This comes perilously close to the Anchor advocating for people to murder open carriers.
1 posted on
08/04/2014 6:34:16 AM PDT by
marktwain
To: marktwain
Lucas McCain might have something to say about that.
To: marktwain
Many of those who want a disarmed population advocate for death to armed citizens.Hmm they have made the choice for those of us who don't want to be disarmed pretty simple - a straight dichotomy. It appears that they want kill us so when confronted by a deadly threat what can you do? A couple of hundred of the more outspoken advocates of murdering those of us who believe in freedom given a dose of their own medicine might prove educational for the rest.
4 posted on
08/04/2014 6:48:15 AM PDT by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
To: marktwain
Not even close, he’s over the line.
IMO anyone who says “I believe in the second amendment, but..” doesn’t support the second amendment.
5 posted on
08/04/2014 6:54:06 AM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: marktwain
What would stop him? Common sense and a lack of hoplophobia.
6 posted on
08/04/2014 6:54:41 AM PDT by
bolobaby
To: marktwain
Everyone spot the basic assumption that the presence of a gun not in the hands of law enforcement inherently is an “imminent danger”?
8 posted on
08/04/2014 6:56:37 AM PDT by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: marktwain
Let’s see. I bet he’s against any sort of stand your ground laws in which someone can defend themselves against an aggressor. Here, he is fine with aggressors attacking someone who happens peacefully open carry.
11 posted on
08/04/2014 7:07:39 AM PDT by
ilgipper
To: marktwain
Liberals believe that simply wanting a firearm is proof of paranoia and you should be refused on the grounds of mental instability.
13 posted on
08/04/2014 7:10:13 AM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(The cure has become worse than the disease. Support an end to the WOD now.)
To: FRiends
As far as the left is concerned, Americans cannot
be trusted with these high capacity lead delivery systems.
Click the Pic
Support Free Republic
14 posted on
08/04/2014 7:11:53 AM PDT by
deoetdoctrinae
(Gun-free zones are playgrounds for felons.)
To: marktwain
This is why guns should be outlawed - for leftists. They simply lack the common sense necessary to responsibly possess them.
15 posted on
08/04/2014 7:12:11 AM PDT by
rockrr
(Everything is different now...)
To: marktwain
This Libtard and all the people he knows think just like him.
All Guns are evil. ...prefer only an armed government.
To: marktwain
A slung long gun is about as immediately dangerous as a doughnut.
Hoplophobes are stupid.
21 posted on
08/04/2014 8:06:04 AM PDT by
Dead Corpse
(Tri nornar eg bir. Binde til rota...)
To: marktwain
Could we apply that logic to Blowing away people with other lethal objects?
Cars, trucks, tractors, baseball bats, knives, gasoline, flour
22 posted on
08/04/2014 9:39:24 AM PDT by
HammerT
(The Right to keep and bear arms: A Commonsense Civil Right)
"Is freedom anything else than the right to live as we wish?
Nothing else." ~Epictetus
God bless this site, this Free Republic.
Please click the pic
23 posted on
08/04/2014 9:41:07 AM PDT by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: marktwain
Phoenix Anchor Says Arizonans should be able to "Blow Away" People with a Rifle on their ShoulderWith what?
A hair dryer?
< /sarc >
28 posted on
08/04/2014 12:57:56 PM PDT by
publius911
( Politicians come and go... but the (union) bureaucracy lives and grows forever.)
To: marktwain
"Someones carrying a gun, and they're with their children, and they see a man walk into a Starbucks with a rifle on his shoulder. What would stop them from blowing your client away? I cant believe that the blind illogic of this statement has eluded everyone.
For this someone with kids to blow away the person with a rifle on his shoulder that person would have to be carrying a firearm.
So why would a person carrying a firearm immediately see this person as a threat? For a person to carry a firearm it almost a foregone conclusion that they do not view persons carrying a firearm as being an inherent threat.
32 posted on
08/05/2014 12:53:31 AM PDT by
Pontiac
(The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson