Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/31/2014 4:21:05 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet; AFPhys; AD from SpringBay; ADemocratNoMore; aimhigh; AnalogReigns; archy; ...
3-D Printer Ping!

Some day her prints will come…

2 posted on 12/31/2014 4:31:06 PM PST by null and void (The aggregate effect of competitive capitalism is indistinguishable from magic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

can I print some new 3 D Neighbors??


3 posted on 12/31/2014 4:33:03 PM PST by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So, now they’ve got a printer that can make three Ds. Big deal. I made four Ds in the fifth grade.


4 posted on 12/31/2014 4:34:37 PM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Most people think about the near future of the 3D printer to be just better versions of the printers we have now.

It will not work out that way though.

It will be necessary to have many different types of “printers” all working together to build very complex designs.

Don’t think of a single device, think of a huge number of tiny autonomous devices working separately or in tandem with a large printer.

It will not be necessary to have an enormous printer that can create a house... instead it will be better to have say 100,000 very small devices working together to build a house.

It’s also better to have a huge number of nano-scale machines inside a human body doing repair and construction rather then a large device building biological parts for a surgeon to implant.

The idea is to have the power of the computer merged with capable devices that can build thing in the real world. A large device that sits on a desktop and cranks out plastic parts is very far from what the technology will soon become.


7 posted on 12/31/2014 4:56:00 PM PST by Bobalu (Please excuse the crudity of this model. I didn't have time to build it to scale or paint it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I would just like to be able to buy one at a cheap price that doesn’t look like it was made out of Tinker Toys and Legos.


10 posted on 12/31/2014 4:58:51 PM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The government will want to approve the design of nearly every product that can be fabricated, in much the same fashion that FDA approves drugs for use. Unfortunately, this will be a costly progress that will retard development of many useful items, at least in this country where government controls all.


11 posted on 12/31/2014 5:01:10 PM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“...this will be a costly progress”

**********
Opps, typo. Should be “costly process”.


12 posted on 12/31/2014 5:04:52 PM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“the eyewear industry hasn’t seen much innovation since Benjamin Franklin invented bifocals.”

Either one of two things here: 1) the guy doesn’t need eye ware and is therefore ignorant (lacking in knowledge) on the subject or 2) the guy is just an idiot.

My glasses 30 years ago would be nearly an inch thick and cost me close to a thousand dollars (inflation adjusted) and take me weeks to get. Now with advanced polymers and increased choices I get them in a week at maybe $150 depending on how much I splurge and the Ben Franklin bifocals are progressive lenses that have a multitude of focal points without any lines.

That being said - the gist of the article regarding things to watch for is on task.


14 posted on 12/31/2014 5:11:11 PM PST by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary for good men to do nothings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Great, we can start making nuclear weapon designs and prototypes and bid on US Government contracts to supply arms for national defense. Then we can use the proceeds to fund our own political party.


20 posted on 12/31/2014 5:24:37 PM PST by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"1. Printing your own organs and prosthetic body parts"

Heh! Heh! He said "organs"!


22 posted on 12/31/2014 5:32:43 PM PST by Flag_This (You can't spell "treason" without the "O".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Hey! How about a Stepford-type wife?


25 posted on 12/31/2014 6:53:43 PM PST by spel_grammer_an_punct_polise (Why does every totalitarian, political hack think that he knows how to run my life better than I do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’m looking at a 3D printer so I can create better model railroad buildings. I am looking to try create more boating products and model railroad products. (Watching Shark Tank, so I love to try new products...)


26 posted on 12/31/2014 7:10:00 PM PST by ExCTCitizen (I'm ExCTCitizen and I approve this reply. If it does offend Libs, I'm NOT sorry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Can a 3d printer make another 3 d printer?


34 posted on 01/01/2015 1:31:15 AM PST by NoLibZone (I voted for Mitt. The lesser of 2 evils religious argument put a black nationalist in the W.H.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson