Check out article, then #4, #31, #46, #48.
Thanks, Seizethecarp.
Posted on 02/19/2014 6:04:08 PM PST by Seizethecarp
From Sharon Rondeau's notes on the audio of Boyles' interview of Volin at the link:
Regarding his Sheriff’s Kits, Volin said “I have doctors calling me and asking for 20 copies.” He said that Obamacare is slashing work hours and that people are “getting angry” about Obama’s actions, which then translate to their looking harder at the questions surrounding Obama.
In response to Boyles’s question about an announcement from the Cold Case Posse next month, Volin responded that new information will be released, perhaps in “the middle of March,” and that prosecutions will follow. In December, Tea Party Power Hour host and citizen researcher Mark Gillar had announced the same in a video sent to The Post & Email.
(Excerpt) Read more at birtherreport.com ...
Instead of Mark Levin pushing this Article V convention stuff...why wasn’t he concerned with the Constitutional abuses from Obama regarrding his eligibility?Why? Because Mark Levin is a constitutional coward and a weakling hypocrite more concerned about his own career and comfort than protecting the Constitution or preserving our great republic. No doubt he was threatened by aka obama and his minions and was cowed into yellow-stripe-backed compliance. The man's a weakling, but I could overlook that if only he had just keep his mouth shut instead of going out of his way to ridicule even the slightest mention of eligibility doubts.
Obama ineligibility is a much bigger constitutional issue than some “convention”
The man is dead to me.
I will gloat over their anxiety. It will give me great good cheer.
Thanks for the Ping. “Falcon” is my favorite poster at ORYR.
Paging Denis McDonough, Valerie Jarrett, Bob Bauer, Nancy Pelosi, Juan McCain, William "Guilty as Sin, Free as a Bird" Ayers, and on and on and on. In a just world, we'd be facing a shortage of lamppost space.
From your keyboard to God's Inbox!
You may be right about Levin. However, discussing the issue might be somewhat out of his hands and is in the hands of those who employ him instead.
Consider how the IRS and other alphabets have been used against the administration's enemies and the power "they" have over who gets to have and keep an FCC license.
"Say...that's a nice FCC license you have there...be a shame if something were to happen to it"
Those audits and such can be expensive and they just keep coming until you "behave" or your money runs out.
Butterdezillion, maggief, hoosiermama, LucyT
Ping to #46.
Explains the intimidation done to the media.
Also can explain why individuals don’t unload on 0; they don’t want to get mercilessly audited.
Many thanks, GBA!
The media heads were specifically threatened with that in October of 2008 if they allowed anybody to report on Obama’s eligibility problem or Muslim leanings, according to a signed statement by one of the on-air personalities to whom the media heads conveyed the threats - and corroborated by other witnesses as well, according to Doug Hagmann and confirmed by Cold Case Posse commander Mike Zullo.
The on-air personalities were told their careers would be over if they or any of their guests allowed the issue to be discussed - and it was implied that their lives and their loved ones’ lives would be questionable as well. Zullo confirmed that a very central witness to those threats has fled the country in fear for her life and the life of her child.
According to Hagman those threats originated directly from George Soros, David Axelrod, and Rahm Emanuel.
The DNC’s mafia.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3125061/posts
Why is the Obama Administration Putting Government Monitors in Newsrooms?
ACLJ.org ^ | Feb 19, 2014 | Matthew Clark
Why is the Obama Administration Putting Government Monitors in Newsrooms?
The Obama Administration’s Federal Communication Commission (FCC) is poised to place government monitors in newsrooms across the country in an absurdly draconian attempt to intimidate and control the media.
Before you dismiss this assertion as utterly preposterous (we all know how that turned out when the Tea Party complained that it was being targeted by the IRS), this bombshell of an accusation comes from an actual FCC Commissioner.
FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai reveals a brand new Obama Administration program that he fears could be used in “pressuring media organizations into covering certain stories.”
As Commissioner Pai explains in the Wall Street Journal:
Since I moved into the area, one of the local Limbaugh carriers has had a series of fairly decent conservatives after him from 3-6 PM.
The last since Barry oh... took office was somewhat vocal about eligibility, muslim influence, Christianity, etc. and was promptly terminated when his contract was up.
From that point on, other than Limbaugh and George Noory, the station has since become moderate to liberal and about as palatable as a bucket of warm piss.
“If you have an FCC license, you can keep your FCC license. Period!”
Check out article, then #4, #31, #46, #48.
Thanks, Seizethecarp.
“....The last since Barry oh... took office was somewhat vocal about eligibility,muslim influence,Christianity,etc. and was promptly terminated when his contract was up.....”
Which broadcaster was it? What was his/her name?
I suspect/believe now that there are many more persons involved than just Soros, Axelrod and Immanual. Add Ayres and his communist father who was a rich utilities person, add Valerie Jarett a Muslim , add Axelrods parents who were well known communists on the Chicago scene. However, the Chicago cabal was just one end of Obama’s political lifeline. I am reminded of my fishing days with reel, line and hook as to Obama. Chicago was the baited hook, Obama’s mother’s moving around the world was the line for her son Obama and the reel was in SE Asia in Indonesia by a cult known as Subud ruled by a man known as Muhammed Sabuh who looked very much like Obama. There are dots that connect all these people and places like hook, line and reel. I suspect that Arpaio and his associates have a corresponding scenario to be told.
There are a lot of sensible voters in his district (am one of them) and, at the moment, I will say he has a very good chance of regaining the office.
What is particularly encouraging is that Barr understands the bulk of the effort will be to achieve a conviction in the senate. The Republican Senate leadership cut the legs out from under the House the last time around - it did not want to give Gore the advantage of campaigning while sitting in the Oval Office. If the Dems happen to hold the senate on this occasion, Bob Barr is most likely to go forward with such a strong case that all but the most liberal Dems will have to convict.
The challenge will be in the timing - to either gain a conviction or a resignation (IMO more likely) just days before the next presidential election.
Vince Coakley
“The Republican Senate leadership cut the legs out from under the House the last time around - it did not want to give Gore the advantage of campaigning while sitting in the Oval Office.”
If true, then that strategy worked for the party, if not for the moral rectitude of the country. Bush failed to gain the popular vote and just barely won the electoral college.
I suspect that the public polling was against impeachment in the states where GOP-e senators were voting against conviction as the country was in the middle of the dot-com market bubble and the “don’t wreak the party” crowd was yelling loudly.
Given the close results of that election, it certainly appears so.
Of course, the clarity of hindsight might cause some to question whether four years of Gore would have been preferable to four years of Hillary.
My point is for those who seek impeachment/conviction or perhaps any other means of stopping or even just delaying the juggernaut, Barr's involvement would seem to offer the best opportunity.
Barr has got guts and will take whatever “Universe-Shattering” discovery Arpaio has come up with to Congress in 2015. That is if he gets back in and if Barry hasn’t been pushed out yet in the way that Nixon when the evidence was so strong that his own party couldn’t support him.
The cabal that was in power the put Hill-billy in power also put O at the helm. Gore is also a wing of that party. As are Reid Nancy P etc
Unless the taking down of O exposes to their followers the true face and intentions of that party the is no point in removing O. It must be done in a way that any one connected to the group is cloaked in suspicion and totally embarassed to be connected to them in any manner. ..... Complete termination of their entire philosophy aka nazi of Germany .... Or the beast will rear it head again in the form of another.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.