Posted on 01/05/2013 8:41:16 AM PST by NOBO2012
John Boehner says hes done dealing with Big Guy one-on-one.
(snip)Big Guy had already said that he "will not have another debate with this Congress over whether or not they should pay the bills that they've already racked up [for my transformation of America plan].(snip)
Mark Levin(snip)is not very happy with Big Guy, Mitchy or BooHoo Boehner(snip)would probably approve of this new approach to transparency in government:
Butt getting back to the major proposition: since its much more fun when the loyal opposition fights back, many have wondered why some of those rich old white guys on the Right dont put their money together and buy part of the government media complex in order to get in the game.
(snip)Frasier gave it a shot with the now defunct RIGHTNETWORK which,despite a brilliant Editor-In-Chief and featured articles by moi, never put enough resources into the game(snip)But where are the el Rushbos,the Koch brothers,the Donald,the Amway boys,the Marriotts? Heck,if Mitt had bought a TV network with his money and ability to raise money instead of running for president,there might be a member of the loyal opposition at the helm now. Its not too late Mitt...and Im available!(snip)
(snip)How many more sardine kissers do we need on TeeVee anyway?
Because seriously,if MSM pushes the L ( ) button for Big Guy any more frequently than they already do
theyre going to have to get a room(snip)
So what do you say?How about a Loyal Opposition Media Complex? Because somebody has to Breitbart the world...Continued
(Excerpt) Read more at michellesmirror.com ...
Yes, more would not hurt.
What Breitbart understood, and what all too many establishment Republicans and even conservatives dont, is that there is no accommodating the left, and there is no hope of receiving fair treatment from the left-dominated establishment press. The left is hellbent on fundamentally transforming the country into a socialist utopia which has never succeeded anywhere it has been tried, and the press is determined to help them do that. Folks, no matter what you do, theyre going to hate you (and hate is the right word). So you might as well do the right thing and follow your beliefs and principles (John Plan B Boehner, please note).
This country now has a government headed by the most radical president in U.S. history, one with the worst economic record since Franklin Delano Roosevelts New Deal extended the Great Depression by eight years. He nevertheless won reelection largely because his opponent conceded too much ground and wouldnt fight hard enough for what remained.
Barack Obama and the left believe they have only just begun. Sensible, Constitution-anchored conservatives need to start acting as an army of Breitbarts.
As you may have learned when you are younger, being right is not enough. If you cant convince others that you are right, will make the right choice, have the right answer or know the right course to follow you wont win the class presidency, the plum assignment or that promotion. If your ideas do not get the time of day and your values are kept like a light under a bushel, your messaging wont resonate. Especially when the rest of the government media complex is hell-bent to propagate an alternate reality.Remember: Its not what you know, its what people think you know.
Carve it on my tombstone. Right over the part that says “He died largely ignored but knowing he was right all along...and fine with it”
;)
it's our nation's future; its NOT a parlor game...we can't seem to see the forest; b/c of the trees...
To me nothing could be simpler. And I am so sick and tired of people who have to complicate everything about this.
1: Believe in something.
2: support those who support that.
Now as supposed conservatives, we should logically support conservative values. Those are not an unknown quantity.
Is Mandating HPV vaccines to kids or mandating anything of the sort conservative?
No. By no definition. So do not vote for or support that.
Is hiring known GOP operatives to tank your own campaign or attacking people to benefit a liberal conservative?
No. By no definition. So do not vote for or support that.
Is jumping on board with the MSM and Gloria Allred to scuttle a man’s campaign based on hearsy conservative?
No. By no definition. So do not vote for or support that.
Is spending months trashing a candidate whose values and policy statements with you agree with OK because she offended you with a TV show that was non-political?
Is it conservative?
No. By no definition. So do not vote for or support that.
And do NOT support in any way, anyone who does.
If we did that. If we stuck to our core conservative values and stopped making every excuse under the sun as to why our own special circumstance trumps those ‘values’ which then are not valuable at all), we’d get GOOD CANDIDATES to vote for.
But we get majority CRAP because decent people will not stand up only to be mocked and slapped around by ‘conservatives’ acting like freaking DU liberals.
That’s another truth that hurts. and FR and every other right wing site is filled with examples. Thus conservatism by extension is filled with examples.
Thus my statement is logically correct. And lots of people do not like that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.