Posted on 11/15/2012 6:30:48 AM PST by Evil Slayer
I received this message yesterday. IF this proves to be true, it is impeachable grounds. It also may help explain why Petreaus was forced out a few days before the Benghazi hearings coming up. It explains a lot of behavior by Obama and his administration - the pulled security, the "stand down" orders, and blaming that stupid video. The fireworks are coming. It will be the first of many disasters ahead.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to sources in the State Department and the CIA, and intercepted communications from the Muslim Brotherhood, Obama "staged" the attack in Benghazi in order to create a monumental "October Surprise" that would guarantee him re-election.
Yes, you read that right, and no, I'm not making this up. Obama, we now know, is and has been working with the Muslim Brotherhood secretly to engineer the release of the "Blind Sheik," Omar Abdel Rahman, the mastermind behind the 1993 World Trade Center attack.
In Obama's October Surprise, he intentionally set up the consulate to have no security so that Chris Stevens could be kidnapped, and held for ransom by Al-Qaeda (and the Muslim Brotherhood). Then, several days before the election, the plan was to trade Chris Stevens for the Blind Sheik, making himself look like a hero, and all but guaranteeing re-election.
This was one of the top reasons why Obama was so insistent on the Muslim Brotherhood getting $1.2 Billion in U.S. Aid. They were to have a primary role in getting Obama re-elected. That is why, even though they knew days before the attack that it was going to occur, no effort was made to bolster security. It was intended to be non-existent. The Libyan security forces were intended to quietly slip into the night when the attack began. And they did, just as planned. That is why, even though 2 C-130U gunships, which were built SPECIFICALLY for this kind of attack, and which could have saved the lives of our people there and were a mere 45 minutes away, were never scrambled at any time during the attack.
There was to be no resistance whatsoever. That is why there were not one, but TWO armed drones flying over the consulate during the conflagration... our CIA operatives on the ground were painting targets because they knew air cover was available. That is why, even though requesting support and backup three times, their requests were NOT ignored, but were intentionally, specifically DENIED three times, and they were told to "stand down," which basically means to "surrender." That was part of Obama's plan.
They were not to fight back. That would potentially undermine the kidnapping effort and cause unnecessary "complications." That is why, even though the CIA operatives and ex-Navy Seals were on the ground, providing real-time reports, and even though they were "lighting up" the source of the mortars attacking the compound with lasers, no gunships or support ever came. They weren't supposed to resist.
That wasn't "part of the plan." It also wasn't part of the plan for one of the CIA operatives to intentionally defy Obama's orders, and who rescued the body of Sean Smith and then stood up again, and engaged the enemy who was attacking American soil. It was supposed to be "clean." Quick. Efficient.
Kidnap the Ambassador and get out. Then Save The Day in the "nick of time." They didn't factor in a tiny group of highly trained ex-Navy Seals/CIA operatives... American Patriots and heroes. Even though they eventually lost their lives in the firefight, they managed to employ the full measure of their skills, and took out over 80 attackers in the process... which enraged the attackers, who were led to believe that they would encounter no resistance.
THAT is why Ambassador Stevens was raped (sodomized), murdered, and dragged through the streets. In their warped minds, they believed that they had been betrayed by the U.S. yet again. They believed that Obama was their friend. They believed that they were going to get their beloved Blind Sheik back. And yet, here were 80 of their own... dead by American hands.
Obama was asked directly in an interview if he denied their request for assistance, he refused to answer, and instead droned on with a canned response promising to "bring those responsible to justice.
"Former CIA and State Dept. personnel are coming out now with damning evidence that indicts President Obama, and reveals the truth about what is going on. Hillary Clinton, who is now openly laying the blame at the feet of the President, after falling on her sword in a premature show of loyalty for the Administration.
The "Video" defense was carefully crafted WEEKS in advance, to explain the attack. If this doesn't outrage you, If you are not moved enough to contact your congressman about this, you are not worthy of your citizenship.
And you think the Senate would vote to remove him from office after the House impeached him? Remember Clinton?
Sorry, won’t happen. Even if true, even if exposed, even if impeached by House.......
We are deeply into days of lawlessness - by government....
The final report:
The Petraeus CIA provided inaccurate information about events on the ground to the Obama Administration, particularly to President Obama and United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice.
The press suppressed information until after the election.
The Senate WILL NOT move on any issue impeachment.
The media will make this a one day story at best.
It must be true, it’s on the internet.
The story about the request to release the blind sheik was out there before Benghazi. There were several articles by Andrew McCarthy and the guy who led the prosecution team in the case against the blind Sheik, saying that Americans needed to beware because they thought that Obama was maneuvering to release him and that if he didn’t do it before the election that win or lose he would do it after the election.
There is some value in impeachment without conviction. At minimum, we at least go down fighting. Perhaps it wounds and hobbles the regime; perhaps it makes them more defiant; either way, impeachment is either right or wrong on its own merit, regardless of what reed (sick!) does or does not do.
obama says: “Eat your golden goose and stfu!”
(nothing will come of this)
Even if this could be proved beyond any possible shadow of a doubt, the media, the Senate and the 47% wouldn’t care a bit. The only response would be “we won”,
Oh, he can be impeached. Clinton was impeached, but the Senate failed to remove him from office.
Brings to mind former LA Gov. Edwin Edwards' statement, "the only thing that could do me in is if I were caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
Were this to happen to Obama, the "media" would hide the dead girl and blame the boy.
It is my cynical belief that Obama could freely hand over all our military assets to Russia, China and Iran and the voting sheeple
would hardly blink
Santa Claus has been re-elected and we can go back to watching DWTS. Benghazi LIbya.. Is that a new wings place?
Barak Obama can do as he pleases and he knows it. Who is there to stop him?
“Genl Betrayus will take whatever blame should be Obamas”
He certainly will since his wife got paid off.
Might be a plot to a movie...but the motive doesn’t sound plausible. To trade away the blind sheik would smell more like capitulation to terrorists than Obama riding to the rescue. Seems to me *that* would have had a negative impact on his popularity.
Constitution 101.
#
Col. Ken ALLARD: Obama knew about the attack, ignored three requests for help
Sunday, October 28, 2012 7:42:26 AM · 4 of 38
wiggen to Cincinatus’ Wife
The ambassador was not meant to die i bet. Smoke inhalation. I bet all along he was going to be captured without a shot being fired hence the stand down orders. Obama frees him and boom,big positive public relations before the election. If,as is widely assumed we arm arming the rebels in Syria would these people attack us at this time?The whole narrative changed when the 2 CIA men went and engaged the enemy with full expectation of help. This story is likely far dirtier than it;s even being reported.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies
Trading the blind sheik for a kidnapped US ambassador doesn’t seem like it would have been a big political win for Obama. All the same questions concerning lax security that allowed the successful terrorist attack could also have been asked about how a US ambassador could have been kidnapped.
Some of the actions and inactions by the administration that are supposed to have followed the supposed boshed kidnapping plan do make sense, but trading the blind sheik for a kidnapped ambassador sure wouild not have been a foreign policy victory for Obama. The opposite.
Who’s going to impeach him? Boehner’s House? Who’s going to convict him? Reid’s Senate? Who’s going to put pressure on Congress to do something? The MSM or the Obamaphone nation?
Don’t see it happening.
I have been so angry and frustrated over Benghazi since it happened I don't know what to do.
Romney should have been all over this and the O's other impeachable offenses, of which there are plenty.
McStupid is NOW all over this, but where was he when most of us conservatives knew what Obama was going to be? Well, he was listening to Steve Schmidt and his other overpriced know nothings and teling us O would make a good President, basically endorsing the enemy.
The diff between McCain and Romney's vote was Sarah Palin.
vaudine
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.