who let this idiocy get snuck out of the lunatic asylum? (Don’t they watch what goes in and out?)
All righty, then.
So he wants to drag legislators beind pick-up trucks?Black ones too?Or just whites.
He can have mine, 235 grains at a time.
There was a Time not too long ago where this would be considered TREASON, calling for the Abolition of the US Constitution was and is TREASONOUS. Furthermore it sounds to me like this writer is making “Criminal Terrorist Threats” a FELONY in EVERY STATE. Why has he not been arrested yet???
The last few seconds are priceless!
So, is he volunteering to be the one knocking on doors and doing the “prying”?
Why doesn’t he go ahead and try.
What did King Leonidas say? “Come and get them” or words which could be translated that way.
I suspect there are quite a few who hope he and his kind do try and take them.
Yet each time, he lamented, the only result was a spike in gun sales.
drew, thank you for affirming the old adage about the consequences of doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.... ;-)
Kaul is a Liberal Twit!
what a tough guy. I’m sure he plans on being right there on the front lines, kicking down doors.
Takes at least two for a gun fight and this person of interest has been
watching to many movies. After the fifth gun battle before 10am
with multiple deaths on both sides the police would reconsider their efforts.
That is enough of that, Mr. Journalist. Look, both the First and Second Amendments are pretty plain on the corresponding freedom. There aren’t any “except for” clauses. That said, there sure are plenty of restrictions considered permissible under the Second Amendment. Well, what’s good for the goose and all that. I accuse Kahl of journalistic brandishing. There should be punishment for that. There would be if it was done with a sword. Why exempt the pen? Let’s start enacting laws under the First Amendment corresponding to those under the Second and see how it goes. Oh, how they will howl. The aim (NPI), of course, is to have it all thrown out, not to restrict Freedom of Speech.
Shortly after the collapse of the Soviet Union, there was an international conference in Europe which was attended by high-ranking military officers from a number of countries.
During a break in the meetings, a group of military officers were gathered together, enjoying their refreshments and engaging in small talk.
One of the Americans asked his counter-part, a Russian general, if the Soviet Union had ever considered invading the United States during the Cold War. The Russian general laughed and said, “Oh no! You people have too many guns over there!”
he wants to murder law-abiding people, no focus on the real problem of criminals - ie the evil intent people - he believes the law-abiding are no different than the criminals.
i think the police need to arrest him for inciting hatred, and for proposing to commit mass murder of innocent citizens. and maybe they ought to confiscate any of his guns, he self-admitedly sounds very angry and unstable.
Typical Register brainless liberal. Impressive hypocrisy: Use violence as a protest against violence.
Gun control laws. Why isn’t NY State prosecuting the bimbo that bought the guns for the killer of the firemen as an accessory to murder and attempted murder? All of a sudden that one fell off the radar as soon as it was learned that it was some bimbo that got the guns for him. Where’s that rigorous enforcement of the gun laws?
Ah yes, the tolerance of the left for people with differing opinions - on display again.