and are succeeding) since 1909 to make America into a collectivist society that can one day be merged with Russia (the exact words of Carnegie Foundation President Johnson in 1953 (whom succeeded Alger Hiss)). The words "can be merged with Russia" were the orders given to the President of the Carnegie Foundation, but really, I think what they meant was one-world government, with Russia just being the other superpower at the time.
The lead investigator was Norman Dodd and the above was related to him upon meeting with the trustees of the Carnegie Foundation. He received permission to have an investigator (Karthryn Casey) to look through the trustee minutes for two weeks. What she found was that in the first meeting (1909) the trustees asked, "What is the best way to alter the life of people in a society?" The answer that came back was through war. They then tried to get us into a war and finally succeeded with WW1. Once in it, they sent a message to the President saying that they didn't want the war to end too quickly.
In 1914 they decided to take over the way education was taught and assigned the Rockefeller Foundation with domestic history and retained control of international history. The Carnegie Foundation gathered a group of PhD candidates in history at Oxford and with help from the Gugenheim Fellowship changed the history was taught.
As with most investigations, the minority side (in this case the Republicans) threw a fit and the committee disbanded with most members too shocked to really do anything. Another member tried to restart it the following year or two, but he mysteriously died.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUYCBfmIcHM ons?
Prepare to be disappointed if Trump is elected. If elected he will be 70 years old when inaugurated, and you can;t teach an old dog new tricks. Reagan was old but he has been a conservative for more than 20 years when he was inaugurated. We have to take Trump totally on faith, because there is no evidence. Rather the only evidence tells us that he will mesh quite nicely with the Establishment that is now calling him names.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CZldiEaUMAA_MBg.jpg
National Review needs your help with their cruises, donate QUICKLY.
Oh you won't need to, Hillary's people will dispatch him in very short order.
Didn’t W give us the deciding vote on obummercare?
I want a president who truly loves this country and her heritage, who will be feared as much as our spineless corrupt lying congress critters, Republicans and Democrats alike, fear Obama! (Congress did not fear Richard Nixon nearly enough, they forced him to resign.)
I don’t think that’s necessarily so. I think the myth of Hillary is now bigger than her debilitated reality. The candidate that is willing to go for her throat will best her because the “emperor has no clothes” actuality couldn’t withstand it. She depends on the myth; the myth that so many of her ilk support her.
In actuality, it really is just myth and image. She is old, unfortunate looking and SERIOUSLY debilitated and she couldn’t competently respond to an all-out onslaught in a one-on-one debate where she couldn’t control venue, moderators and questions; the right opponent will not let that happen.
It remains to be seen whether we end up with either Trump or Cruz and if either is willing to go ruthlessly for her throat. In my world, good luck to whoever gets there on that stage across from her.
That’s where I am, too. I’m tuning out the cross-bashing between Trump and Cruz on this forum, which will mean skipping 80% of the articles. The amount of time it saves will be huge.
National Review is nothing more than a bunch of RINO pukes !! If you vote for a so called Conservative, Liberal, Democrat or Republican you get the same pile of horse shit liars every time. I don’t care how they label Trump I’m voting for him if for no other reason than he is not afraid of the bastards inside the beltway and the MSM..
Ain’t that the truth! I’d like to see even 10% of this needless bickering reserved for righteous condemnation against Hillary.
Well, I see that the liberals and RINOs usual tactics are still working. The Trump Supporters and the Cruz Supporters are at each others throats, throwing epithets at each other that are certain to leave festering wounds long past the primaries and insure that one set of “principled conservatives” will sit on their hands come the general election to “send a strong message”.
All the while, the real enemy, the.DC Uni-Party will continue to drive our country down the tubes.
We just don’t learn, do we folks!
Agreed on Hillary.
It’s late but there’s still time for them to roll out Biden. Throw Fauxcahontas in the mix and their side would get highly motivated.
That’s pretty much the way I see this. I firmly believe NR is not interested in Cruz, and once they achieve getting Trump out (if they do)they’ll line up against Cruz and go all in for Rubio - or some other GOPe flunky. Sad
You know what, Mr. RobbyS, and the rest of you Cruz-Nuts, DEFINE YOUR CONSERVATIVISM!!!!
I want to know exactly what you mean by “conservatism.” I have seen so many horrid positions posed by so-called conservatives (returning women to a medeival position where we are just chattel for example) I want to know what your underlying philosophy really is.
Donald Trump is, as far as I can tell, essentially a classical liberal and always has been; classic liberalism is a belief system based on natural law. I want to know what the heck it is you people actually believe anyway.
Whatever it is, it seems to me that it will just as surely destroy our country as those feudal leftists will because you will not be reasoned with, you will not forsake your blind belief that a tiny handheld fire extinguisher is all that needed when your entire house is in flames.
Nonsense. He's a conventional liberal crossed with a crony capitalist.
Just cause he ran for president on a lark and is mouthing tough guy platitudes, you think he's genuine.
Thanks for that!
I am not a Cruz-nut, as you say. My personal favorite in terms of character is Ben Carson. Others I could say nice things about. Not even sure that Cruz is the right one, and certainly history shows that not many president have been “the right ones†Maybe a half-dozen to a dozen. As for women, marriage ought not to make a woman chattel. But we ought not to idealize it either. St. Teresa of Avila became a nun because she was too smart to submit to the dullness of the marriages of that time. But the single life is not a bowl of cherries either in a nunnery or out. On the conservative side, I think that abortion on demand is barbarous and degrading. The word “choice†is bastardize when more often than not the choice is by the boyfriend/ loveer or parent, not the mother. Motherhood need not to be sentimentalized to acknowledge how it shapes what it means to be female. In th past it was terribly dangerous. It is ironic that in an age where it has become so safe that women dread it so. Childbirth will seldom be a pleasurable experience, but it is sure necessary foe the race, which is why it will never be an “individual†choice. I see that indonesia has learned nothing from seeing the downside of a shrinking and aging population, and is trying to “freeze its population side. With examples like that, it is quite evident that “choice†as an absolute is ultimately a falsehood.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
