http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/roles.html
Full title: Barack Obama Voter Fraud 2012
Its Official: Obama Voter Fraud Reason for Reelection/growing Totalitarian Gove
Electoral College:
http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/roles.html
2012 Presidential Election:
http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/key-dates.html
This isn’t surprising. Kennedy won election by voter fraud in Chicago and also, lesser known, by Democrat poll workers in the South filling out ballots for basically illiterate blacks.
It’s so well known that it’s not even questioned.
Do we honestly think that the Democrat party is more moral now than then?
Just wondering . . . has anyone in the 97 100% dem precincts in Philadelphia come forward to say they voted for Romney? Not that anyone would give a big rat’s butt about it . . .
This conspiracy stuff reminds me of a vanity I posted here Nov 2010 goading Dems for similar conspiracy talk.
"Democrats, we all know the election is being stolen by secret special interests buying tomorrows election with unfair campaign ads. There is no other way to explain congressional Democrats steep drop in the polls. ......
So call up your friends and neighbors (as long as they are fellow Democrats) and tell them to stay home tomorrow. Your refusal to vote will send a clear and loud message You havent bought me and make sure your voice is heard."
Message to Dems : Protest the Stolen Election tomorrow, Stay Home (don't vote) to 'save our Democracy | 11/1/2010 | sickoflibs
Yep, if they stole the election in the 5 swing states (Republicans as Governor in many of them) then there is no point voting again or even caring who the nominee is. Time to jump?
Yep, treason for beating Romney. I bet not one indictment will come from this.
Bump
bflr
“By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat down, yea, we wept, when we remembered Zion.”
Voter fraud does not meet the definition of treason under the Constitution. The author should know this.
bkmk
This is my last election, Barack Obama said to Russias outgoing president Dmitry Medvedev. After my election, I have more flexibility.
Early indication that the scumbag’s “re-election” was already guaranteed come hell or high water.
Ping.
Ping Per your Request
It recently occurred to me how far down the road we are to totalitarianism. This article reminds me that we take rigged elections and voter fraud for granted. Socialist Amerika assumes our rulers should be forced upon us rather than elected. Notice the deafening silence from the GOP, that great bastion of freedom. We are becoming no different from any other third world corrupt country.
From the article: “The first is to file a treason complaint against Obama and see if you can find a grand jury in your state that will agree to pursue it.”
Why stop there? Every member of Congress - Democans and Republicrats alike - are participating in this fraud. By remaining silent, they are complicit.
Every Supervisor of Elections, every member of the political parties, every member of the media - file charges of treason against them and get the little fish to rat out the bigger ones.
And while we’re at it, any action taken in Washington is to be considered the action of an illegitimate government.
...was Mitt Romney actually America's choice, only to be denied victory due to a massive, powerful Democrat vote fraud machine --a machine that somehow neglected to retake the House or capture a 60 seat Senate majority?
If the latter is true, then shouldn't we keep nominating more guys like Romney? After all, why mess with success?
There is no question that there was MASSIVE voter fraud in the election.
The only questions remaining for me:
1) Was it enough to change the outcome of the election? One expert I trust, Michael Barone, while acknowledging fraud occurred, does not think it was enough to change the result.
2) In states where we KNOW voter fraud occurred on a large scale-—OH, PA, VA, FL, CO-—will state officials launch an official investigation? All those states except CO have GOP governors.
3) Another renowned expert on voter fraud-—John Fund-—I have yet to hear anything from him. Has he weighed in on this yet? Would be interesting to see what he has to say about this.
I'll have to admit they are getting better. For example, the first claim used to be "Obama lost every state with real voter photo ID laws". Problem was that 16 states have such laws, and Obama won many of them. Now the claim simply asserts that only 4 states have "voter ID Laws", and picks for very republican states that Obama couldn't steal if he had an army of vote-stealers. The definition of "voter id law" apparently is "law in a state Obama Lost".
It even has a few cases of actual voter fraud, noting that they had a case of a non-citizen being registered as a republican. I'm guessing that was part of the black-ops operation.....
It has these proven false accusations:
One of their actual citations for military vote suppression contained this comment:
:UPDATE: Duffel Blog link removed - satire. But read the rest.
And it contained this actual example of "supression":
CBS News: Tampa-area resident and Navy captain Peter Kehring has spent more than 30 years in the U.S. military. But due to Florida GOP Gov. Rick Scotts recent purge of voter rolls, Kehring will not be able to cast a vote on Election DayYep, that evil Obama enlisted the help of conservative Governor Rick Scott to help supress the military vote.
BTW -- it is clear the overseas military vote is abysmal, and the government is at least partly to blame (in 2008 it was horrible as well), but no specific examples are given of an act by Obama to suppress votes, or to explain why republican states would fail to send absentee ballots to their soldiers overseas.
They have a story from an actual poll worker, who claims he WATCHED voting machines change the votes of voters. Two problems -- first, in no state is a poll worker allowed to actually watch anybody voting; voting is private. So there is no way he "observed" the actual voting machines changing actual votes. Second problem -- he actually admits this in the story, when it says "Ashcroft explained he had been assigned to monitor who voted, and as the evening went on and the local election computer system went up and down, he discovered that some people who had marked as having voted already also suddenly were reversed." -- he was watching the computer that tracked who came in to vote, and if he was doing his job, he certainly wasn't over trying to peak at what people were voting for.
BTW, electronic voting machines to get out of alignment and slections are missed. There is a video showing that, although there are also videos showing people selecting Obama and getting Romney. When this happens, people see the wrong selection, and they can do the selection again, but usually they will report the problem, and the machine is taken out of service.
The report also mixes in likely true stories about democrats getting mentally handicapped people to vote for Obama, which is a problem only because we have no rules requiring a basic intelligence level to vote, and no rules saying you can't convince people to vote for your candidate -- it's sleazy, it's crass, but it's not voter fraud.