Me neither.
He’ll be hanging back in the SWAT entry crowd for sure.
And the Police State’s noose gets tighter & tighter...
“When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes mandatory” ... Thomas Jefferson (words to live by)
Once the liberals get in charge, they hire only “fellow travelers” (other liberals/socialists/commies)
That is whay openly gay in the military is so important to them. They want to be able to promote the “right people” and purge others
Another friendly neighborhood Peace Officer.
Connecticut: “Constitution State” my ass.....
Good for him.
So.... why doesn't he name this cop's name, or badge number, or something?
Jack booted thugs are alike no matter where they are.
“Heals” is not what the comments came on-”heels” are...
With all due respect-the fact that the author has not taken the time to use proper grammar does not inspire confidence in their reporting...
Reality is of little interest to Connecticut politicians when theyre intent on making a statement. They thought that they could compel everyone to think as they do about gun control by threatening those who disagree with a felony. It didnt work.
Faced with 300,000 potential offenders, officials must decide whether to ignore the new law, or enforce it by sending SWAT teams to raid the homes of anyone suspected of owning the most popular rifle in America, the AR-15.
As author Radley Balko documented in The Rise of the Warrior Cop, sending squads crashing through doors unannounced in the middle of the night frequently results in death and injury for innocent bystanders.
Even family pets arent spared. Rampaging cops in Prince Georges County, Md., for example, killed Chase and Payton, the gentle Labrador retrievers belonging to Berwyn Heights Mayor Cheye Calvo. The cops expected to find drugs in the raid; instead, they terrorized an innocent family.
Repeating similar scenes 300,000 times in Connecticut would create the very gun violence that the misguided registration law was supposed to prevent. Even if all of these citizens turned themselves in peacefully, it would bankrupt the state.
Currently, Connecticuts 15 prisons hold 16,839 behind bars at an annual cost of $620 million. Full compliance with the gun law would exceed the entire state budget at $55 billion.
Read more: http://p.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/feb/19/editorial-connecticuts-gun-revolt/#ixzz2vZguyMgc
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
The real travesty is that they got the law on the books and it will never be repealed. The politicians will just tell the enforcement agencies to ignore it, which they will with a big sigh of relief. But the “law” will still be there until the next (and there will be a next whether or not the law is enforced or not) school, mall or theater shooting by some walking free maniac. Then they will pull out the law and say, “see, We told you so.”
Someone should ask these Conn cops to explain why it took them so long to enter a school where kids were being slaughtered while their heroes waited outside.
Thug with a gun.
I hear that Putin needs more mindless thugs to occupy countries which would be more suited to this a-holes mind set.
They will run out of SWAT guys before Connecticut runs out of guns.
I have a purely theoretical academic question: Will a .308 penetrate that combat gear those storm troopers are wearing?
I never want to hear anyone bad-mouthing the Nazis from this time forward. It's becoming quite clear that Nuremberg was a kangaroo court.
A good response to that cop would be:
“And I just can’t wait for your political masters to be voted out of office, so you can look for work in another state.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=se7VtF4Cu7U&app=desktop
Anytime you hear common sense gun laws or common sense gun restrictions, it means confiscation to them, he told Visconti. Thats the only common sense thing to the people who are spewing this out. It means confiscation in the end.
Visconti is the only *hope* out there for pro-gun people in CT....and he has a huge uphill battle.