Team Arpaio: We Have Two 1961 Hawaiian Birth Certificates That List Negro Not African

Mike Zullo ^ | 6-20-2013

[Cold Case Posse Supporter]

Sheriff Arpaio's lead investigator Mike Zullo just concluded a new interview this afternoon at 3:30pm central time and revealed that he will get Congressional movement on Obama's fraudulent documents after their summer break. He also revealed that they have in possession two Hawaiian birth certificates from 1961 that reveal that the term 'Negro' was used for black babies instead of the term 'African'.

[Jeff Winston]

In other words, you can’t name and demonstrate one single fabrication I’ve ever produced.

All you can do is impotently accuse me of unspecified “fabrications” and call names.

Thank you for playing.

Jerk.

[GBA]

Satan aways eats his own.

No doubt about it. "Winston" and the rest clearly wear the Beast's mark proudly, which might have gotten them something in the short term, but it's really poor long term planning.

For what it's worth:

These six things the Lord hate, yea, his soul abhorreth seven:
Haughty eyes
A lying tongue
Hands that shed innocent blood
A heart that imagineth wicked enterprises
Feet that be swift in running to mischief
A false witness that speaketh lies
and him that raiseth up contentions among brethren.
--Proverbs 6:16

Pretty much covers all of their posting here.

[MHGinTN]

You did it again! ;^) Thanks for illustrating your juvenile alinskeyesque techniques.

[Yosemitest]

Well said.

[little jeremiah]

His anxiety is shown by his increasing use of ALL CAPS. As though that makes his nonsense less nonsensical.

[little jeremiah]

His purpose is to (a) support Zero and (b) maybe even rake in some $ from his book.

[Fred Nerks]

So where are we at so far as a result of various comments? Stanley Ann Dunham was unconscious when the birth information was being entered; (although the document is a forgery) the pencilled numbers classification changed after the birth of the child named on the document on which the birthdate is August 4, 1961, (although that isn’t zero’s birthdate, it’s the birthdate of Virginia Sunhara,) and the birth name belongs to the child of Ann/Anna and the kenyan student, who was born in January 1961.
But wait! There’s more. He was born in Kenya! Because the Daily Pen found the name Obama in a UK archive that showed a birth in 1961 (Kezia had two sons the family won’t acknowledge) and it’s a proven fact that Stanley Armour wasn’t a racist because he apparently showed up at a welcome for someone wearing numerous lei - so placed with a head that doesn’t belong to him, that his arms are long enough to belong to an ape...and the only coloured people in the image are the crew of a ship...but not being a racist, Stanley Armour allows himself to be photographed in their presence anyway.
I guess that goes to show he and Frank Marshall Davis were close friends, even though there’s never been any evidence they were.
There are some people on this thread who have a bad case of someone pee’d in their corn-flakes, and some who really aren’t interested in anything but creating dissent.
I tried to post some stuff that might be helpful, might add some food for thought, but I’m a drama queen.

Result? PROGRESS ZERO.

[little jeremiah]

Actually, despite everything that you noted (and I agree with your assessment), I don’t think the results is no progress. Why? Beacuse more people read than comment, and when rational comments are attacked, rational people often refrain from making such comments, they just read. And very likely that is exactly what some of the posters’ purpose is - to shut up those who are just looking for facts, to drive them away. But all that does is keep people just reading, doens’t drive them away, just makes them not post comments.

A rational person reading this thread, with a sincered desire to ascertain truth, will decide rightly which comments are useful and which are not.

The truth stands on its own - it has a different ring, so to speak. Like a cracked bell or one made from inferior materials rings poorly, and a sound bell made of good brass rings clearly.

People with agendas other than “Hey! Let’s find out who this Zero really is”! are easy to identify.

[Fred Nerks]

...People with agendas other than “Hey! Let’s find out who this Zero really is”! are easy to identify.

True. Thanks for the reminder....

[WildHighlander57]

Sounds like the good Lord is talking about 0.

[Fred Nerks]

According to a biographical history of the Obama family, written by Peter Firstbrook, The Obamas: The Untold Story of an African Family (2010), BHO Sr.’s good friend Leo Odera said that BHO Sr. learned, while studying in Hawaii, that back in Kenya his wife Kezia was seen “out and about,” dancing in nightclubs, in the company of other men (page 207). Up to that point, BHO Sr. had remained in touch with his wife and children, via letters; but when he learned from friends in Kenya that Kezia was stepping out, he became, shall we say, disenchanted. He eventually stopped corresponding with his wife altogether when he learned through friends that she was pregnant by another man. He wrote to Odera:

She has disappointed me because she is expecting another child.

[Jeff Winston]

You did it again! ;^) Thanks for illustrating your juvenile alinskeyesque techniques.

YOU'RE the Alinskyite, jerk.

Anyone posts the truth, based on the EVIDENCE, and you accuse them of being "alinskeyesque," a "troll," an "Obot," a "shill," and all kinds of other things.

You're despicable. You do not deserve to call yourself a conservative, since you clearly don't give a crap about conservative values.

[GBA]

Thank you! That was priceless.

[MHGinTN]

LOL!

[MHGinTN]

You even have a fan club, Jeffie. How quaint.

[4Zoltan]

“That report uses classifications that are not reflected by the alleged coding manual.”

From the 1961 Natality Report,

“Births in the United States in 1961 are classified for
vital statistics into white, Negro, American Indian, Chinese, Japanese, Aleut, Eskimo, Hawaiian and Part-Hawaiian
(combined), and “other nonwhite.”

Page 5-7

http://www.nber.org/vital-stats-books/vsus_1961_1.pdf

Table from the Coding and Punching Geographic and Personal Particulars for Births Occurring in 1961

White (includes Mexican, Puerto Rican, and all other Caucasian) -———————1
Negro ——————————2
Indian (includes American and Alaskan Indians) -—3
Chinese —————————4
Japanese—————————5
Aleut-——————————6
Eskimo-—————————7
Filipino—————————8
Other nonwhite——————9
Hawaiian-————————0
Part-Hawaiian-——————V

http://myveryownpointofview.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/coding-and-punching-geographic-and-personal-particulars-for-births-occurring-in-1961.pdf

From the Division of Data Processing, Vital Statistics Programming Branch, Tape File Information, 1960-1961 Natality Tape Files for the United States

Race of Child
1…...White
2…...Negro
3…...Indian
4…...Chinese
5…...Japanese
6…...Aleut
7…...Eskimo
8…...Filipino
9…...Other nonwhite
0......Hawaiian
V… . Part Hawaiian

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/FOIA-DHHS-11-00673.pdf

On all of the manuals and the annual report there is no entry for “not stated”.

In the annual report it says - “In 1961 there were 4,268,326 live births registered in the United States representing an increase of less than 1 percent over the number of births in 1960.” page 1-3

Obviously, this statement could only be made after December 31, 1961.

[Fred Nerks]

So regardless of the manual date, if the kenyan had a son in Hawaii and insisted on his race being entered as AFRICAN, he would end up being classified as 9.

OTHER NON WHITE.

Why? Might that be because his race was simply NOT STATED?

[GBA]

Are you kidding? That was seriously funny. Other than the poster who wrote it, how could anyone not appreciate that level of humor? Priceless.

[ForAmerica]

What state? I wonder if different states used different terminology; IIRC from other discussions about this, standard terms were used.

Texas, I'm not sure. But African is not standard terms, I can see colored perhaps.

[Fred Nerks]

OTHER NON WHITE APPEARS TO BE A STANDARD TERM