Skip to comments.
Judge Kopf goes after Ted Cruz
http://gillette-torvik.blogspot.com/2015/07/judge-kopf-goes-after-ted-cruz.html ^
| JULY 7, 2015
| Bart Torvik
Posted on 07/07/2015 9:19:31 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
div class='post-body entry-content' id='post-body-54425470890256818' itemprop='description articleBody'> Richard Kopf is a senior district court judge for the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.
Ted Cruz is a United States Senator from Texas, and he is running for president as a Republican.
Judge Kopf does not care much for Senator Cruz.
His dislike stems from Cruz's proposal to amend the constitution to submit federal judges to retention elections. Based on this proposal, Judge Kopf declares:
Judge Kopf seems aware that he at least close to crossing a line by making such a statement:
As a federal judge, I am duty bound not to play politics. However, when a politician makes an extreme proposal to amend the Constitution and fundamentally alter and harm the federal judiciary and the Supreme Court, I have the right as a federal judge, and dare I say the duty, to respond to the proposal.
Judge Kopf's duty not to play politics is set out in Canon 5(A)(2) of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges. It is fairly straightforward: "A judge should not . . . make speeches for a political organization or candidate, or publicly endorse or oppose a candidate for public office."
I think Judge Kopf's blog post can reasonably be interpreted as opposing Ted Cruz's candidacy for president. Although, the bulk of his post is an attack on the merits of Cruz's proposal—which seems permissible—he cannot resist taking specific shots at Cruz's fitness as a candidate for president. Perhaps we can view those shots as mere rhetorical bluster, rather than a serious opposition to Cruz's candidacy. What do you think, Mr. Gillette?
Incidentally, Judge Kopf quotes George Will pointing out that Cruz's proposal is similar to Teddy Roosevelt's proposal, when running for president as a Progressive in 1912, to submit judges to recall elections. Teddy Roosevelt, of course, actually served as president and became so popular that he's literally on the Mount Rushmore of U.S. Presidents. This undercuts Judge Kopf's argument that a person proposing to overhaul the judiciary in this way is unfit to president.
TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: 2016election; cruz; election2016; tedcruz; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
"If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures." - Alexander Hamilton |
|
"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party over to the traitors in the battle just ended. We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support. Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldnt make any sense at all." -- President Ronald Reagan |
|
"A thing moderately good is not so good as it ought to be. Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice." - Thomas Paine 1792 |
|
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men." - Samuel Adams |
|
"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen." - Samuel Adams |
|
|
|
To: SoConPubbie; Kale; Jarhead9297; COUNTrecount; notaliberal; DoughtyOne; MountainDad; aposiopetic; ...
Ted Cruz Ping!
If you want on/off this ping list, please let me know.
Please beware, this is a high-volume ping list!
CRUZ or LOSE!
2
posted on
07/07/2015 9:20:17 AM PDT
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: SoConPubbie
Impeach him for lack of proper ethics.
3
posted on
07/07/2015 9:21:02 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
(Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
To: SoConPubbie
More like Judge Dummkopf.
4
posted on
07/07/2015 9:23:46 AM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(You can help: https://donate.tedcruz.org/c/FBTX0095/)
To: SoConPubbie
Nothing wrong with Proposing an Amendment, Judge Kopf, nothing wrong at all. If it passes muster to become a proposed amendment and then is ratified, it is the Law, and you Judge must support it. So there.
By the way, let’s pass a new Amendment to correct the deficiencies of the Tenth Amendment. Limit specifically what the Federal Govt can do.
5
posted on
07/07/2015 9:25:01 AM PDT
by
Nabber
To: SoConPubbie
Judge Kopf...if judges write law from the bench.. then they need to be submitted to a vote of the people
6
posted on
07/07/2015 9:25:21 AM PDT
by
tophat9000
(SCOTUS=Newspeak)
To: SoConPubbie
Richard Kopf?
Last name means “head”..
Is this satire?
7
posted on
07/07/2015 9:25:22 AM PDT
by
Darksheare
(Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
To: SoConPubbie
Ted Cruz is right and Judge Kopf proves it for him.
State legislatures should vote on the retention of federal judges. If the states hold the judges fate in their hands, those judges might not be so willing to step on the state powers.
8
posted on
07/07/2015 9:25:40 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Sad fact, most people just want a candidate to tell them what they want to hear)
To: SoConPubbie
Windbag judge. Though I suppose he has the right to so howl, but check his actions from his opinions.
9
posted on
07/07/2015 9:26:19 AM PDT
by
onedoug
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Probably has delusions of grandeur that one day he could be a rogue judge on the Supreme Court.
10
posted on
07/07/2015 9:26:34 AM PDT
by
gr8eman
(Don't waste your energy trying to understand commies. Use it to defeat them!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I was thinking Scheisskopf.
11
posted on
07/07/2015 9:27:18 AM PDT
by
Dr. Thorne
(The night is far spent, the day is at hand.- Romans 13:12)
To: SoConPubbie
Personally I wouldn’t mind seeing Kopf try and debate Ted Cruz on the issue. Might even pay money for the pleasure.
To: SoConPubbie
When a liberal judge says Cruz is not fit to be president you know you have the right man for the job.
Cruz consistently hurting (liberals will soon call it torturing) the enemy within.
Battling the enemy without and within... CRUZ 2016!
13
posted on
07/07/2015 9:28:21 AM PDT
by
PoloSec
( Believe the Gospel: how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again)
To: Darksheare
14
posted on
07/07/2015 9:29:38 AM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(My Batting Average( 1,000) (GOPe is that easy to read))
To: stephenjohnbanker
Probably could get into large amounts of trouble by referring to his name as it is defined..
15
posted on
07/07/2015 9:32:15 AM PDT
by
Darksheare
(Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
To: SoConPubbie
"Canon 5(A)(2) of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges. It is fairly straightforward: "A judge should not . . . make speeches for a political organization or candidate, or publicly endorse or
oppose a candidate for public office."
Yet Judge Kopf does. Guess Cruz left a mark on another little god-wannabe. Impeach for not following the Code of Conduct. SHTF, Kopf.
16
posted on
07/07/2015 9:34:31 AM PDT
by
A Navy Vet
(An Oath is Forever)
To: SoConPubbie
And you are not fit to be a judge.
17
posted on
07/07/2015 9:36:27 AM PDT
by
mulligan
(I)
To: SoConPubbie
Are Federal Judges Out Of Control? | Above the Law | Jul 14, 2014
Nine days ago, Judge Richard Kopf wrote an article about the Supreme Court's decision in Hobby Lobby that suggested, "[a]s the kids say, it is time for the Court to stfu."
18
posted on
07/07/2015 9:40:34 AM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: Darksheare
I heard he goes by Dick ...
To: Darksheare
20
posted on
07/07/2015 9:41:58 AM PDT
by
RedMDer
(Support Free Republic and Keep freedom ALIVE!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson