Posted on 04/06/2015 8:11:19 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
New York Congressman Steve Israel and a photo of an AR-15 which includes 3D printed parts.
Gun rights groups from Defense Distributed to the NRA to Come and Take It Texas will not be pleased with the latest piece of proposed legislation from Congressman Steve Israel. Israel, a representative from New York state, first called for legislation to ban 3D printed guns. Israels bill has gotten little traction at this point, but he says hes not about to give up the fight.
In fact, Israel says hell be reintroducing legislation aimed at banning 3D printed, or for that matter, all fully-plastic firearms.
Called the Undetectable Firearms Modernization Act, Israels first failed attempt would have forbidden possessing or manufacturing any type of firearm capable of sneaking under the notice of any standard metal detector.
Israel says the proposed legislation which was co-sponsored by Republican Representative Peter King was meant to make certain criminals and terrorists cant produce guns that can easily be made undetectable.
Security checkpoints will do little good if criminals can produce plastic firearms and bring those firearms through metal detectors into secure areas like airports or courthouses, Israel told WIRED. When I started talking about the issue of completely plastic firearms, I was told the idea of a plastic gun is science-fiction. That science-fiction is now a dangerous reality.
Israel says he originally wanted to create penalties for anyone who chooses to build a weapon or weapon component using a 3D printer without the proper permitting and licensing. Though he now says he wont be targeting anyone who uses a 3D printer specifically, its fairly clear his push for this legislation arose from the welter of news stories surrounding firearms such as the Liberator by gun access group Defense Distributed.
Cody Wilson with the Liberator .380-3D Printed Gun.
Cody Wilson, the founder of Defense Distributed, has made no secret of his intention to do his best to thwart any such legislation via technology and free information.
While its not currently feasible to produce a reasonably safe handgun which uses no metallic components, an entirely 3D printed gun may some day be legally produced with non-metallic materials as advancement in such materials is moving forward at a furious pace. In fact Wilson is currently trying to get his hands on a Mark Forged Mark One 3D Printer, which is capable of printing with a mixture of thermoplastic and fibers, such as Kevlar, carbon fiber, and fiberglass. Mark Forged refused to sell him their printer, but Wilson has publicly sought an alternative route, offering a large sum of money to anyone willing to get him one of these advanced machines.
The Undetectable Firearms Act was renewed last year, but it makes no specific mention of 3D printing. With that said, Israel says his new bill is aimed at making sure current iterations of 3D printed guns cant be legally produced without the proper licensing and marketing.
The law still lags behind recent innovations in DIY gunsmithing as the lower receiver of an AR-15 semi-automatic rifle can be printed or milled and the rest of the weapon is legally available. In fact, Defense Distributed sells a simple CNC mill capable of creating those lower receivers from aluminum.
Michael Weinberg, an analyst who works as general counsel at 3D printing service bureau Shapeways, told WIRED his company was not in favor of any bill which would make 3D printing a gun illegal. Weinberg is the author of It Will Be Awesome If They Dont Screw it Up: 3D Printing, Intellectual Property, and the Fight Over the Next Great Disruptive Technology and Whats the Deal with Copyright and 3D Printing? Weinberg regularly writes about and speaks on the policy implications of emerging technologies in the press and at events.
Where do you stand on the issue of 3D printed firearms? Should legislature be put in place blocking you or me from printing guns from the privacy of our own homes? Let us know in the Bill to Ban 3D Printed Firearms forum thread on 3DPB.com.
It's a considerably greater threat to liberty. Consider what New York representatives have done to your 2nd amendment rights, and now consider what Iran has done to your 2nd amend rights. Go down the list, taxes, free speech, 0bamacare, etc. and compare how NY's representatives have voted against freedom on every issue, and now look at Iran and ask yourself what have they done to restrict my freedom?
No he doesn't; he isn't actually that stupid. This is a ban designed to restrict freedom for LAW ABIDING citizens. You know, you and me the ones they want to make sure are unable to resist tyranny. Criminals aren't any threat to the government (you don't see crooks stealing guns from police stations - just corrupt cops), and terrorists are a blessing to the government because they provide a convenient excuse to remove freedom.
Unless the oath of office is enforced it’s just a quaint old ceremony.
Oh yeah, that’ll work. I believe that narcotics are also illegal, and how successful is that embargo?
Where there is a demand, there is a supply.
Yes. And unless the constitution starts bring enforced it’s just a quaint olde scrap of paper
That's because criminals run the government. Many politicians enter office with meager means, yet become rich after a few years in office. The salaries aren't that good. Clintons are famously rich from politics. Senator Feinstein pushed for a useless high-speed train in California, and surprise surprise, her husband Dick Blum gets the contract to build it. Feinstein introduced legislation to give $25 billion to the FDIC which then awarded a big bucks contract to Dick Blum to sell foreclosed properties. Hypocrite Feinstein carries concealed guns while denying them to ordinary citizens.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.