Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Seattle Homemaker Fined $13,000 For Doing Background Check On Obama
January 28, 2013 | Linda Jordan

Posted on 01/28/2013 11:33:35 AM PST by ethical

On January 10, 2013 the Washington State Supreme Court fined Linda Jordan almost $13,000 because she legally challenged Barack Obama's use of forged identity documents: A fake birth certificate and phony Social Security Number.

Jordan wanted the original records to be produced for comparison. Why did Jordan want to see Obama’s real ID?

• The Maricopa County Sheriff Department has presented credible evidence that the birth certificate Barack Obama posted on the White House website on April 27, 2011 was forged. (Maricopa County Sheriff Department 602.876.1801) • Jordan’s own research confirmed that Hawaii law requires signatures on birth certificates to be in permanent ink. The signature of Obama’s mother, on his purported 1961 birth certificate, is partly ink and partly a computer created signature. This compilation means the signature was forged. • Ohio Private Investigator Susan Daniels has confirmed that the Social Security Number Obama is using was previously issued to someone else. SSN’s are NEVER re-issued.

Obama used this fake ID to prove he was eligible to be President. It got him on the ballot and into the White House. This is fraud in the least, treason at worst.

“I filed the lawsuit because I fear for America’s future. A serious crime has been committed right in front of us and federal agents turned a blind eye to it. There is substantial evidence that Barack Obama is using fraudulent identity documents. The court ignored this evidence and sanctioned me with almost $13,000 in fines for exercising my right to request an evidentiary hearing. They labeled my concerns "frivolous". Surely Americans have the right to confirm if Obama used fake ID to gain access to the White House.” Linda Jordan

http://www.obamaforgeries.com


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birtherpunishment; birthers; everify; forgery; naturalborncitizen; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 421 next last
To: butterdezillion

Sorry, I have no idea how any plaintiffs’ or defense attorney was selected for any Obama eligibility case.
I wasn’t aware of judges spending any time looking at piles of dead bodies unless photos of those bodies are proffered as evidence. Judges rule on what is before them.


281 posted on 02/02/2013 3:29:25 PM PST by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: Nero Germanicus

He was denied standing. Other candidates supposedly lose nothing by having a cheater in the race. (gag)

It’s a moving target. If McCain had challenged Obama they would have said it was too early or too late to do so. They can make up excuses until the cows come home - because, as Justice Thomas said, THEY ARE EVADING THIS ISSUE. That means they could take it on and resolve it but they are instead finding ways to not have to.

Why are they evading it? You tell me.


282 posted on 02/02/2013 3:35:48 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: Nero Germanicus

Oh, that’s right. The dead bodies have to be on Twitter before the judge will let them decide the legal case for him....

I forgot we were playing by Iranian rules.


283 posted on 02/02/2013 3:38:06 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Judge Carter said in his order that he strongly considered granting standing to Alan Keyes but he didn’t because Keyes was only on the ballot in three states and therefore had no real chance to win.
Hint, hint: McCain, Romney, Palin and Ryan were on the ballot in 50 states and the District of Columbia and they accumulated Electoral votes.


284 posted on 02/02/2013 6:21:26 PM PST by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: Nero Germanicus

Never mind that for a third party the percentage of the vote that you get determines whether you can be on the ballot the next time. At least in some places. And determines whether you’re one who is able to make it into presidential debates so you get visibility. And...

But like I said, supposedly a competitor suffers no harm by a cheater being in the race. Heck, what’s the big deal about Lance Armstrong or any of the others who used steroids? Nobody was hurt by having a cheater in the race. As long as 2nd place didn’t sue Armstrong, what business is it of anybody else’s whether he was cheating? Right?

How can Congress butt its nose into steroid use when they haven’t suffered any particularized harm - when NOBODY who might have suffered particularized harm actually sued in court? Heck, for that matter, who suffered particularized harm from Al Capone’s tax evasion? Who would have had to pay a “significant” amount more in taxes in order to make up for what Capone didn’t pay? That cost would have been spread out over a bunch of people and what’s the big deal if a person only has to pay pennies more? That’s not enough to make a difference. CLEARLY nobody was harmed by Al Capone’s tax evasion. It was a victimless crime so what’s the point of prosecuting it?

Etc ad nauseum. A lawyer can always find an excuse. Everything is excusable if you couch it in the right terms. That’s why justice doesn’t exist, and the law is utterly and absolutely meaningless.

If Carter hadn’t used that excuse he’d have found another.


285 posted on 02/02/2013 7:00:32 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

“Bill Gwatney and Stephanie Tubbs died suddenly shortly after saying they would file a petition at the DNC Convention challenging Obama’s eligibility.”

Do you have a link to these statements by Gwatney and Tubbs? Or is this just something someone said they said?

“I believe we’ve now got affidavits from Hillary insiders who heard Bill Clinton say that he knows Obama is not eligible, and the higher ups said the plan had always been to challenge it at the DNC Convention.”

Please link these affidavits. I do not believe they exist.

“the Soros goons had to threaten to kill Chelsea - according to what top sources told Bettina Viviano.”

So let me get this straight, after theatening their daughter’s life Hillary went to work for the Obama Administrtion. And Bill waited for the 2012 Democratic Convention to give what may have been one of the best Convention speeched in history, a speech that some say saved the Obama Presidency and then for good measure went out and tirelessly campaigned from Obama. Something dos add up.


286 posted on 02/02/2013 7:01:33 PM PST by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: 4Zoltan

People do strange things when a gun is held to their daughter’s head. Know what I mean?

Here are a couple links. The story says Viviano’s sources were willing to come forward with affidavits but if they’ve been signed, they’ve not been made public, but that’s to be expected since there haven’t been any charges filed by the posse yet. I have signed an affidavit on my own that has not been made public yet, and I’m prepared to sign one for Zullo if/when there’s a case to submit it for.

http://www.wnd.com/2012/04/sheriff-joe-expands-obama-probe-to-hillary-supporters/

http://www.wnd.com/2012/04/hillary-supporters-untold-obama-horror-stories/

That first link mentions that the posse found evidence of threats to the media.

Here’s a post I posted to somebody else recently. It’s got more links:

ere are some FR posts about it. I think they have links. I think I posted something on my blog that had links also; I’ll check. But in the meantime here’s a start:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2885338/posts?page=15#15

More links at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2873887/posts?page=62

If you want to know more about the package Rush Limbaugh received I could look for that, and there is also a bunch about Breitbart’s death.

The whole idea of threats against people who would challenge or even bring up Obama’s eligibility is reinforced by the claims of the Hillary supporters. 2008 was literally a coup. I have insider information that the reason Hagmann went quiet on his story of the media threats is because one of his informants was killed and he wanted to protect a particularly vulnerable informant (which is the one I asked Zullo about, which fled the country in fear after all). Hagmann did allow another investigator/reporter to look at his evidence with the condition that no confidentiality was to be violated through public reporting. That colleague reported on Glenn Beck leaving Fox because of threats. I think that’s in the links I gave on one of the FR posts; if not I can look it up for you, let me know.

Here’s some stuff about the Hillary supporters’ claims of threats and murders regarding Obama’s eligibility problem:

Two posts, one by Ladysforest (at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2885916/posts?page=134#134 ) and one by me (at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2885916/posts?page=140#140 which tie the suspicious circumstances of Lori Starfelt’s reported death with what has been reported by Bettina Viviano and Michele Thomas about how Bill and Hillary Clinton were scared out of their plans to challenge Obama’s eligibility at the Denver Convention after good Clinton friend (and Arkansas Democratic Party Chairman) Bill Gwatney was shot to death and Stephanie Tubbs died of a supposed aneurysm after each in turn had agreed to present the challenge at the convention – both deaths occurring within a couple weeks of the convention. Some links about that – WND interview of Michele Thomas http://www.wnd.com/2012/04/hillary-supporters-untold-obama-horror-stories/

Bettina Viviano interview and more about 2008 primary: http://www.politijim.com/2012/03/did-obama-assassinate-clinton-delegates.html

This last link alludes to some pages from a site we can’t link to here on FR, but if you look at the THREATS AND POTENTIAL THREATS TO HILLARY SUPPORTERS IN 2008 part at http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2012/05/21/important-updates/ you can see those links and follow part of the coup within the democratic party itself - including the suspicious death (and non-investigation) of Kam Kuwata, the organizer of the 2008 Dem Convention who observed an Obama drug- or trance-induced meltdown shortly before his speech. Intricate details but fascinating to see how Obama screwed even the democrats in order to accomplish his coup.

This should keep you busy for a while. (This is why I usually post summaries. lol)


287 posted on 02/02/2013 7:20:36 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: 4Zoltan

I should make a correction though. I think it was in the interview with Viviano that she said she had been told by high-ups in Hillary’s campaign that Hillary’s plan had always been to challenge Obama’s eligibility at the convention. But the gal who got Tubbs and Gwatney to say that they would present a petition at the convention said the petition itself was to keep Obama from getting enough votes in the first round so they would have to go to a second round and from there could build momentum. So the intention and the strategy for achieving the goal may be 2 different things. But Gwatney’s supposedly-random death the day after he agreed to present the petition is a bit too coincidental, especially followed by Tubbs’ death shortly after SHE agreed to present the petition.

Something that is important to remember: the fact of threats to the media personalities if they reported on eligibility has been confirmed by law enforcement. So we KNOW that threats have been used to keep the eligibility issue quiet (initially), and it seems likely that threats were reiterated to get media personalities to ridicule the eligibility issues when they could no longer be avoided.

And we saw the same thing happen on a smaller level right in front of our faces, with the Kansas ballot objection. The objector withdrew his objection because his family received threats once the media got on the bandwagon and ridiculed both Kobach and this objector.

So we know that threats have had a BIG role in trying to silence the eligibility issue.

The Fogbowers have laughed about people posing as supporters of Orly in order to encourage her to unfruitful distractions. These fine, upstanding people (cough) claimed to have created a forged Kenyan birth certificate and specifically presented it so that it would be put forward in a court of law as evidence. Why would anybody waste their time on these efforts - even potentially illegal efforts - if they truly believed there was nothing to fear in these challenges? Either these are flat-out evil people just looking to make trouble, or they are scared of the truth being found out, or both.

I had a poster with the handle “Dr Who” who admitted to me that he/she helped forge Obama’s birth certificate and said that the FBI knew they had done it and would cover for them. I thought it was probably just somebody trying to demoralize me into giving up, until the very capable hacker who dug into it for me had his computer fried by a tripwire set up to fry anybody who started to untangle the “gates” that had been used and find out where this person was really at. That’s a bit of overkill for somebody with nothing to hide.

There is a dark, seamy underside to this whole issue. Always has been. And those things fit what Ret Col Lawrence Sellin overheard a Republican Presidential primary candidate give as the reason nobody would address Obama’s eligibility issue: it goes way, way too deep for anybody to be willing to open it up. And seeing the flames from the depths of Hell directed towards anybody who MIGHT try to bring it up supports that view. You don’t kill people over something that a $10 birth certificate could instantly clear up.


288 posted on 02/02/2013 7:52:26 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

The night watchman does drop off a bookmark.
The whales have blown off and submerged.


289 posted on 02/03/2013 1:22:04 AM PST by moose07 (the truth will out ,one day. liberals and logic: Never confuse the two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

“So we KNOW that threats have been used to keep the eligibility issue quiet (initially), and it seems likely that threats were reiterated to get media personalities to ridicule the eligibility issues when they could no longer be avoided.”
__

Amazing, isn’t it? Not to mention all the Republican members of Congress! Somehow, they are brave enough to oppose Obamacare and immigration reform and gun legislation. They’ll hold hearings galore on Benghazi and Fast & Furious and even the Iraq surge. But not a one of them has initiated a single hearing on eligibility, even though it would give them the subpoena power that the birthers so desperately want.

Those threaty people are doing on hell of a job, don’t you think? Even Justice Thomas, a mind-reader tells me, secretly agrees with the birthers. And Scalia and Alito, too, while we’re at it.

George Soros must have threatened all their families.


290 posted on 02/03/2013 7:59:28 AM PST by BigGuy22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: BigGuy22

Soros needs a superficial show of opposition, to keep everybody thinking things are like normal.

But when push comes to shove, Obama gets whatever he wants from Congress. Haven’t you noticed that? What has stopped Obama on anything - like gun control - is the polls showing that he will lose everybody if he tries pushing that now. Sandy Hook wasn’t strong enough; there’s too much pushback from the public. It’s not Congress that has EVER stopped Obama.

Even when it was a lame-duck dem House after the 2010 landslide - the R’s gave away Don’t Ask Don’t Tell AND our missile defense system when they could have just waited for the new term and defeated it all. Why did the R’s cave? Because Soros knew he better start wiping out the military and our defenses, in time for the final push of the full coup (when it is openly acknowledged that this is no longer America). He gave his orders, and the R’s did as they were told, even though there was no political reason for them to do so.

IOW, what everybody here (and some other places) is able to observe contradicts what you are saying and actually makes my case for me.

I should clarify, though. I don’t believe that all the members of Congress have had threats against their families. Most of them fear media ridicule, so threatening all the media (and killing a couple to make sure to scare them all) was enough to control most of the Congress-critters, and the rest can be controlled by Boehner and McConnell, who I believe WERE threatened in the meeting the day after McCain suspended his campaign and Bush gave his speech. They’ve been keeping in line any R’s who might consider “going rogue”. That’s what the stripping of the committee memberships were all about this past month.

Remember that one of the Republican presidential primary candidates said nobody will touch the eligibility issue (meaning Congress, the courts, media, etc - the ones who would be expected to address it) because they KNOW it goes too deep. IOW, there’s more to the story than just eligibility, and everybody in DC knows it. How do they know it? You tell me; I’ve already said what I believe, and given just a few of my supporting reasons. If I gave it all, nobody would have the attention span to hear it all.


291 posted on 02/03/2013 10:14:00 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
Here's the problem I have with Bettina Viviano. In her first interview with with Canada Free Press, she never mentions any of the threat stuff.

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/42552

Here is here Amazon profile:

http://www.amazon.com/gp/pdp/profile/A9SVYYPNQV2NK/ref=cm_cr_rdp_pdp/191-9510859-2499136

Note her screen name - BettySueLA

And her she is under that name with comments on Obama from four years ago (before the 2008 election):

http://www.youtube.com/all_comments?v=B-aGU65lAnU

"But what's disgusting? Look at all of these uneducated idiots who believe the lies of Obama and CNN? Obama and Ayers are very close friends. That's a fact. Obama and Ayers go back to Obama's days at Columbia in NYC. Long term friends who share a HATRED of AMERICA. Wake up you idiots voting for Obama. He's everything bad Palin and the rest of the decent people in this country have discovered. Don't vote if you don't know what the F you are doing you idiots."

http://www.youtube.com/all_comments?threaded=1&v=I3IAjphhw6E

"Winthorpe is a paid Obama Cockroach who blogs and lies for OHitler. Don't listen to his shit. They are obviously scared at Camp Cockroach because McCain has this in the bag, as he should. Gee, let me think...I can vote for a LIAR, AMERICA HATING CRIMINAL, CHEAT, THIEF, DIRTBAG and his sleazy OBiden...OR, I can vote for two PATRIOTS with EXPERIENCE who LOVE AMERICA and will dedicate their lives to working for the PEOPLE. It's a really EASY choice for anyone with a brain not on welfare."

And after the election:

http://uspatriots.yuku.com/topic/65/Obama-39-s-Plans-for-Children-0-to-5-years-old

"This stuff is repgunant. My mother would go to jail before she would ever let someone pull this CRAP on me. I hate Fraudbama. I really do. He thinks he's HITLER for God's sake and Americans are too damned ignorant to see that this stuff is FREAKY, out of line, Anti-American, and just plain WRONG. If I ever have a kid, Fraudbama can kiss my ass before he starts these Nazi boot camps and indoctrination programs. Who the hell does this freak think he is? Oh, yeah, HITLER. "

http://dailytrojan.com/2010/10/15/obama-to-visit-campus-speak-at-public-rally/

"I am a USC Alum and spent the last two years making a documentary film about Obama and his criminal pals in the DNC. These people are corrupt, criminals who belong in Federal Prison, and Obama should be impeached. Period. I am stunned that anyone at USC would be ignorant enough to support this fraud who has destroyed our country. Shame on you if you attend this BS rally, and support this Anti-American twit. I thought we were all smarter than that. If you don’t understand what is being done to this country by Obama and his loons, then you better educate yourselves before there is nothing left for your children. The American Dream is just about dead, thanks to 4 years of Nancy Pelosi and 2 years of Obama. I can’t imagine my fellow Trojans being too dumb to “get it.” Show this loser the door and go do something constructive with your time."

If you follower her progression over time the comments become more angry. By 2010 she starts to mention threats but even then she says this about Bill and Hillary

"Bill Clinton made a veiled reference to it when someone asked him if Obama was “qualified” to be President. He said “well if he’s over 35, and a CITIZEN, then he is.” That was a direct reference to it. As for Hillary, she got a job out of it. What else could she do if she didn’t tow the line? Write a book? She would have been shunned by the party formerly known as the Democratic Party, which is now nothing but an ugly crime machine, and embarrassment to America."

http://hillbuzz.org/about-that-birth-certificate-which-obama-refuses-to-produce

BTW, here is Clinton's actual statement on Obama qualifications:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdvaxQIC1s4

292 posted on 02/03/2013 10:30:32 AM PST by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
"IOW, what everybody here (and some other places) is able to observe contradicts what you are saying and actually makes my case for me."
__

Well, Butter, with all respect, you telling me what makes your case for you is simply another example of you thinking it over and deciding that you agree with yourself. Once more you act as the judge in your own case and declare yourself the winner.

No one here doubts the strength of your convictions. In fact, my thinking has been more along the lines of LL, who asked you more than once the following intriguing question:

Did it ever occur to you that the reason every judge in America and 99.99% of all lawyers-- including prominent conservative constitutional lawyers who are challenging Obama on health care and term limits-- disagree with you is perhaps because you're wrong? Did that thought ever cross your mind for a second?

Are you willing to address that?
293 posted on 02/03/2013 10:31:31 AM PST by BigGuy22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

To: 4Zoltan

So what are you saying?

Everybody who knows what Obama has done is angry. There would be something wrong with us if we weren’t.

What’s your point?


294 posted on 02/03/2013 10:52:04 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: BigGuy22

I already addressed that. Did you read what I said?

And are you the lone person here on FR who isn’t complaining about Congress rolling over and playing dead in the face of Obama’s anti-Constitutional moves?

Try going to any thread on this forum and saying how brave the R’s are in opposing Obama and see the response you get. Once you’ve seen the response, I will rest my case on that point.

Oh, wait. You’ve never commented on any other subject here at FR. Apparently not all that interested in conservative conversation. Just interested in saying to the “rule of law” folks: “Nyeah. You lost.”


295 posted on 02/03/2013 11:00:51 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

“I already addressed that. Did you read what I said?”
__

Why don’t you point me to your answer or state it again. I’m not aware of any response that you’ve given that directly addresses his question.

Please read the question again. It’s pretty specific.


296 posted on 02/03/2013 11:17:18 AM PST by BigGuy22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: 4Zoltan

“And Bill waited for the 2012 Democratic Convention to give what may have been one of the best Convention speeched in history”

Spoken like a true liberal.


297 posted on 02/03/2013 11:24:35 AM PST by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: 4Zoltan

Chelsea Clinton was co-chair of the Obama Inauguration Committtee.


298 posted on 02/03/2013 11:47:35 AM PST by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: BigGuy22

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2982757/posts?page=278#278


299 posted on 02/03/2013 11:48:35 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Thanks, I was familiar with that one, but I’m looking for a more direct response, for your take on what LL described as “the reason every judge in America and 99.99% of all lawyers— including prominent conservative constitutional lawyers who are challenging Obama on health care and term limits— disagree with you.”

Are you saying that every judge and nearly every prominent conservative lawyer has been threatened? Or do you believe that, despite their training and experience, they are just wrong, and that as a non-lawyer you are coming up with the right answer and they’re all coming up with the wrong one?


300 posted on 02/03/2013 12:08:11 PM PST by BigGuy22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 421 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson