the media stopped dealing in facts long long ago
Notice, however, they never call Jesus “The Messiah”...
They are terrified of Islam and idolize the murderous savages.
I’m waiting to hear in our media that Islamist terrorists have killed followers of Jesus, the Savior.
They call him the prophet because calling him the pedophile hits too close to home
Because they’re all hip and think his words are written on the subway walls and tenement halls
Apparently, Mohammed was having these dreams....as many prophets do....and we wound up with “Kill all the Christians and Jews”...Evermore
Because ANY “religion” is better, more valid, more sacred, more revered then the EVIL and HATEFUL and RACIST religion of the Bitter Clingers of the Reviled Bible Belt of the United Crackers of America.
Just channeling the average nosepicking Salon writer there...
It's probably because they are cowardly, hypocritical a$$holes.
Either that or they're muslims.
A lot of what they do is based on hatred for and retaliation against conservatives.
They use the term “The Prophet” because they’re trying to push our buttons. I really think this is the primary reason.
Secondary reasons include wanting to feel self important that they can “see it from the muslim point of view” etc.
Third on the list is they’re actually afraid and want to ingratiate themselves with the jihadists. Kissing up to the bully of the neighborhood, in other words.
I was sadly disappointed to hear the Fauxies using that term regularly... Even Katherine Herridge, whom I normally respect.
..................
I guess they just don’t want to get bombed, shot or beheaded.
.................
Of course at the Other MSM, they are not only fearful of the headchoppers, they fear to be non-PC, and side more with the muslims than the civilized world./
Well, at least when the news media mentions his name they do not say “Peace be upon him” after every time they mention “the profit”.
How funny.
Some are ignorant of the truth about Mo. . Some just trying to be courteous without thinking it through. And some are on the take, sold out to the islamonazis
whether he is a prophet is a mater of faith but what is known for sure was that he was a will known historic figure that is will known with in his own fallowing as being a pedophile. so I propose instead of referring to him as the prophet we refer to him in the media with the title “Mohammad the pedophile” at least that title is based on excepted facts presented by those that are true believers.
mohammed was a child rapist.
That’s more historically accurate than “prophet”.
I put it in the same category as why the homos have been allowed to subvert the use of the word ‘gay’. It’s because those who control the language control the debate….always. In the case of homos, now that they got everyone comfortable with using the word ‘gay’, those who use the word are essentially acknowledging without saying so that ‘gayness’ is an inherent natural condition… after all, they are already using a word that names it as an entity supposedly for what it is i.e. gay. Another example of this has to do with the entire abortion industry….. it’s not called a baby, it’s a fetus (makes it easier to justify the killing of him/her). So this brings us to the Moose Limbs…. By getting the news media comfortable with referring to their supposed founder as ‘the prophet’, the media is essentially acknowledging the stature and validity of the belief without further comment.