Posted on 04/06/2015 8:11:19 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
New York Congressman Steve Israel and a photo of an AR-15 which includes 3D printed parts.
Gun rights groups from Defense Distributed to the NRA to Come and Take It Texas will not be pleased with the latest piece of proposed legislation from Congressman Steve Israel. Israel, a representative from New York state, first called for legislation to ban 3D printed guns. Israel’s bill has gotten little traction at this point, but he says he’s not about to give up the fight.
In fact, Israel says he’ll be reintroducing legislation aimed at banning 3D printed, or for that matter, all fully-plastic firearms.
Called the Undetectable Firearms Modernization Act, Israel’s first failed attempt would have forbidden possessing or manufacturing any type of firearm capable of sneaking under the notice of any standard metal detector.
Israel says the proposed legislation which was co-sponsored by Republican Representative Peter King was meant to make certain “criminals and terrorists can’t produce guns that can easily be made undetectable.”
“Security checkpoints will do little good if criminals can produce plastic firearms and bring those firearms through metal detectors into secure areas like airports or courthouses,” Israel told WIRED. “When I started talking about the issue of completely plastic firearms, I was told the idea of a plastic gun is science-fiction. That science-fiction is now a dangerous reality.”
Israel says he originally wanted to create penalties for anyone who chooses to build a weapon or weapon component using a 3D printer without the proper permitting and licensing. Though he now says he won’t be targeting anyone who uses a 3D printer specifically, it’s fairly clear his push for this legislation arose from the welter of news stories surrounding firearms such as the Liberator by gun access group Defense Distributed.
Cody Wilson with the Liberator .380-3D Printed Gun.
Cody Wilson, the founder of Defense Distributed, has made no secret of his intention to do his best to thwart any such legislation via technology and free information.
While it’s not currently feasible to produce a reasonably safe handgun which uses no metallic components, an entirely 3D printed gun may some day be legally produced with non-metallic materials as advancement in such materials is moving forward at a furious pace. In fact Wilson is currently trying to get his hands on a Mark Forged Mark One 3D Printer, which is capable of printing with a mixture of thermoplastic and fibers, such as Kevlar, carbon fiber, and fiberglass. Mark Forged refused to sell him their printer, but Wilson has publicly sought an alternative route, offering a large sum of money to anyone willing to get him one of these advanced machines.
The Undetectable Firearms Act was renewed last year, but it makes no specific mention of 3D printing. With that said, Israel says his new bill is aimed at making sure current iterations of 3D printed guns can’t be legally produced without the proper licensing and marketing.
The law still lags behind recent innovations in DIY gunsmithing as the lower receiver of an AR-15 semi-automatic rifle can be printed or milled and the rest of the weapon is legally available. In fact, Defense Distributed sells a simple CNC mill capable of creating those lower receivers from aluminum.
Michael Weinberg, an analyst who works as general counsel at 3D printing service bureau Shapeways, told WIRED his company was not in favor of any bill which would make 3D printing a gun illegal. Weinberg is the author of “It Will Be Awesome If They Don’t Screw it Up: 3D Printing, Intellectual Property, and the Fight Over the Next Great Disruptive Technology and What’s the Deal with Copyright and 3D Printing?” Weinberg regularly writes about and speaks on the policy implications of emerging technologies in the press and at events.
Where do you stand on the issue of 3D printed firearms? Should legislature be put in place blocking you or me from printing guns from the privacy of our own homes? Let us know in the Bill to Ban 3D Printed Firearms forum thread on 3DPB.com.
Ban politicians. At least ban the ones with stupid mindsets, like that NY congressman Steve Israel. He really thinks criminals and terrorists will go through the trouble of 3D printing, when they can easily buy guns on the black market? Oh, it's about plastic guns. Well, some terrorists caused some major mayhem with some box cutters, yet they haven't banned the manufacture, sale, or possession of those box cutters.
As you say, ban all terrorists. But the lawmakers, enforcers, and jailers seem hell-bent on ignoring them and going after law-abiding citizens instead. Stupid politicians.
Apparently Congress could do so and have it pass judicial muster =>
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3276464/posts?page=13#13
Molon Labe.....The cats out of the bag.
Need to ban most materials. The Periodic Chart is a danger to libs....
Need to ban most materials. The Periodic Chart is a danger to libs....
I'm pretty sure that I have the tech to make a firearm since I've got a lathe and milling machine. I don't need CNC.
/johnny
For some reason the link you posted keeps bringing me back to this same thread.
All the hype about 3D printed guns is quite funny when you can make or finish a really nice lower receiver with an inexpensive CNC milling machine. Of course it is cheaper and probably easier in most cases to do it starting with a partially completed lower with jigs and common tools.
See post #13 re the Raich and Stewart decisions. According to established case law, the Commerce Clause permits Congress to criminalize 3D printed guns for private ownership.
The moron thinks criminals and terrorists won’t break his law.
That guy says he charges $350 for a new hammer (I am sure you can find them cheaper)
Nice little write up! I have seen other designs that take even less effort to put together. Nearly all of them seem like they would be more durable than a printed plastic gun.
Wilson would do well to have a corporation not legally connected to him formed by a friend somewhere outside of Texas. Have its name indicate something to do with manufacturing, modeling or sculpting, and he will be able to obtain whatever he wants. He is too well known in that industry to buy the most capable equipment. Time to get serious, and stop delays due to anti-gunners in the industry.
Israel swore to uphold the constitution of the United States.
I say he should be impeached and removed from office if he won’t
Good luck banning a cat already out of the bag.
A file and a little sand paper will purdy that thing right up...
See post #13. According to established case law, the Commerce Clause permits Congress to criminalize 3D printed guns for private ownership.
Raich is even worse than that: it is the government asserting that not-commerce is regulable by the commerce clause; or as Thomas said in his dissent:
If Congress can regulate this under the Commerce Clause, then it can regulate virtually anything–and the Federal Government is no longer one of limited and enumerated powers.
Yeah because look at all the people in NY who’ve died as a result of 3d printed guns. It’s the g-damn zombie apocalypse.
Maryland and Illinois are right there with New York. Then there’s California.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.