Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It’s Official: Obama Voter Fraud Reason for “Reelection”
CANADA FREE PRESS ^ | 11/26/2012 | Sher Zieve

Posted on 11/27/2012 9:05:27 AM PST by patriot08

.

The truth about the Obama syndicate’s “victory” in November due to the most massive voter fraud in American history has become increasingly dire and overwhelming. It is also merely the latest treasonous act perpetrated upon We-the-People by our slave masters.

And—with the exception of the still-sycophantic Obama-media who enthusiastically embrace totalitarianism—said “win” by Obama shows how quickly he and the Marxist Democrat Party (with the help of willing RINO Senators and incorrectly named “representatives” of the people) affected the complete overthrow of the United States government…and We-the-People. If you are uncomfortable with these truths and believe that the telling of them constitutes defeatism, I suggest you stop reading now. My message will not get any rosier.

(excerpt)

Before the last stage of our options is forced into implementation, there may be a couple of things we can do to stop the complete destruction and chaotic onslaught by our once-fellow citizen leaders. The first is to file a treason complaint against Obama and see if you can find a grand jury in your state that will agree to pursue it. We only need one, at this juncture. Multiple treason complaints have already been filed by LCDR Walter Fitzpatrick III and have been accepted by the courts as “meritorious.” The second is to get to the electors in each of your/our home states and beg them, in light of the unprecedented November voter fraud, not to cast their vote for Obama until a recount is affected. This must be accomplished before 17 December 2012. Information on both of these items may be accessed at the Jag Hunter and The Electoral College—both links below.

(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: electionfraud; obama; paranoia; paranoidfantasy; tinfoilhats; votefraud; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: sickoflibs; Revelation 911

What’s your take on this?

To me it seems like...

1. You send a message to the Republican Party (drastically reducing R registered voters)
2. You get a chance to eliminate the most evil Leftists during the nomination process
3. You take a pass on the Republican nominees, since they’re worthless anyway
4. If you get a decent sort to register as a Democrat and run, you could actually move things to the Right.


21 posted on 11/27/2012 10:22:05 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Hurricane Sandy..., a week later and 48 million Americans still didn't have power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: patriot08; kingattax

Ping Per your Request


22 posted on 11/27/2012 10:22:51 AM PST by left that other site (Worry is the Darkroom that Develops Negatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriot08

It recently occurred to me how far down the road we are to totalitarianism. This article reminds me that we take rigged elections and voter fraud for granted. Socialist Amerika assumes our rulers should be forced upon us rather than elected. Notice the deafening silence from the GOP, that great bastion of freedom. We are becoming no different from any other third world corrupt country.


23 posted on 11/27/2012 10:26:47 AM PST by strongbow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriot08

From the article: “The first is to file a treason complaint against Obama and see if you can find a grand jury in your state that will agree to pursue it.”

Why stop there? Every member of Congress - Democans and Republicrats alike - are participating in this fraud. By remaining silent, they are complicit.

Every Supervisor of Elections, every member of the political parties, every member of the media - file charges of treason against them and get the little fish to rat out the bigger ones.

And while we’re at it, any action taken in Washington is to be considered the action of an illegitimate government.


24 posted on 11/27/2012 10:28:54 AM PST by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne; Revelation 911
RE :”fwiw - i just changed my registration to dem - two can play this game
.....
What’s your take on this?”

I know a couple of people here who told me they registered as Dems because since Republicans never win the general elections in this state it will allow them to have a say in the primary leading to the general election state winner, and if possible screw Dems nominee up..

Sounds OK to me.

25 posted on 11/27/2012 10:30:20 AM PST by sickoflibs (Has Bohner caved to Obama again yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: patriot08
So did Romney lose because he was the flip-flopping moderate father of Obamacare who failed to inspire the GOP's conservative base or...

...was Mitt Romney actually America's choice, only to be denied victory due to a massive, powerful Democrat vote fraud machine --a machine that somehow neglected to retake the House or capture a 60 seat Senate majority?

If the latter is true, then shouldn't we keep nominating more guys like Romney? After all, why mess with success?

26 posted on 11/27/2012 10:32:57 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gdani
The author should know this.

If you read the article, I have to ask, why do you think the author should know anything?

These posts are more entertaining than the satire pieces, so long as you don't dwell on the fact that people actually believe this stuff.

27 posted on 11/27/2012 10:41:20 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
If you read the article, I have to ask, why do you think the author should know anything?

These posts are more entertaining than the satire pieces, so long as you don't dwell on the fact that people actually believe this stuff.

Ehhh....I was being more diplomatic than you.

28 posted on 11/27/2012 10:48:04 AM PST by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: patriot08

There is no question that there was MASSIVE voter fraud in the election.

The only questions remaining for me:

1) Was it enough to change the outcome of the election? One expert I trust, Michael Barone, while acknowledging fraud occurred, does not think it was enough to change the result.

2) In states where we KNOW voter fraud occurred on a large scale-—OH, PA, VA, FL, CO-—will state officials launch an official investigation? All those states except CO have GOP governors.

3) Another renowned expert on voter fraud-—John Fund-—I have yet to hear anything from him. Has he weighed in on this yet? Would be interesting to see what he has to say about this.


29 posted on 11/27/2012 10:50:21 AM PST by Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriot08
The article gives a long list of a combination of unremarkable facts (ghetto precincts vote for black democrats), unproven assertions (massive fraud happened in swing states), and false claims ("Obama lost in states where voter id laws were in place").

I'll have to admit they are getting better. For example, the first claim used to be "Obama lost every state with real voter photo ID laws". Problem was that 16 states have such laws, and Obama won many of them. Now the claim simply asserts that only 4 states have "voter ID Laws", and picks for very republican states that Obama couldn't steal if he had an army of vote-stealers. The definition of "voter id law" apparently is "law in a state Obama Lost".

It even has a few cases of actual voter fraud, noting that they had a case of a non-citizen being registered as a republican. I'm guessing that was part of the black-ops operation.....

It has these proven false accusations:

  1. "In Ohio, Obama “won” a county by 108% of registered voters—another impossibility, of course, except with well-planned and implemented election fraud" -- In fact, total turnout for that county was 57% of registered voters, and Obama won 51% of those votes, which was actually below his 2008 numbers. The 108%? That's how many more people are on the registration roles than currently live in the county. But only 80% of those are active; and that is reflected in the below-normal 57% turnout).
  2. "In Florida, St. Lucie County and other counties experienced unprecedented voter fraud, with St. Lucie reporting in at a141% turnout—which is impossible" -- Except it isn't, because 141% wasn't the VOTE turnout, it was the BALLOT count. There were two ballots per voters, so the actual turnout was 70%. And the election reports CLEARLY STATE THAT, showing both the number of voters, AND the number of ballots, so it was simple laziness or stupidity of those looking for fraud to get this wrong.
In fact, every specific claim made contains verifiably wrong or easily explained "facts". Most of course are simple declarations.

One of their actual citations for military vote suppression contained this comment:
:UPDATE: Duffel Blog link removed - satire. But read the rest.

And it contained this actual example of "supression":

CBS News: “Tampa-area resident and Navy captain Peter Kehring has spent more than 30 years in the U.S. military. But due to Florida GOP Gov. Rick Scott’s recent purge of voter rolls, Kehring will not be able to cast a vote on Election Day
Yep, that evil Obama enlisted the help of conservative Governor Rick Scott to help supress the military vote.

BTW -- it is clear the overseas military vote is abysmal, and the government is at least partly to blame (in 2008 it was horrible as well), but no specific examples are given of an act by Obama to suppress votes, or to explain why republican states would fail to send absentee ballots to their soldiers overseas.

They have a story from an actual poll worker, who claims he WATCHED voting machines change the votes of voters. Two problems -- first, in no state is a poll worker allowed to actually watch anybody voting; voting is private. So there is no way he "observed" the actual voting machines changing actual votes. Second problem -- he actually admits this in the story, when it says "Ashcroft explained he had been assigned to monitor who voted, and as the evening went on and the local election computer system went up and down, he discovered that some people who had marked as having voted already also suddenly were reversed." -- he was watching the computer that tracked who came in to vote, and if he was doing his job, he certainly wasn't over trying to peak at what people were voting for.

BTW, electronic voting machines to get out of alignment and slections are missed. There is a video showing that, although there are also videos showing people selecting Obama and getting Romney. When this happens, people see the wrong selection, and they can do the selection again, but usually they will report the problem, and the machine is taken out of service.

The report also mixes in likely true stories about democrats getting mentally handicapped people to vote for Obama, which is a problem only because we have no rules requiring a basic intelligence level to vote, and no rules saying you can't convince people to vote for your candidate -- it's sleazy, it's crass, but it's not voter fraud.

30 posted on 11/27/2012 11:06:33 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriot08
Good afternoon.

If you can't trust the soap box. And, if you can't trust the ballot box. There is only one box to trust that remains.

5.56mm

31 posted on 11/27/2012 11:07:48 AM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriot08

We all know that Dims steal elections - the question is what are we willing to do about it? Until that question is answered, we might as well go back to our grazing...


32 posted on 11/27/2012 11:08:33 AM PST by trebb (Allies no longer trust us. Enemies no longer fear us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife
I get to mess with their primaries, send a message to R's in my departure

Subversive is the new hope n change.

and why not - in some states they get to vote in our primaries.....thats how we got mittens

33 posted on 11/27/2012 11:08:55 AM PST by Revelation 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

exactly - I go off reservation and get to muck things up in the process


34 posted on 11/27/2012 11:10:03 AM PST by Revelation 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: patriot08

sour grapes


35 posted on 11/27/2012 11:12:31 AM PST by ksen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriot08

This is an unacceptable explanation because the UN observers would have noticed if there had been any irregularities. :)


36 posted on 11/27/2012 11:13:37 AM PST by 353FMG (The US Constitution is only as effective as those who enforce it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriot08

But isn’t this what the left said when Kerry lost to Bush?


37 posted on 11/27/2012 11:17:29 AM PST by CityCenter (Compromise is the welcome mat to deception.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Spoken llike a true Lib.
Are you one of those paid ones like in that thread that was posted the other day?


38 posted on 11/27/2012 11:18:51 AM PST by patriot08 (NATIVE TEXAN (girl type))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Revelation 911

;^)


39 posted on 11/27/2012 11:27:27 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Hurricane Sandy..., a week later and 48 million Americans still didn't have power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: All

Decisive action against Obama’s left-wing ‘trolls’
WND ^ | November 25, 2012 |

Trolls appear to perform a “disinformation” function typical of counter-intelligence efforts by intelligence agencies to confuse political enemies and refute or deflect opposing political views that are less susceptible to refutation by more traditional methods of debate and argumentation.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2963060/posts


40 posted on 11/27/2012 11:30:02 AM PST by patriot08 (NATIVE TEXAN (girl type))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson