Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GM's Advertising Identity Crisis Hurting Sales (FR thread linked)
NLPC ^ | October 17, 2013 | Mark Modica

Posted on 10/17/2013 11:01:55 AM PDT by jazusamo

Volt gay ad

It looks like General Motors is going through an identity crisis as its marketing strategy has flip-flopped by changing its targeted audience. The new General Motors' truck ad, "Strong," targets conservatives by honoring a heroic and manly GM truck buyer with lyrics that describe him as a "love one woman for all his life" type of guy who arrived at work on time for twenty straight years. The rugged, heterosexual identity of today's GM differs greatly from last year's politically correct version when the company won praise for running a "gay" Chevy Volt ad and for flying rainbow banners to celebrate America's sexual diversity.

As mentioned recently on NLPC, the new GM truck ads have done little to pull buyers of any sexual orientation into dealerships. A recent survey (unveiled here) points to the fact that conservative truck buyers still hold it against GM for taking billions of taxpayer dollars as it went through an Obama-orchestrated bankruptcy process that favored political allies over other groups.

It is also very likely that the heavily subsidized and much-hyped Volt does not sit well with tax-paying, truck-driving consumers who prefer not to have their tax dollars go to wealthy purchasers of Obama's favorite vehicle; regardless of what sexual preference the subsidy recipient has. The fact that GM once blamed conservatives for the Volt's failure does not help matters. GM continued making political statements that irked conservatives by criticizing Mitt Romney during the 2012 presidential election campaign at the same time that its UAW members were coming out in force to help President Obama win reelection.

GM's flip-flop from gay appeasement to pandering to conservatives with the new rugged and heterosexual truck ad could have been expected from a company that has roots in the political arena. The company's explanations for the poor sales performance of its new truck lineup could have been scripted by a White House spokesperson. The lame excuse that supply for the new trucks could not keep up with demand could only be believed by the most gullible or uninformed voter; I mean consumer. Unlike the heroic "strong" truck driver, who is described in the ad as "somebody you can trust," GM management has lost credibility by giving inaccurate explanations for sales shortfalls in the past when it used the same "supply can't keep up with demand" excuse for the Volt.

The above-mentioned survey proves that the GM boycott is alive and well. This can also be evidenced by comments that were posted on a conservative website which posted a copy of the NLPC piece. Over 100 comments confirmed that many consumers will still not consider a GM product because of the bailout overhang and the seemingly politically-motivated, taxpayer-supported Chevy Volt. I'm sure that there are thousands more who feel that way and I personally know many individuals who say they will steer clear of any GM products.

It does not take all that many disgruntled consumers to negatively impact GM. In a very competitive environment, GM will have to make up for lost sales by offering additional incentives ( as recently added) to those truck buyers who are more open-minded to the thought of buying a bailed-out manufacturer's vehicle. The company should be able to drive truck sales, but it will come at a cost. GM can then move on to thinking about making up with its gay base of consumers who may have been insulted by the latest truck ad. Maybe the fumbling, Obama-appointed management will offer up a new rainbow-colored truck to make amends.

Mark Modica is an NLPC Associate Fellow.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: advertising; bailout; chevyvolt; conservatives; gm; governmentmoters; trucks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: jazusamo

To be honest, I would buy a GM truck. Before I’d buy a Dodge.

But the only trucks on my shoping list are Fords or the Tundra.


21 posted on 10/17/2013 11:24:56 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

exactly

bail-outs are horrible and they distort the market even more


22 posted on 10/17/2013 11:25:13 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Aren’t those made in TX?


23 posted on 10/17/2013 11:26:48 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Huskrrrr

my dad, too, same circumstances as yours. he went from big buicks, thge ones with the dynaride, that they don’t make anymore, to larger nissan cars.


24 posted on 10/17/2013 11:26:57 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

If GM were the last car company on earth, I’d buy a horse.


25 posted on 10/17/2013 11:28:24 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

Hell if Gm were the last car company on earth I would saddle my dog.


26 posted on 10/17/2013 11:29:38 AM PDT by jimpick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
GM is dead to me, and I was a Chevy Man from the beginning.

Now we drive a Ford F150 and I have a used 2002 Volvo.

27 posted on 10/17/2013 11:31:59 AM PDT by Redleg Duke ("Madison, Wisconsin is 30 square miles surrounded by reality.", L. S. Dryfus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Hard earned American tax dollars went to bail out both GM and Chrysler and they took some of that money and built assembly plants in Mexico. I will resort to horses or bicycles before I ever buy either of those brands of vehicle.
28 posted on 10/17/2013 11:32:06 AM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
Yup--In San Antonio.

By Americans.

29 posted on 10/17/2013 11:33:54 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
I'm actually buying a minivan tonight and never for a minute even considered looking at a Government Motors product.

They are a bloodsucking drain on our country's economy, and represent the model for the growing government/corporate leftwing fascist trend.

I'm more likely to buy nipple clamps.

30 posted on 10/17/2013 11:43:21 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

The whole bankruptcy and bailout was a pathetic rip off of taxpayers, bondholders and many dealers to reward bad management at the companies and the UAW. Ford told the government to take a hike and straightened themselves out.

GM is still being run by 0bama’s hand picked CEO, I say screw ‘em.


31 posted on 10/17/2013 11:51:54 AM PDT by jazusamo ([Obama] A Truly Great Phony -- Thomas Sowell http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3058949/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

what’s GM, I am sure you have heard it before, GMC = Gigantic Mountain (of) Crap.


32 posted on 10/17/2013 11:58:28 AM PDT by 1stIowa ( GMC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Huskrrrr

GM lost me when they defaulted on their bonds and conspired with Obama to rip off bondholders.

I will never buy a GM product. I don’t deal in stolen goods.


33 posted on 10/17/2013 11:58:32 AM PDT by Skepolitic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

On top of all that.........their new pickups are U.G.L.Y. Now, granted, their previous body style was ugly too but this new one raised the stakes in the ugly game.


34 posted on 10/17/2013 11:59:11 AM PDT by FAA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: FAA

>> “granted, their previous body style was ugly too but this new one raised the stakes in the ugly game.” <<

.
Kind of reminiscent of 1950 Studebaker pickups, but without the durability.


35 posted on 10/17/2013 12:04:43 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

FUGM


36 posted on 10/17/2013 12:05:20 PM PDT by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Government Motors is dead to me. Screw your bond holders, screw you.


37 posted on 10/17/2013 12:06:37 PM PDT by VRWC For Truth (Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

4 Suburbans over the last 24 years.... next family ride= Toyota.

if they gave me a Suburban, I’d trade it in for Toyota, Nissan or Ford... I’ll never own a GM/quisling/union sucking/POS supporting auto. I’d rather walk.


38 posted on 10/17/2013 12:15:37 PM PDT by Dick Vomer (democrats are like flies, whatever they don't eat they sh#t on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWC For Truth
Screw your bond holders, screw you.

That was the topping on a mountain of crap that tore it for me too.
All I could think of was Mussolini and collaborators at that point.

39 posted on 10/17/2013 12:25:11 PM PDT by TigersEye (Stupid is a Progressive disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
My 2003 GMC Envoy Denali with 67,000 miles is the LAST GM product I will ever buy, and that is entirely due to the Government Bailouts and preferential treatment of Unions over bondholders and ultimately, GM customers.

I say that as a lifelong GM customer who suffered through some really crappy cars of the late 70's, entire 80's and through the 90's. GM won't get a single cent out of me, period. Neither will Chrysler - for the same reasons.

I will ONLY look at Ford, Toyota and Honda going forward.

40 posted on 10/17/2013 12:41:34 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson