Posted on 05/14/2013 4:47:36 PM PDT by wtd
THIS COULD BE HUGE: What did the briefings Romney received say about Benghazi?
After he got the GOP nomination, Romney was SUPPOSED to be getting PRESIDENTIAL briefings on national security.
BUT HE DID NOT GET THEM UNTIL AFTER THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION SANITIZED THE BENGHAZI ATTACK (from a Google news feed word-search):
(Excerpt) Read more at astuteblogger.blogspot.com ...
From the ass toot blogger?
In before the Humblegunner snark.
The briefing does not matter when it comes to Romney.
If he heard the truth, being a RINO-E he would not have done anything at all. He was too busy playing “nice guy” and going along to get along.
The story is not worth the ink it is written in.
Romney campaign nixed a Benghazi ad that the RNC waned to run. Big dose of fail.
Eat your peas.
Maybe he nixed it because he believed that the national security briefings sent to him were factual....
Paul Ryan a member of congress got the same briefing.He can testify before the committee and reveal what was said.
Uh...Never thought about it from this direction. Someone has been using their tinfoil hat!!
Interesting! Verrrrrrrrrrry interesting!
“Good question ...This COULD BE HUGE!”
Hugh and series! Maybe Mitt could answer this question.
.
.
- “Obama-Rigged” :
- Romney was only given the final “sanitized talking points” Obamatized (12th) version -
.
.
Better be careful, the FR police will be after you. The correct phrasing, per FR Standards is:
"Good question ... This could be HUGH AND SERIES!" ;)
The other shoe to drop?
Moose - sister, yea, whatever.
Geez, we don’t even TRY anymore?
Willard couldnt care less...
Our national security has never been a concern of his...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.