Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/17/2015 7:51:53 AM PDT by MichCapCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MichCapCon

Natural gas to wind energy?

Seriously?

These people will fart in the general direction of windmills?


2 posted on 04/17/2015 7:55:07 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MichCapCon
--and as an aside to this, but pertintent in the "wind-solar" scams , while I can't speak to all of them one of the proposed solar farms just across the California border from where I live applied for a thirty mile natural gas pipeline , necessary "to keep the fluids warm"when the sun wasn't shining , assuring the public however that the natural gas had no part in the power generation---

--the whole project failed , however--must not even have been able to scam California for enough tax relief and subsidies----

3 posted on 04/17/2015 8:01:36 AM PDT by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the media or government says about firearms or explosives--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MichCapCon

What a confusing bunch of “comparison analogies”! And from a supposedly pro gas person.
No wonder the public never knows the truth.


4 posted on 04/17/2015 8:10:26 AM PDT by X-spurt (CRUZ missile - armed and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MichCapCon

The company that supplies power to my area bought into the phony “renewable energy” scam in a big way. Washington state passed laws requiring power companies to make 50% of their generation renewable - and as a kicker they excluded hydro. Effectively that leave solar (not so promising in this state!) and wind.

If you know anything about Washington state you know that it is bifurcated by the Cascade mountain range, leaving a western Washington (home of the loonies) and eastern Washington (home of the sagebrush). The wind is strong in eastern Washington (where the people and industry aren’t) and fickle on the west side. Naturally they built their wind farms on the east side - where 50% of the generated power is lost in transmission.

Now they boast of their green-ness but duck & run when customers complain about skyrocketing bills.


5 posted on 04/17/2015 8:12:58 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MichCapCon

Everywhere you see wind turbines, you’ll find crony capitalists. Like Tesla, they wouldn’t exist without favorable laws


6 posted on 04/17/2015 8:15:02 AM PDT by nascarnation (Impeach, convict, deport)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MichCapCon

So to generate 5% of your total energy usage 30% of your budget spent on thin air... Why don’t they build a river with a damn on campus or around a city which actually has some chance of producing a stream of energy with same amount of monies. Better yet, do not allow college campuses to take themselves off the public grid in any state but make them a customer of the state utilities.


7 posted on 04/17/2015 8:45:11 AM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MichCapCon

The capacity factor of wind is lucky to be even 35%. I would plan on 25%. Meaning 75% nat-gas generation. Nothing wrong with that. Gas is cheap and plentiful. But do we have to have expensive and ugly windmills all over Michigan?


8 posted on 04/17/2015 9:05:49 AM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson