There is no question that there was MASSIVE voter fraud in the election.
The only questions remaining for me:
1) Was it enough to change the outcome of the election? One expert I trust, Michael Barone, while acknowledging fraud occurred, does not think it was enough to change the result.
2) In states where we KNOW voter fraud occurred on a large scale-—OH, PA, VA, FL, CO-—will state officials launch an official investigation? All those states except CO have GOP governors.
3) Another renowned expert on voter fraud-—John Fund-—I have yet to hear anything from him. Has he weighed in on this yet? Would be interesting to see what he has to say about this.
I live in Virginia. Point me to one documented case of large scale voter fraud in Virginia, and I'll be happy to investigate and report on it.
Every specific claim I've seen for Virginia has failed the test. I've researched the complaints about Richmond voting patterns, and found that they matched historic norms.
There was a claim of fraud in Loudoun county, but reports by both the local GOP, and an attorney assigned to that precinct to watch for fraud, indicate that nothing untoward happened.
We know that one candidate's son explained how to commit voter fraud. We don't have evidence that anybody carried out that fraud, especially not on a "large scale".
In a state where Obama won by around 100,000 votes, you'd need a pretty massive fraud to change the outcome. Being a state is pretty republican in statewide and local offices, it's not like the democrats hold the reigns of power and can cover up things like you might speculate in a democratic state.