I’m really sorry to have to keep sending this stuff out. Frustrating as can be, but I don’t know what else to do. The machine is taking over here and unless the “little people” call these members of Congress they won’t even know any of this stuff, since the media has falsely reported this issue, based on not bothering to see Bennett’s actual application for a verification. (sigh)
Anyway, if you could get the word out as much as possible, I’d greatly appreciate it. The electoral vote certification is tomorrow.
Wish we could, but every one of our members of Congress and the state legislature are Democrats. We’ve been throughly disenfranchised for years.
Clickable link to the documentation:
http://butterdezillion.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/complete-klayman-letter-to-bauer.pdf
You could also mention to your Senators and Representative that I am working with Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse and the conclusions I’ve reached regarding Onaka’s verification are confirmed by Attorney Larry Klayman and 2 other attorneys, and supported by the actions of the attorneys for the Mississippi Democratic Executive Committee, who made sure their verification request would work equally well for a non-valid record as for a valid one.
Ok but not holding my breath.
You’re wasting your time.
Biggest Fraud in the History of Mankind! ...bump.
And regarding 0bama's REAL birth date:
July 15th to August 4th is ONE WEEK?
Godloveya for all your efforts.
I contacted my congresscritters and will pray—I’m convinced praying will do more than trying to get through THEIR thick skulls.
The Electoral College has certified the marxist as winner of the 2012 presidential election.
They, all of the democRATs/socialist/progressives/liberals (sorry for being redundant), state controlled media, electors, etc. will not be embarrassed, or made fools in the public's eyes. Too much money, and power on the line. Damn the Constitution.
We are so screwed.
5.56mm
LOL, no, he did not.
Post a signed copy of the letter from the Hawaii SOS and then we’ll talk.
Btt
bump da rump
IIRC, the original PDF (actually, there IS no such thing, as PDF documents were not even in existence in 1961) had a declaration that stated something like this:
I certify that this is an ABSTRACT of information on file...
signed by Onaka (or whoever)
An “abstract” is a COLLECTION of different information. Possibly from different files.
And he was right, sounds to me. There was all these “pieces” cut and pasted from various files, in different fonts, etc.
NEVER was there a certification that all the info on the PDF came from files related to Obama. NEVER!
” - - - We need one Senator and one Representative to object to all the known-fraudulent electoral votes for Barack Obama.”
This is butter’s goal.
She has done a tremendous job to date.
Let each of us help her achieve her above stated goal.
I got commies, but I’ll ping others about it.
What does Klayman actually want? I can't decipher his legaleze, but it seems like he is ignoring the letter of verification (that the birth certificate exists in HI) and complaining that the WH copy is legally non-valid. The argument doesn't make sense.
“His refusal to verify what he was specifically asked is his confirmation that those things are NOT true.”
You aren’t very good at this game.
Even though there is a divorce decree, no one has found a marriage license for Stanley Ann Dunham and Barrack Obama Sr., so it’s likely that there were not married at the time of baby’s birth. In Hawaii “the child or children or the parents thereof may petition the department of health to issue a NEW ORIGINAL CERTIFICATE OF BIRTH”.
So it is possible that there may be more than one Obama “ORIGINAL CERTIFICATE OF BIRTH”. Is it significant that Barrack Obama could have changed his name from what was initially given to him at birth and “A NEW ORIGINAL CERTIFICATE OF BIRTH” is issued by the state of Hawaii?
When Onaka verified the information Obma’s original birth certificate was he referring to the “ORIGINAL CERTIFICATE OF BIRTH” that was issued at the time of his actual birth OR was he referring to “A NEW ORIGINAL CERTIFICATE OF BIRTH” issued by Hawaii DOH at the request of Obama or his parents to change his name? Was the surname of the child born to Stanley Ann Dunham originally Dunham or Obama? Or something else?
http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol06_Ch0321-0344/HRS0338/HRS_0338-0021.htm
§338-21 Children born to parents not married to each other.
(a) All children born to parents not married to each other, irrespective of the marriage of either natural parent to another, .......
(b) The evidence upon which the NEW ORIGINAL CERTIFICATE is made, and the SUPERSEDED ORIGINAL CERTIFICATE shall be sealed and filed and may be opened only upon order of a court of record.
(c) If the child’s natural parents marry each other and desire to change the child’s name, the child’s name may be changed and a NEW ORIGINAL CERTIFICATE OF BIRTH prepared.
WORKING DRAFT
Title
A call for ideas to challenge the eligibility of the President of the United States of America
Goal:
1.) To force a determination on the eligibility of the POTUS in a court of law with appropriate authority.
2.) To create debate and doubt about the eligibility of the POTUS at high volume internet sites.
3.) To force the MSM to cover the eligibility controversy seriously, and in depth.
Rationale:
Think Borg. ( A reference to a Star Trek theme) Using the division of labor and skills multiplies effects and creates solidarity. A scale of popular and effective ideas will usually rise to the top. All ideas are on the table, many problems are solved with creativity, openness to criticisms and unknotting language traps. Voluntarily form (fluid teams) i.e some members drop in and out of participation, to accomplish specific tasks. Leaders are temporary; great ideas will find an audience and be adopted by those who find them effective. Decentralize; Freerepublic has a vast resource of intelligent and experienced participants. Freerepublic is a voluntary and virtual corporation of free speech.
Example; (1) Are their competent editors at FR, I know I could sure use one. (2) There are a number of veterans who have invaluable experiences and a high level of competence in many areas. There are a number of scientists, academicians, accountants, teachers and lawyers at FR who’s knowledge and intellectual skills are untapped.
Feedback is essential to the governing principle of solving problems, Think NASA. doing more with less. Memes; ideas create ideas that can spread rapidly, finding those individuals who can articulate principle arguments will accelerate our goals, encourage FRiends to contribute their skills, which may not even be redly apparent to them. Many fronts can be launched simultaneously. Here is a short list of ideas; Those with graphic arts backgrounds can post specific eligibility graphics, videos, and alerts to Youtube, etc., with the intention of creating posts which go “viral”. Others can add comments to conservative websites, compile lists, create catalog resources, indexes, organize alerts, etc.
Outline for action
Needed; please submit ideas to the following list.
Problems:
Proposals:
Questions:
Criticisms:
Do not rely on someone else answering questions or making proposals
Accountability: We need the ability to count specific actions, i.e. posting at a web site, contacting a representative etc.
Strategies:
Offer Prize money to a winning Journalist, which is held in an escrow account. I know more donations, however those extra dollars can be transferred to Freerepublic as donations if no prize is awarded.
Petition Law firms to donate a small number of hours of research to specific areas of constitutional law.
Contact journalist, celebrities, talk shows, and pose questions about eligibility without ever broaching the subject.
Email alerts.
Tactics:
Inundation; When I first began to use the internet I came across the SETI site. I am not a UFO enthusiast, however I was intrigued by the tactic of increasing computer power by finding thousands of volunteers to lend their to perform search tasks.
Alinsky tactics. What is good for the goose is good for the gander. Hold liberals to their own standards, increase the contradictions, engage in dialectics.
Please add your own suggestions.