Posted on 02/15/2013 9:09:12 AM PST by Oldpuppymax
Today, February 15, 2013, Attorney Orly Taitz brings her request to move the Obama eligibility challenge from conference to the oral hearing stage at the US Supreme Court. She is moving forward in spite of the fact that four African-American Supreme Court clerks refused to allow Taitz to see the signature of Justice Anthony Kennedy who denied her petition originally. “But I resubmitted to Justice Roberts, and he sent it to the conference,” Taitz said. (1)
The California attorney is asking “…how do we know that he (Kennedy) ever saw the brief?” In no uncertain terms clerk James Baldin told me that “I (Taitz) [was] not allowed to see the signature.” This denial of her right to see Kennedy’s signature “does not make any sense.” Perhaps her...
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
Why has ROBERTS, and not some other judge, put this case in conference? What is going ON in this court?
The only branch of the Federal Government with the power and authority to remove a sitting President for crimes, per the U.S.Constitution, is the legislative branch - Congress.
The power and authority to remove a usurper via Quo warranto was delegated, by Congress, to the District Court, Washington, D.C.
Even worse. Before and after the flight takes off, the pilot is seen on the body of the plane tearing apart its engine, the stewards, FAA, and company owner all swear that it doesn’t matter whether the pilot is really a pilot and not a hijacker, and the passengers all say, “OK” and go back to watching the in-flight film. The media (and some Freepers) attack those who point out the sabotage underway. When law enforcement points out the sabotage underway they are also attacked.
Surreal times.
Watching Hillary pull off that ‘actress of the year’ stunt REALLY REALLY REALLY TICKED ME OFF, because it was a clear sign that she was attempting to beat back further probing of team 0bama’s COVER-UP or downplaying of the attack so as to shield 0bama from damage to his re-election.. 0bama pulled the SAME stunt with Romney in the debate where he feigned anger because of Romney’s ‘act of terror’ challenge. The same psychology was in play here, compliments of Axelrod or Jarrett. How they let Hillary just walk away after her dramatic play act is beyond me.
Thomas already admitted they were “evading” the issue.
That was the intent of their alinsky tactics here at freerepublic.
They were quite successful.
Of course, having the admin mods in their corner was also helpful.
Ha! They say: “Well, actually he isn’t a pilot, but he’s REALLY, REALLY cool and it says on his resume that he’s real smart!”
Only, in this case, you asked prior to even boarding the plane.
Others joined in and asked as the plane was taxiing to the runway and yet more joined in asking for verification prior to takeoff.
The crew informed each asking, that their questions were frivolous and that they had no right in asking those questions to begin with. Some were even told that they would not receive the complimentary in-flight snack/beverages as a penalty for daring to ask such a question.
Even if they do evade the issue today, it would be kinda nice to set up a protocol for reasonable consideration in the future - literally every court has declared that all candidates, voters, citizens have no standing to contest any of the constitutional eligibility restrictions... and that’s just ridiculous. It’s hardly an unreasonable request.
“.....The power and authority to remove a usurper via Quo warranto was delegated, by Congress, to the District Court, Washington, D.C.......”
Anybody try a quo warranto method yet?
I don’t want a President Biden but Obama was never legally qualified to hold the office of President because he was not Natural Born. His father was a citizen of Kenya at the time of his birth.
“She is moving forward in spite of the fact that four African-American Supreme Court clerks refused to allow Taitz to see the signature of Justice Anthony Kennedy who denied her petition originally.”
“When school students touring the buildings came up to the Taitz group to ask questions, their teacher was said to have made them leave! (2)”
Two extremely relevant factors in the case against Obama and leaves many questions unanswered.
Who were the for African American clerks who denied Taitz her constitute all right to see Justice Kennedy’s signature and what were they wearing that day?
And who exactly was this school teacher who told her students to leave when the students began to ask questions?
Was it really a school teacher and were the others really students? Could it be that the teacher was really a member of the Trilateral Commission and just perhaps the students were North Korean avatars?
I don’t know.
That looks like an Obama double. LOL
He wouldn’t need to use fake docs if the info on them was correct....
Orly Taitz tried Quo Warranto in 2010 (Taitz v Obama). It was dismissed.
Montgomery Blair Sibley has another Quo Warranto suit also being heard in conference at SCOTUS today. It also was dismissed by the lower courts and by the SCOTUS in a previous incarnation. (ex-rel. Sibley v Obama).
http://www.scribd.com/doc/80165956/EX-REL-SIBLEY-v-OBAMA-USDC-D-C-First-Amended-Certified-Petition-for-Writs-Quo-Warranto-Etc
Not a surprising comment coming from you, Drew. Interesting how you have no respect for the birther movement yet you post on the birther threads regularly. Most people just ignore what they consider idiocy and move along. I often wonder what might be your motivation....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.