Posted on 12/18/2012 12:47:32 PM PST by woofer2425
Mine goes to the range every few weeks, gets a cleaning worthy of a fine tool and otherwise sits in the corner. It's never assaulted a thing.
I only have pistols in case I need to defend my rifle.
Type alert..
I shot an assault rifle once ... but I didn’t load the “clip” to its’ full capacity.
Type alert..
Well, guess that covers typing on this damn tablet keyboard.
I haven’t been able to tolerate Gretchen for a long time. She always butts in with a know it all opinion. There is not a person out here that doesn’t feel horrible for the families of the slain. Overly dramatic presentation like Gretchen does is downright scarey.
The only one left on that show that shows an ounce of brains and stability is Steve Doocey. Gretchen needs to be replaced with a cooler head.
Brian is just a word stumbling dork. He doesn’t even read a teleprompter well.
This morning, Gretchen was acting so weird. I will be nice on my part by saying that being forced to cover and dwell on this for so many days could take a toll. That is why the 24/7 everyday coverage is unhealthy and is the likely reason they get so many copycat freaks and phone scare kooks coming out of the woodwork.
Bingo! You beat me to it. Haha good one. Let me add “Democratic political guru in sex extortion
Bob Beckel removed from Senate campaign after scandal surfaces”
And I ask, why do we have to have "The Five"? We should be satisfied with just "The Four". I know I am.
That was my point............
You’re right about her behavior. This morning, as she was beginning another CT story, she stopped and heaved a big sigh. I guess she was wondering when the wall-to-wall coverage is going to stop.
Steve Doocy seems to be pretty conservative to me. Today, when Gretchen asked why anyone needed an assault rifle, he asked her if she knew how many murders were committed with rifles. She said no, and he said that in 2011, there were 12,000 murders, only 300 of which were done using a rifle.
“When the people fear the government, that’s tyranny; when the government fears the people, that’s freedom.”-Thomas Jefferson
The 2A is about preventing tyranny from taking hold. Imagine the Founders watching us ask for the right to own a certain weapon.
The risk they run with any AWB is that there are many people out there in this nation who would rather die like a free man than live like a slave.
And it should be noted, this is the very idea the Founding Fathers had in mind.
Is she an actual carbine or did you cut her down? I noticed original carbines are going for much higher prices now (around $300 at the last show).
They have them in stock again at Wideners, but the price has gone up a bit ... a nice aszortment of Yugo M57 Tokarevs, too!
“Why does anyone need an assault weapon?”
Simple. Because the government and criminals have them.
Because I'm an American and it is my RIGHT to own an "Assault Rifle".
FWIW, the AR15 would not be an effective assault rifle. It has no selector switch that would enable it to go to full auto. You can only get one round per one trigger pull.
The M16 and other assault rifles have full auto capability.
In effect, the AR15 is nothing more than a gas-powered repeating rifle using a .223 round.
The Spencer Repeating Rifle was used in the Civil War (manual repeat, not gas powered) and was an improvement over muzzle loaders.
I’m not a gun guru, so someone feel free to correct me. Prior to being a chaplain, however, I was an enlisted man for 6 years, and I do know my way around an M16 and M60.
Well my weapon question weird. Why can’t I buy a strategic bomber, or an attack helocopter, if I have the money? Or a howitzer artillery cannon? Obviously it is absurb for an average citizen to buy such military equipment. Where does my right to bear arms stop. Does it stop simply with affordability and with what technology the government owes (nuclear, emp)? Or does it stop with actual laws?
“The tank, the B-52, the fighter-bomber, the state-controlled police and military are the weapons of dictatorship. The rifle is the weapon of democracy. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military. The hired servants of our rulers. Only the government - and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws.” (Edward Abbey, “The Right to Arms,” Abbey’s Road [New York, 1979])
Of course we all should have guns in the hands the citizens.
It was really about the types of weapons, but just why are any of them ever banned from purchase?
Thinking about it, things like fighter jets and bombers are owned by private citizens. They are just priced outside the hands of most. Surplus aircraft, tanks, and such are available on the open market with the only restriction being price.
Thats probably true. I never looked into actually buying one. I generally assumed that the U.S. government owned the technology on much of the equipment, so no one get get that stuff.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.