Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FCC votes to subsidize broadband connections for low-income households
BetaNews ^ | June 18, 2015 | Mark Wilson

Posted on 06/18/2015 9:55:35 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Today the FCC voted in favor of updating its Lifeline program to include broadband. This would mean that households surviving on low incomes would be able to receive help paying for a broadband connection. It might not be as important as electricity or water, but having a broadband connection is seen as being all but essential these days.

From helping with education and job hunting, to allowing for home working, the ability to get online is seen as so vital by some that there have been calls for it to be classed as a utility. The Lifeline program has been running since the 80s, and originally provided financial help to those struggling to pay for a phone line. It was expanded in 2008 to include wireless providers, and it is hoped that this third expansion will help more people to get online.

Announcing the decision to modernize the program, the FCC points out that less than half (48 percent) of households with an income under $25,000 had an internet connection at home. While it could be argued that internet access is possible through smartphones, the commission reveals that half of low income consumers have their mobile connections suspended or cancelled due to financial difficulties.

Broadband has become essential to participation in modern society, offering access to jobs, education, health care, government services and opportunity. Unfortunately, income remains a significant barrier to broadband adoption.

The broadband subsidy would remain at $9.25 and there are plans to "reduce waste, fraud and abuse". A third party would be used to verify the eligibility of households, and it would be required to retain documentation to allow for easier auditing. This would help to take pressure off ISPs, something that could be improved further by the use of subsidies being delivered directly to customers through the use of vouchers.


TOPICS: Computers/Internet; Government
KEYWORDS: broadband; electricity; fcc; freestuff; internet; obamanet; water
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
I can't wait for the gourmet food delivery trucks and the EBT-only fashion boutiques.
1 posted on 06/18/2015 9:55:35 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The Fascism is here. :)


2 posted on 06/18/2015 9:56:45 PM PDT by Tzimisce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I didn’t realize that they had that constitutional power.


3 posted on 06/18/2015 9:57:11 PM PDT by gorush (History repeats itself because human nature is static)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

good now poor americans can watch porn on the taxpayers dime.../s


4 posted on 06/18/2015 9:57:26 PM PDT by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I guess I’m in a super minority nowadays. Were I to have a household incoming of 25k or less, a smart phone, internet access - hell, a land-line phone, would be the *last* things on my mind.

How about food, rent, water, lights, and FINDING A BETTER JOB.

Yes, yes, I know.


5 posted on 06/18/2015 9:59:00 PM PDT by TheZMan (I am a secessionist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

That means they will also get a free ObamaComputer, otherwise how will they connect.


6 posted on 06/18/2015 9:59:26 PM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I already pay taxes for the local library to have it available to everyone who needs it.


7 posted on 06/18/2015 10:01:43 PM PDT by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aquila48

When I was a supervisor at a Dallas area unemployment office we were giving away nice laptops with complete software and one year of free Internet access to welfare recipients. That was almost 10 years ago.


8 posted on 06/18/2015 10:03:00 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You can help: https://donate.tedcruz.org/c/FBTX0095/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gorush
Unelected bureaucrats in various regulatory agencies seem to have TONS of powers that sound like they should belong to Congress.


9 posted on 06/18/2015 10:06:28 PM PDT by Impy (They pull a knife, you pull a gun. That's the CHICAGO WAY, and that's how you beat the rats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So much for the division of powers.


10 posted on 06/18/2015 10:13:55 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce

How does a government pay for all these social engineering projects? Through fiat, printed money and massive debt.

This and 1000 other nanny-state schemes could not exist if the USA had a “hard’ currency.


11 posted on 06/18/2015 10:14:26 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Proud2BeRight

Not to mention coffee shops, McDonalds, Target, Fred Meyer, etc. Not paid for with taxes, I know, but all “free”.


12 posted on 06/18/2015 10:16:25 PM PDT by ConjunctionJunction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Glad I’m not paying for that.


13 posted on 06/18/2015 10:21:30 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I assume this will be subsidized by a “lifeline” fee on current users.


14 posted on 06/18/2015 10:23:44 PM PDT by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It all comes from the same pot - the USF.
That “pot” was worth billions until GWBush allowed cell phones. It immediately went into the red.

Who pays into the pot ? Anybody with a phone line that’s not subsidized.

Based on the rewrite that now considers broadband as a utility, I’m guessing some sort of tax will be put on Internet service that will go into the USF pot.


15 posted on 06/18/2015 10:25:21 PM PDT by stylin19a (obama = Fredo Smart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gorush

Silly peasant!


16 posted on 06/18/2015 10:26:49 PM PDT by Eagles6 (Valley Forge Redux. If not now, when? If not here, where? If not us then who?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

Mussolini defined Fascism as the state taking over businesses that didn’t serve their customers.

The FCC stole broadband and is now forcing those companies to serve their customers “better”.

The Fascism is here and it’s called “consumer protection”.


17 posted on 06/18/2015 10:38:56 PM PDT by Tzimisce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: clearcarbon
It already is.

I looked over my phone bill this month. I paid thirteen dollars in taxes alone.

Over half of that goes to the Obamaphone/Obamanet slush funds.

18 posted on 06/18/2015 10:53:27 PM PDT by __rvx86 (Ted Cruz: Strike two.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Obamaphone has now morphed into Obamanet, despite the FCC not having jurisdiction.

Let the scams begin.


19 posted on 06/18/2015 10:56:06 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; All

As FReepers read this post, please bear in mind that the FCC’s constitutionally indefensible actions are a consequence of the ill-conceived 17th Amendment (17A) imo. More about 17A shortly.

Regarding FCC subsidized broadband connections, not only have the states never delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to tax and spend for such a purpose, but consider the following.

The Founding States had made the first numbered clauses in the Constitution, Sections 1-3 of Article I, to clarify that all federal legislative / regulatory powers are vested in the elected members of Congress, not in the executive or judicial branches, or in non-elected bureaucrats like those running the FCC and the EPA. So Congress has a constitutional monopoly on federal legislative / regulatory powers whether it wants it or not imo.

And by delegating such powers to non-elected bureaucrats —powers that Congress doesn’t have — corrupt Congress is wrongly protecting such powers from the wrath of the voters in blatant defiance of Sections 1-3 mentioned above imo.

Getting back to 17A, the basic reason that the FCC is getting away with buying votes for Democrats by subsidizing broadband connections is this imo. Corrupt senators did not do their job to protect their states by killing the constitutionally indefensible House appropriations bill(s) (1.7.1) which helped to establish such funds.

In fact, the Senate wrongly ignored its option to lead Congress to propose an appropriate amendment to the Constitution to the states (Article V) to properly establish this broadband connections project within the framework of the Constitution. And if the states had chosen to ratify the amendment then Congress, not the FCC, would have had the constitutional authority to vote to subsidize Internet broadband connections to win votes for Democrats.

The 17th Amendment needs to disappear, and a bunch of corrupt senators and Constitution-ignoring federal bureaucrats along with it.


20 posted on 06/18/2015 10:57:58 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson