Posted on 11/15/2012 6:30:48 AM PST by Evil Slayer
I received this message yesterday. IF this proves to be true, it is impeachable grounds. It also may help explain why Petreaus was forced out a few days before the Benghazi hearings coming up. It explains a lot of behavior by Obama and his administration - the pulled security, the "stand down" orders, and blaming that stupid video. The fireworks are coming. It will be the first of many disasters ahead.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to sources in the State Department and the CIA, and intercepted communications from the Muslim Brotherhood, Obama "staged" the attack in Benghazi in order to create a monumental "October Surprise" that would guarantee him re-election.
Yes, you read that right, and no, I'm not making this up. Obama, we now know, is and has been working with the Muslim Brotherhood secretly to engineer the release of the "Blind Sheik," Omar Abdel Rahman, the mastermind behind the 1993 World Trade Center attack.
In Obama's October Surprise, he intentionally set up the consulate to have no security so that Chris Stevens could be kidnapped, and held for ransom by Al-Qaeda (and the Muslim Brotherhood). Then, several days before the election, the plan was to trade Chris Stevens for the Blind Sheik, making himself look like a hero, and all but guaranteeing re-election.
This was one of the top reasons why Obama was so insistent on the Muslim Brotherhood getting $1.2 Billion in U.S. Aid. They were to have a primary role in getting Obama re-elected. That is why, even though they knew days before the attack that it was going to occur, no effort was made to bolster security. It was intended to be non-existent. The Libyan security forces were intended to quietly slip into the night when the attack began. And they did, just as planned. That is why, even though 2 C-130U gunships, which were built SPECIFICALLY for this kind of attack, and which could have saved the lives of our people there and were a mere 45 minutes away, were never scrambled at any time during the attack.
There was to be no resistance whatsoever. That is why there were not one, but TWO armed drones flying over the consulate during the conflagration... our CIA operatives on the ground were painting targets because they knew air cover was available. That is why, even though requesting support and backup three times, their requests were NOT ignored, but were intentionally, specifically DENIED three times, and they were told to "stand down," which basically means to "surrender." That was part of Obama's plan.
They were not to fight back. That would potentially undermine the kidnapping effort and cause unnecessary "complications." That is why, even though the CIA operatives and ex-Navy Seals were on the ground, providing real-time reports, and even though they were "lighting up" the source of the mortars attacking the compound with lasers, no gunships or support ever came. They weren't supposed to resist.
That wasn't "part of the plan." It also wasn't part of the plan for one of the CIA operatives to intentionally defy Obama's orders, and who rescued the body of Sean Smith and then stood up again, and engaged the enemy who was attacking American soil. It was supposed to be "clean." Quick. Efficient.
Kidnap the Ambassador and get out. Then Save The Day in the "nick of time." They didn't factor in a tiny group of highly trained ex-Navy Seals/CIA operatives... American Patriots and heroes. Even though they eventually lost their lives in the firefight, they managed to employ the full measure of their skills, and took out over 80 attackers in the process... which enraged the attackers, who were led to believe that they would encounter no resistance.
THAT is why Ambassador Stevens was raped (sodomized), murdered, and dragged through the streets. In their warped minds, they believed that they had been betrayed by the U.S. yet again. They believed that Obama was their friend. They believed that they were going to get their beloved Blind Sheik back. And yet, here were 80 of their own... dead by American hands.
Obama was asked directly in an interview if he denied their request for assistance, he refused to answer, and instead droned on with a canned response promising to "bring those responsible to justice.
"Former CIA and State Dept. personnel are coming out now with damning evidence that indicts President Obama, and reveals the truth about what is going on. Hillary Clinton, who is now openly laying the blame at the feet of the President, after falling on her sword in a premature show of loyalty for the Administration.
The "Video" defense was carefully crafted WEEKS in advance, to explain the attack. If this doesn't outrage you, If you are not moved enough to contact your congressman about this, you are not worthy of your citizenship.
You do have a point there. The weakness that existed in the Senate republicans in the 1990s has expanded to the congressmen.
Why would CNN [or CNNi] refuse to air the Nick Robertson report with Muhammed Al Zawahiri (brother of Ayman Al Zawahiri) that clearly shows the Egyptian uprising was 100% in response to his call for protests for release of the Blind sheik on 9-11.? Why would the most trusted name in news, hide the report showing the truth, and instead allow the false narrative to be sold, by them, to the American electorate?
Here's a link to an article which has the video of the interview that CNN refused to run in the US. Egyptian riots were not about the video, either
The House impeaches, the Senate convicts.
Clinton was impeached but never convicted by the Senate.
Good place to talk things over and plan legal defenses without a lot of Americans watching.
yeah weeping creeps me out. I remember seeing the films of Saddam weeping as his best friends were led out to be shot from the Iraqi parliament
I have been saying this as soon as I heard of the attack.
yep, fer sure.
And many years from now, some bearded hollywood actor who thinks he is so very cool and so much smarter than everyone else will make a movie about it and probably end up blaming Bush...and the dumb socialists that America then has as its citizens will shake their heads at how this could have ever happened to their wonderful leader, obummer, who by then will have been named as permanent leader (aka china, north korea, iran, syria...) and all movies will be made thru the government production company...
I doubt anything will happen to jimmah carter the 2nd. Just like billy jeff the media will swarm around and save his butt. When this is all over, repub heads will be rolling and the zero will be standing amongst smouldering ruins.
This is a bridge to far....
Every day that goes by I smell more of a sting operation on Bam Bam and company by the Broadwell broad.Petraeus may be the well of information or may be the patsy for Zero. Her father implied, to me, she would be worthy of HERO status when all said and done. Maybe she had the dirt on everyone. She looked very relaxed, not a care in the world, standing in front of the window, drinking her glass of wine at her brother’s house. Something is UP with that. I refuse to believe at this point that our FINE soliders would stand for BENGHAZI and not try to take down O in a big way. We will see.
Never mind, Reid. We couldn’t even count on the Senate Republicans to do their impeachment duty when they had a majority and they didn’t risk being accused of racism.
In a situation like this, the sources need to be named, or point the would be Woodward to someone who can be named. Otherwise the source could be an acid flashback for all we know.
It’s gaining legs.
A retired admiral on Lou Dobbs last night was saying this is true: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/11/retired-admiral-james-lyons-ambassador-stevens-death-at-the-consulate-was-a-botched-kidnapping-video/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
the premise is flawed - trading the blind sheik for our ambassador would COST obama votes, not gain them. seems like a whole lot of risk, and effort for little, if any gain.
i’d buy the secret prison scenario before this one, sorry.
beat me to it
The thugs in Benghazi conducted a “Raid” and not an “Attack”. Why? We know where the Ambassador was at 8:30pm, but after that, we’re relying on what we’re being told. We have some photos of him being drug around by some young men. We can’t tell whether the Ambassador is alive or dead in those photos. Maybe that is by design. Obama kidnapping the Ambassador to trade for the blind sheikh? Doesn’t pass the common sense test. Thugs kidnapping an Ambassador to trade for the release of some of their thug friends in Benghazi? That does pass the common sense test.
The house would be the governing body to initate impeachment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.