Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/30/2014 4:30:36 PM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: lowbridge

Oh noes!! Now what Batman??


2 posted on 09/30/2014 4:33:03 PM PDT by BipolarBob (You can't fix stupid but you can vote them out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

The document is very clear. And the purpose was to have the exchanges run by the states...period.


3 posted on 09/30/2014 4:33:18 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Roberts will rescue them.


4 posted on 09/30/2014 4:33:49 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Kudos to judge White, he’s right.


5 posted on 09/30/2014 4:36:07 PM PDT by jazusamo (Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

This only works when a “federal judge” sides with the liberals.

Conservative judges, not so much.


6 posted on 09/30/2014 4:36:26 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

SWEET!!!!


7 posted on 09/30/2014 4:42:21 PM PDT by MeganC (It took Democrats four hours to deport Elian Gonzalez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

The man with the pen and phone will just write another executive order making it okay.


8 posted on 09/30/2014 4:43:12 PM PDT by teacherwoes (Alethephobia-fear of hearing the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Does anyone know the actual effect this ruling has on IRS operations. I assume a time was left open for appeals. But would the judge have any power to enforce his ruling. And if so then what kind of penalties could he enact to force compliance with the ruling. Won’t the IRS just laugh at him in this day and age.


10 posted on 09/30/2014 4:44:36 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Finally a beheading that might provoke a comment from the White House.


15 posted on 09/30/2014 5:07:26 PM PDT by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

This should be a slam dunk even for the most retarded court. It was in an early draft and removed.


16 posted on 09/30/2014 5:09:45 PM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

I miss the rule of law, but from time to time I wonder if it might return. My guess: probably not while the druggie is in our White House.

The court is correct. ObamaCare explicitly requires state exchanges for the subsidies, and even the petty thug in charge lacks the authority to spend that money in violation of the law.


18 posted on 09/30/2014 5:19:19 PM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Judge Ron White AKA Tater Salad.


20 posted on 09/30/2014 6:26:12 PM PDT by TurboZamboni (Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.-JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

“Will Supreme court weigh in?”

More than likely, since there are now enough conflicting rulings from different circuit courts, even if the DC court of appeals rules in Obama’s favor.


21 posted on 09/30/2014 6:44:03 PM PDT by ScottfromNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

It appears this judge based his ruling on the common sense and constitutional view that congress is one entity regardless of which political party has majority control at any given time and if that body wants the law to be changed, they have the power to do so. The previous rulings upholding the IRS regulations obviously bought into the liberal view that since the political winds have changed and the congress as now constituted does not desire to change the law, it is legitimate for the courts to make the corrections they believe the original congress would make if they were still in control.

I tend to think that when this gets to the Supreme Court, at least one and possibly two of the liberal justices will uphold this opinion.


24 posted on 09/30/2014 7:56:06 PM PDT by etcb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

does anyone expect the government will abide by the ruling anyway?


26 posted on 09/30/2014 8:49:47 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Video: Hitler Finds Out He Can’t Keep His Health Care Plan …Period
http://www.ironicsurrealism.com/2013/11/09/video-hitler-finds-out-he-cant-keep-his-health-care-plan-or-doctor-period/


28 posted on 09/30/2014 11:14:19 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (The question isn't who is going to let me; it's who is going to stop me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Since Obamacare is perpetually being “legislated” (rewritten) as an open-ended law, this little,problem should be solved easily with a new edict.


31 posted on 10/01/2014 4:47:12 AM PDT by fwdude (The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson